![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1364865)
I suppose that IF the 747 rumor was true, THEN considering the number of 747's that fly out of the ATL, and the number of guys commuting to DTW... You would then see 777 guys going to ATL for a (hypothetical) new category. Anything new to ATL at the top payscale will be heavily bid by all pilots, not just pilots on the respective side of the shoe line. I think the 330 went that way, didn't it.
Not sure how many 777 guys want to go to school for no extra money. I guess if it would move them up in relative seniority they might. Right now, I think the only trip the 747 flys out of ATL is NRT, is that right? Meanwhile us ATL 777 guys are DH'n to LAX, DTW and MSP for most of our trips, only DXB and JNB are truly ATL trips...for now. |
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1364859)
As far as I know, it means the CN didn't want the NYC FO's to be unrepresented for 4-6 weeks while regular election was held. Lots of things could happen in that time and there would be no voice for those pilots. (the votes are not able to be proxied to another voting rep in the interim).
It is a rock and a hard place for the current rep and the membership, both options were bad. Luckily for all the NY pilots, it is a short time for an interim rep and the next regular election nomination time is this fall, and will take place via ballotpoint. Very good points. They could have appointed/voted in an interim rep at the meeting this month and run ballot point correct? A pain for sure, but isn't it possible to have one resign at a year and a day, appoint an intermediate Rep, and then run the full ballot point election? So who is running Shiz? Guess pilots are going to either need to bid off and show up, or shut up and deal with whomever they get if they cannot make this a priority. |
Originally Posted by The Cavalier
(Post 1364834)
Rather convenient. I understand that it's on the membership to show up to meetings but NYC is a commuter base. Very convenient.
Originally Posted by p3flteng
(Post 1364836)
What does all this mean? Is there something in play?
Who cares and at this point it does not matter. The procedure that will be used has been determined. The date the decision will be made has been set. Now every C66 pilot needs to bid off and be there, or deal with the results if they cannot make it a priority. |
Originally Posted by Rogue24
(Post 1364889)
Who cares and at this point it does not matter. The procedure that will be used has been determined. The date the decision will be made has been set. Now every C66 pilot needs to bid off and be there, or deal with the results if they cannot make it a priority.
|
Originally Posted by FmrFreightDog
(Post 1364914)
Good thinking. Let's see how the company feels about shutting the NYC operation down for a day so everyone can "bid off and make it a priority."
GMAB. In a large council during a good turnout you may see 20-25% turnout for the vote. That is when one can do it in their shorts at their computer. I highly doubt that more than 1/5 of the electorate would vote in a ballot point election if that was the option. With pilots having to show up I am sure that the same percentage bidding off would not cause issue with the operation. |
Category question... I'm looking at the new PWA pay scales and categories, and am not sure I understand the 767 categories now that I see the pay scales. I never paid much attention since the ALPA crystal ball says I'll be a narrowbody FO for life. But I want to be an optimistic guy, so I'm trying to look at the next aircraft I might possibly ever get and finger it out.
Is the 767-400 pay scale what we call the 765 in NYC and ATL? If so, uhm... why? I don't see no 5. But it's payscale is above other 767 so I'm guessing it is? Is the 767-300ER, 767-300/200, and 757 pay scales (all the same) what we call the 7ER? And so, what exactly is the ATL 767 category that is closing? What actual payscale and aircraft is it, and where does it fly vs. the 7ER? Thanks much! |
Originally Posted by Roadkill
(Post 1364918)
Category question... I'm looking at the new PWA pay scales and categories, and am not sure I understand the 767 categories now that I see the pay scales. I never paid much attention since the ALPA crystal ball says I'll be a narrowbody FO for life. But I want to be an optimistic guy, so I'm trying to look at the next aircraft I might possibly ever get and finger it out.
Is the 767-400 pay scale what we call the 765 in NYC and ATL? If so, uhm... why? I don't see no 5. But it's payscale is above other 767 so I'm guessing it is? Is the 767-300ER, 767-300/200, and 757 pay scales (all the same) what we call the 7ER? And so, what exactly is the ATL 767 category that is closing? What actual payscale and aircraft is it, and where does it fly vs. the 7ER? Thanks much! 7ER=757/767 domestic and international 767=757/767 domestic only So by closing the 767 categories, the company gets away with less pilots required. I believe at one point there was a 764 category as well, which was 767-400 flying domestic only. So I believe it used to be: 765=767-400 International only 764=767-400 Domestic only 7ER=757-200/300 & 767-300/300ER Domestic & International 767=757-200/300 & 767-300/300ER Domestic only Clear as mud? :) I could be wrong on the 764 category once existing. PMDL guys please confirm. |
Confirmed.
|
thanks! That's what I suspected, but wasn't sure.
|
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1364929)
Confirmed.
Originally Posted by Roadkill
(Post 1364930)
thanks! That's what I suspected, but wasn't sure.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:22 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands