![]() |
Originally Posted by Tomcat
(Post 662810)
I've heard it's terrible.... I'm just doing it for the greater good of the pilot group..... to save a fellow LAX pilot from being MD out of SoCal. This is part of my agenda and stratagy to begin my run for National ALPA Chairman!:eek: Move over Lee, I'm on my way!!!!!!!!:rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 662894)
What?
If you know someone that will do better than LM on Scope (AND THE OTHER CRUCIAL ISSUES), then tell us 1) who they are, 2) what they want to do, 3) how they will do it. In addition, please disclose any relationship between them and others who are actually even more "retro". IOW, prove to us you actually are supporting "new blood" that isn't in fact "old blood". Old and bitter, and politically motivated that is. Meantime, this personal obsession with LM is getting tiresome.
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 662894)
Bar,
One item on which I agree completely: flow-throughs are UNSAT, and probably counterproductive. They serve little purpose in terms of the "pro-quo", and all the "quids" usually are heinous. Overall I like Moak. You and I disagree with him for the same reasons, scope and flow throughs. There is no reason to single the Chairman out except for the fact that he has been the sole source of leadership and communication on the issue. Moak isn't up for election. The Reps in my council are. All that is desired is a Rep that will vote the way his pilots have asked him to vote. A more participatory MEC could be a good thing. I've asked friends who are running to promise they will hold their ground and vote for with pilots' direction, even if that vote is unpopular at the MEC level. We could use a little more grass roots orientation, & participation, as we prepare for C2012. As far as I know, candidates have not been nominated yet. It is not appropriate to post names here and I'm even careful about posting current Reps names although that is public information. You are correct about change with no real change. It could make things worse. I'll PM you. |
Originally Posted by sinca3
(Post 662947)
Yeah it's been awhile....
Why can't he show up to the lounges like he did for the DCI pilots? I understand that pilots should get involved or be at meetings, but everyone can't attend all the time. Personally I think it would go a LONG way if the MEC chairman were to hangout in the Delta pilot lounges and squash rumor or answer questions! Hanging out in the pilot lounge is generally the purview of the local council representatives. The MEC Administration supplements those visits at the request of the LEC Representatives during significant events to provide technical expertise (Negotiators, R&I, Scheduling). Also, the P2P program when activated will place volunteers in the lounge to provide information and solicit input. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 662469)
The Delta MEC represents Compass pilots as well(no furloughs). Moak goes to their crew room, and a single poster misrepresents what was said, in both tone and context. This forum then piles on. I can see how the Salem witch trials got started...:(
|
Junglebus, most of us have figured out by now that RoughLandings' post was accurate.
Thanks for adding to it. To me the problem here with scope is an absolute communication failure on the part of Mr. Moak and DALPA to tell us where they stand on the issue of scope. Why won't he just say it to all of the Delta pilots and not just the Compass pilots that 76 seat flying is gone for good and so on? |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 663060)
Junglebus, most of us have figured out by now that RoughLandings is probably reporting what was said very much correct. Thanks for the additional information.
Everything that RL said is 100% CORRECT What I want to know is how does slowplay know about the AA MD 80 guy? It was mostly Compass guys with 2 other NWA guys?? Makes me go HMMM. And the AA guy was spot on. I was not impressed at all by LM. |
Dangit, my bad grammar just be quoted. I was hurrying on an iphone. :)
I didn't know there was an AA MD80 guy there? What did he say about the whole argument about AA's problems are that they will not relax their scope? |
Originally Posted by bohicagain
(Post 663065)
What I want to know is how does slowplay know about the AA MD 80 guy?
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 663066)
Dangit, my bad grammar just be quoted. I was hurrying on an iphone. ;)
I didn't know there was an AA MD80 guy there? What did he say about the whole argument about AA's problems are that they will not relax their scope? yeah one of our LCA is a former AA 80 furlough. He stated that APA set the line in the sand with a few 70 seaters and nothing else. LM response was that is the reason he is still on the street. If APA allows 76 seater E jets that he would be recalled in a second. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 663068)
Junglebus drums talk long distance, make lots of noise...:D
Junglebus drum, good drum, beat truth. Fencepost keeps getting moved on to our land. Our buffalo used to run entire plains. We had no fence to keep us from our land. Medicine Man Bucking Bar say Fence no good. Treaty with White Man is Buffalo Crap, White Man no keep promises. Only way to be strong is to unite the tribes and take back the planes, I mean, plains. :D |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:29 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands