![]() |
|
Originally Posted by TheManager
(Post 1380316)
Try looking to the avatar to the left. That fine lapel pin/tie tack was sent to me and every other ALPA member post BK.
|
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1380665)
C2K lasted until just 6 months short of its amendable date (5/1/05).
So while your post is interesting reading, the timeline is very different from the facts as I know them. I did not claim C2K, or pilot pensions, were the hinge for bankruptcy, they were not. The fact is the "need to declare bankruptcy" was being somewhat openly discussed by former Delta management in early to mid 2000, well before C2K. Their guess as to when Delta would file was amazingly accurate. Contract 2000 scope did not even last six months before being modified. I believe the ratio components were the first to be re-negotiated. This makes sense since the ratios would have required rapid mainline expansion just to remain in compliance with the RJ orders that were already booked in late 1999. Management knew C2K would be modified very quickly. Anyone who expected Delta to take it's firm deliveries for RJ's knew that the 34%, 36% and 37% ratio limits were likely to be breached. After all, with 500+ aircraft on order or under contract it implies mainline would have needed a fleet three times that size to perform two thirds of the block hours ... did anyone expect a 1,500+ jet mainline fleet? It is likely that Leo Mullin did not negotiate with any intention of honoring the agreement in it's entirety. The job protection provisions alone telegraph that message clearly ... and of course we well know the effect, with more than a thousand Delta pilots on the street while small jet subsidiaries of Delta Air Lines were junior manning Captains from new hire classes. While contract 2000's failures resulted in my suspicion of ratios as an effective job protection device, those used in C2012 appear to have been much better thought out. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1380621)
Which is my concern. How would we ever justify having a pilot on duty >16 hours?
|
Originally Posted by TheManager
Try looking to the avatar to the left. That fine lapel pin/tie tack was sent to me and every other ALPA member post BK
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1380348)
Uh.... BOOM. I'd say that's a head shot, haha.
Originally Posted by slowplay
I'm pretty sure that pin was sent to you in November 2000, quite a long time pre-bankruptcy
|
Originally Posted by TheManager
(Post 1380316)
Try looking to the avatar to the left. That fine lapel pin/tie tack was sent to me and every other ALPA member post BK.
|
DAL Manning numbers
Current DAL manning for summer of 2013 at an ALV of 84 would have us "overmanned" by 400 Pilots. ALV will not be that high.
Summer 2014 would have us undermanned by 300. Hiring is around the corner felllas, the only question is how long until we turn the corner? Scoop :) |
Originally Posted by georgetg
(Post 1380622)
sad, but that was my first reaction also :D
There are a lot of moving pieces to the operation and it's really amazing how well it actually works. Well over 90% of the time everything goes as planned. Generally it's the unexpected things that throw a monkey-wrench into the operation. It's been my experience that when that happens most Delta people pick up the slack and "mask" the problem by making everything work out anyways...
Operational Excellence memo wants us to stop "masking" the problems and let the data speak. The problem is a lot of what we do at work is "masking" the operation's inefficiencies... Where is the cutoff for when to "mask" and when to just go at "normal speed?" When some of the AA pilots stopped "masking" issues caused by other departments what were the results? Again, I want Delta to run as well as the "European Train system" (maybe minus the Italian ;) ) but I don't think Flight Ops is the department in need of significant improvement... Cheers George An excellent post! You're a pretty well-informed guy and I'm guessing you saw the email that circulated last fall from an AA First Officer... (For those who didn't read it: This First Officer, and the Captain he was flying with, did everything required by their job, but not one iota more. This email detailed how rapidly dysfunctional the operation became when pilots didn't step up and do what's necessary to keep things flowing. It was hugely ugly.) When I read that email I thought of Delta's own operation and of all the things we do, on a daily basis, to keep the operation flowing relatively smoothly and mostly on time. I firmly believe Delta management is blissfully unaware of all that we do. We sure as h*ll don't get thanked for it (much less compensated). As far as this: "Operational Excellence memo wants us to stop "masking" the problems and let the data speak." My response would be: "Really?" In theory maintenance write-ups should occur with equal frequency on flights from a hub to an out-station as on the return flights. Yet I'd bet a bunch of money (and I'm not a betting man) that the difference is staggering. Do they really want us to write up discrepancies where they happen and highlight the gaping holes in maintenance coverage? |
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1380747)
Current DAL manning for summer of 2013 at an ALV of 84 would have us "overmanned" by 400 Pilots. ALV will not be that high.
Summer 2014 would have us undermanned by 300. Hiring is around the corner felllas, the only question is how long until we turn the corner? Scoop :) |
Originally Posted by Delta1067
(Post 1380610)
So in a nutshell the same "Whitlow" rule will apply to international with the new rules. I realize it wont be called Whitlow but you will duty out for SC for international in the same amount of time as you would for domestic. Thanks all I was looking for. :D
|
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1380747)
Current DAL manning for summer of 2013 at an ALV of 84 would have us "overmanned" by 400 Pilots. ALV will not be that high.
Summer 2014 would have us undermanned by 300. Hiring is around the corner felllas, the only question is how long until we turn the corner? Scoop :) http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...uNkvFqEC8u-te_ |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:24 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands