Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2013 | 05:19 PM
  #132311  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Actually, you did. The contract is being followed.
i.e. a waiver was granted...
Old 06-09-2013 | 05:27 PM
  #132312  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by Falcon7
I mean is this really your beef?
No. My big beef is that ALPA has changed policy to redefine Delta flying as only the flying contained within Delta's scope agreement. Further, our former Chairman took the position that everything in our scope section should not really be considered "scope." (so who knows what is protected under this new definition? How about the AF JV flying we aren't actually able to fix until March 2015?) Thus other airlines are authorized by ALPA to make Deals with Delta management without the knowledge or consent of the Delta pilots for anything THEY deem is not "Delta Flying."
Originally Posted by Falcon7
Bucking Bar, just outline the order in our contract that you say was re ordered.
The Pinnacle Bridge agreement is ill considered for a number of other reasons. First, it creates a marketplace where airlines can come in and bid for Delta's permitted flying. Pinnacle bought itself a slice with concessions. Secondly, the Bridge Agreement provisions are ill considered and strategically not aligned with the expressed goals of our union as outlined in the Administrative Manual as adopted by our Board of Directors.

Lets start with instructions, as outlined in our Administrative Manual which reflects the democratic guidance of our union.
Originally Posted by admin manual
ALPA, Admin Manual, Section 40, Part 5 – Contents of Agreements
PREFERENTIAL HIRING OF ALPA PILOTS
It shall be ALPA's goal to secure contract language in every ALPA agreement which provides for the preferential hiring of ALPA-represented pilots displaced by furlough, bankruptcy, shutdown or strike. In furtherance of this goal, each MEC shall use its best efforts to secure first right of interview for displaced ALPA pilots. Every MEC should act in the manner it deems most effective in achieving this goal.

Additionally, each MEC shall then use its best efforts to secure interview priority for other ALPA pilots.
Notice that we Delta pilots did just that in our contract
Originally Posted by Delta PWA
The Company will offer preferential interviews for employment to airmen employed by carriers (whose airmen were represented by the Association) at the time those carriers ceased operations, subject to the Company’s objectives for diversity and experience among newly hired pilots and subject to (the following)

The Company will fill a minimum of 35% of the aggregate of all positions in Delta pilot new-hire classes in each trailing twelve-month period (to the extent airmen are available) with ALPA-represented airmen at Delta Connection Carriers, subject to such airmen meeting the Company’s competitive hiring standards, and subject to the Company’s objectives for diversity and experience among newly hired pilots. Airmen who flow up pursuant to LOA #9 and LOA #10 count toward satisfaction of such minimum percentage.
Then the Pinnacle pilots came along and put themselves at the front of the line. It is not what the Delta pilots wanted or else we would have worded our contract like this ... Pinnacle changed our contract by adding to it.
Originally Posted by Pinnacle Bridge Agreement
: the minimum number of available positions filled in Section 2.e.i. may be satisfied by offering positions to at least two-thirds (2/3) of such positions to Pinnacle
pilots in seniority order under the SSP and one-third (1/3) to any eligible Pinnacle pilot. For example, if there are 30 available positions in a Delta new hire class apart from those filled by LOA #9 and LOA #10, seven (7) positions at a minimum would be filled by pilots under the SSP and three (3) may be filled by Pinnacle pilots selected outside the SSP.
So Pinnacle took our offer of help to ALPA members who have lost their jobs and put their senior Captains first. That's just bad policy.

But more importantly, all this was done so our flying could be sold. Just as it was necessary to get Compass out of our MEC before they could be sold, ALPA wants to divide Delta flying and deal in the part we are not actively flying.

Given that those contracts extend past our amendable date, it acts as a check valve. We now have lost jobs we will probably not get back.

Further, some Pinnacle insiders are already pretty excited about Delta's contract 2015. We are not yet studying our opener, but now that the market is open others are sure talking about theirs.
Old 06-09-2013 | 05:28 PM
  #132313  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Default

Bar,

Great post...as per usual.

Leine,

I understand your point. But here's my problem. I think (key word: "think") DALPA's scope giveaway is designed to meet the "spirit" (but not the "word") of the contractual scope terms. So DALPA took the magnanimous position of saying okay...

Where has the reverse happened? When has Delta honored the "spirit" of the contract as opposed to the written word? Did they do that with the Frontier/Republic scope issue? How about with the interpretation of the number of permitted 70+ seat RJ's?

Seriously.

My impression, based on many years at Delta, is management will hide behind contractual language when it's in their interest, and say "Gee fellas...this is what the contract means to us..." when it's convenient.

This was a (wasted) opportunity to hold managements feet to the fire and, from my perspective, it was squandered (again).

What's the point of having a contract if it's not going to be followed, and what's the point of paying dues to an organization to negotiate and uphold a contract if they are going to (continually) turn the other cheek?
Old 06-09-2013 | 05:28 PM
  #132314  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
I'm sorry 80, I'm not quite sure what you are asking here. The basic questions I see are: Did the agreement between Delta Management and the Pinnacle pilots violate the Delta Pilot Working Agreement? If so, what section specifically does it violate? Does it violate the RLA? I don't see how it violates either one. If some is going to explain it to me please remember simple words, I was a history major.......and that was quite awhile ago!

I am by no means endorsing what happened nor am I happy about it. I just don't see what recourse we have...

Denny
I don't speak legalese that well, nor do I know our contract inside and out. Bar has a much better grasp and knowledge of these things.

What I do know is that it sets a very dangerous precedent and Moak and Wychor should have been shut down and at the very least slapped on the wrist.
Old 06-09-2013 | 05:30 PM
  #132315  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Actually.....I wouldn't. I'd get my car fixed and move on with my life. I've better things to do then fester and harp over what could've been. The problem with your analogy is that the system isn't broken. Everything we have is ours because as a group we approved it. Over 60% of our pilot group voted YES for this latest TA. And now it's our contract. Done. Over. We can't change it.

So while I enjoy and encourage sharing thoughts, I don't enjoy reading the same gripes, moans, and complaints about what is done. Choosing to not fly ALV+15 is now gone. The RJ scope has been changed. Over. We can either unite and decide how we want to fix it, or continue to mindlessly whine over something that 62% of our pilot group thought wasn't a bad deal.
You can't move on until you agree there's a problem. Another analogy, "hey babe, yeah, I was sleeping around, but I've moved on..." Ain't going to cut it. Some don't see a problem with more large RJs or ALV+15. So next contract what's to stop more large RJs and elimination of ALV+15 for all because in international categories blah blah blah?

Something else sometimes happens in an argument. You learn youre wrong. It's not a bad thing. I'd love to be like "HEY DALPA IS SCREWING US ON [name it]!" And ACL says "Actually, this is why, this is why it's good for you, its a good thing." To which the response should be "oh, I stand corrected." I see 80 admit more than anyone when he's wrong. And trust me, I'd rather be wrong about ALPA then right. I just worry I'm not.

Also, here's the thing about a healthy discourse. I personally don't care if a pilot is DAL M88, 737, 767, senior, junior, ALPA lover, ALPA hater, hater in general, etc. I enjoy talking to anyone in person. I'd enjoy talking to Slow and Alfa although I may ask more questions than bow up and argue. I'm not that way, I like to get people to talk, I learn. But here on this forum is where we debate ideas and hope gunship sneaks a good pic of kate upton. It's almost a good thing names and rank and stuff is hidden. I think it's unique and good vs the dalpa forums if done correctly.

I'm a good FO. I can get along with anyone but I'm not sure everyone would get a long with me. Take Ferd for instance, look at some of the posts he's directed my way:

Originally Posted by Ferd149
You're a sissy cat FTB
Originally Posted by Ferd149
I hate guys like FTB who post oversized pictures
Originally Posted by Ferd149
FTB, I'd like to slap you up the side of your head.
Originally Posted by Ferd149
FTB you're like a bird on my patio, prancing around trying to look pretty. Why are you? A cockatoo?
Originally Posted by Ferd149
Shock me FTB, say something intelligent.
Originally Posted by Ferd149
Dimes are silver, pennies are brass, why does your face, look like your ass FTB?
Originally Posted by Ferd149
FTB, I see you were so impressed with your first chin that you added two more?


It hurts on the inside because some of its true. And to come from an F-15 Tomcat pilot that flew at Ft Monroe, that hurts even more.

Originally Posted by johnso29
If people on this board want to chew someone's ear off about scope, head over to the Alaska TA thread. Their NC decided to protect $$$ & their pilots in a merger scenario instead of establishing scope protection. Nothing stops Skypest, RAH, etc from flying 100 seat RJs as Alaska. NOTHING. And that's what THEIR NC chose.
I don't know, but what is LM doing over at national?

Last edited by forgot to bid; 06-09-2013 at 05:41 PM.
Old 06-09-2013 | 05:36 PM
  #132316  
capncrunch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,355
Likes: 34
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
i.e. a waiver was granted...
Watching his transformation has been painfull. Now he is progressed to half truths....transformation complete.
Old 06-09-2013 | 05:45 PM
  #132317  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
I do think it is a big deal. I don't see it as violating our contract unless someone can show me where. There is a difference.

Denny
Denny,

Here is ALPA's Counsel, Mr. Bill Roberts describing "Delta Flying" in his deposition:
Originally Posted by A is Bill Roberts's response to questions
Q So when you use the term Delta flying, you're referring to flying by Delta Airlines and by wholly owned carriers of Delta?

A Well, I think I'm referring to the flying that's done by or for Delta.

Q By or for Delta Airlines only?

A When you talked about Delta flying, it's flying that's done by or for Delta.

Q So is say Comair flying, flying that you would characterize as Delta flying?

A If it's flying, you know, under the Delta code then it's flying certainly for Delta.

Q Is flying for Delta what you consider Delta flying?

A I think in terms of the comfort it is. In terms of the scope clause, I think that is -- I believe that's how it's defined in the scope clause.

Q So is it your testimony, that the permission to affiliated or wholly owned carriers that appears in the Delta scope clause, is the method by which Comair for example is allowed to fly at all?

A Well, I think -- I think it's the method by which they can fly for Delta.
Mr. Robert's is pretty clear then that he believes flying for Delta is Delta flying and is only permitted under the Delta pilot working agreement. There is no discussion of Comair (in this case) being able to subcontract within Delta's contract, as ALPA would not authorize ASA or Comair to do so back then.

Now, despite claims to the contrary, Pinnacle has an agreement which restricts Delta flying. Pinnacle's agreement literally supercedes ours by duration.

Ironically, my guess is Wychor studied and learned from JC Lawson, Bob Arnold and the early (pre litigation) RJDC playbook and used his position to actually pull off what JC Lawson and Bob Arnold were trying to accomplish; scope which bound Delta Air Lines. Be interesting to hear Duane Woerth's opinion on the change.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 06-09-2013 at 06:04 PM.
Old 06-09-2013 | 05:47 PM
  #132318  
capncrunch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,355
Likes: 34
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Actually.....I wouldn't. I'd get my car fixed and move on with my life. I've better things to do then fester and harp over what could've been. The problem with your analogy is that the system isn't broken. Everything we have is ours because as a group we approved it. Over 60% of our pilot group voted YES for this latest TA. And now it's our contract. Done. Over. We can't change it.

So while I enjoy and encourage sharing thoughts, I don't enjoy reading the same gripes, moans, and complaints about what is done. Choosing to not fly ALV+15 is now gone. The RJ scope has been changed. Over. We can either unite and decide how we want to fix it, or continue to mindlessly whine over something that 62% of our pilot group thought wasn't a bad deal.
Your contempt is shameful.
Old 06-09-2013 | 05:58 PM
  #132319  
Ferd149's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: LAX ERA
Default

FTB.......you mentalist you, did my wife teach you how to read my mind. I love it

Your Uncle Ferd
Old 06-09-2013 | 05:59 PM
  #132320  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

When did this place become a pet store?

What gives? It's like thumbing through:



I mean, I love FTB like a brother from another mother, but my ankles itch when I visit this web site now.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices