Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

boog123 07-06-2013 01:37 PM


Originally Posted by qball (Post 1440358)
Let's see. 747/4, A330, A320, DTW, MSP, SEA. And oh...those damn pilots like you mentioned. You must be a real treat to fly with.

CEO, IT, VPs, foqa, NRT, ALK, experience in Asia, experience with buyer used aircraft, code shares, jvs, things that help make tons on money and the current airline profitable.

He probably thinks they should have gone at it alone and merged with whoever was left like American had to do.

Timbo 07-06-2013 02:08 PM


Originally Posted by buzzpat (Post 1440364)
Let it go!! Seriously guys! You're boring the sh!t out of me. Underboob, please?!!!


This!

Now, can we talk about something important, like, how do you crash land a 777????

An MD11, sure, easy to do, but a 777? Easiest landing airplane I've ever landed.

boog123 07-06-2013 02:39 PM


Originally Posted by N9373M (Post 1440379)
Tan is my favorite flavor.

Yeah, you all are right, shouldnt get drawn in debates with people like ole dalad there, kinda miss him and mr pushy push, where did he go anyway?

This girls daddy must be so proud!

Timbo 07-06-2013 02:52 PM

RE. the crashed 777 in SFO, sounds like they were trasitioned to the inbord (28R) on final. WX looked good, but eye witness said they were low and slow (obviously) and was the GS up for the inboard?

I don't know if that one had the Rolls Royce engines, but several years ago there were issues with the fuel/oil heat exchanger, forming ice balls, which resulted in the BA 777 landing short. They pushed the power up and nothing happened, due to the ice in the fuel line. They were all supposed to be fixed several years ago.

finis72 07-06-2013 03:16 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1440214)
Then you've never read anything on the website. They attack ALPA for sure...and for very accurate reasons. But there are many new ways of doing business listed. What you've said is just not true.



This is the kind of stuff that makes me believe you never signed a card or ever went to the website. I don't recall anything from you other than 100% full throated ALPA support. That is of course your right, I just don't remember even the smallest thought of an independent union from you.



This is where you are so wrong finis and your position at the top of the heap is skewing your thinking. First, it's wrong to exclude UPS and FDX. Second, the fact that our pay for the 747 and 777 is approaching that of SWA crews is nothing to crow about. Every pilot makes that at SWA. Only a small percentage of Delta pilots make what you and I make. Further, a significant portion of our seniority list will NEVER make what we make because they'll never get there. You really need to rethink your statement above.



We know with 100% certainty finis. There wasn't even a hint of buying the Virgin stake or the remnants of Pinnacle. Only the corporate goal of debt reduction. The only reason they were able to make these purchases was because of the money we left on the table. If we had taken that money, they wouldn't have been able to make these outsource facilitating purchases and still meet the debt reduction milestones they promised Wall Street.



See above. By leaving extra money on the table, we allowed management to keep their debt reduction promises and make these new outsourcing purchases.

Again, we (DALPA) actually aided management in purchasing more opportunities for management to outsource our jobs. Why would we do that? Because ALPA's mandate is to gain members by spreading the wealth from the have's (Delta pilots) to the have not's (DCI & select JV partners). Welcome to ALPA's brave new world.

Carl

Carl, sorry, let me rephrase so you will understand. You nor anybody else not in senior management know if and when the company would have walked away from the table. This TA could or could not have been the best deal we were going to get. Whether this TA passed or not DL was going to make record profits this year and they would have made those investments regardless (educated guess on my part, I'm not in mgmt either but I did look at the financial statements real close).
You are correct about your website, I haven't visited it in quite awhile nor do I intend to.

biigD 07-06-2013 03:32 PM


Originally Posted by crazyjaydawg (Post 1440410)
Maybe the flight attendant was distracting them??

My. God. If that woman had been distracting me, no way we would have even made it to the runway.

FIIGMO 07-06-2013 03:48 PM


Originally Posted by Timbo (Post 1440399)
RE. the crashed 777 in SFO, sounds like they were trasitioned to the inbord (28R) on final. WX looked good, but eye witness said they were low and slow (obviously) and was the GS up for the inboard?

I don't know if that one had the Rolls Royce engines, but several years ago there were issues with the fuel/oil heat exchanger, forming ice balls, which resulted in the BA 777 landing short. They pushed the power up and nothing happened, due to the ice in the fuel line. They were all supposed to be fixed several years ago.

FIXED NEWS!!!

Pathetic, "Bubble headed bleach blonde talks about the plane crash with a gleam in her eye""


Let's talk out of our A** some more!! Well, better find the BBC in ATL to get a reasonable account of the events...


Struck a nerve with those in the spin zone but, so tired of the BS!

Yes a cat rancher ate all the food on a 5:26 leg!!!! Ill feel better in a few after I eat and drink!!!:D

BlueMoon 07-06-2013 04:24 PM


Originally Posted by Timbo (Post 1440399)
RE. the crashed 777 in SFO, sounds like they were trasitioned to the inbord (28R) on final. WX looked good, but eye witness said they were low and slow (obviously) and was the GS up for the inboard?

I don't know if that one had the Rolls Royce engines, but several years ago there were issues with the fuel/oil heat exchanger, forming ice balls, which resulted in the BA 777 landing short. They pushed the power up and nothing happened, due to the ice in the fuel line. They were all supposed to be fixed several years ago.

Loc and GP notam'ed out of service for both 28's.

Justdoinmyjob 07-06-2013 05:09 PM


Originally Posted by Timbo (Post 1440399)
RE. the crashed 777 in SFO, sounds like they were trasitioned to the inbord (28R) on final. WX looked good, but eye witness said they were low and slow (obviously) and was the GS up for the inboard?

Well,if 777 pilots can't figure out that the inboard is 28 LEFT, not 28R, there's your problem rights there. :D

LOC/GS was notamed OTS.

80ktsClamp 07-06-2013 05:10 PM


Originally Posted by biigD (Post 1440411)
My. God. If that woman had been distracting me, no way we would have even made it to the runway.

Apparently the mains struck the rocky embankment at the beginning of the runway then the empennage. I really hope they didn't just come in low. The 777 sure seems like a stable plane on approach.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:24 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands