![]() |
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1441173)
That's pretty illogical... Follow me here:
The sim by nature is going to be mostly automated. You're typically dealing with abnormals and have to manage the aircraft appropriately. A higher level of automation is preferred when one guy is head down running the QRH and coordinating all the stuff that accompanies that. So, of course you don't get to hand fly a bunch in the sim since you're dealing with the aircraft breaking most of the time. Line operations are largely normal ops, right? So, it follows that a reduction in automation would not only be appropriate but encouraged during line operations until things go south. Hand flying is a minimal workload increase for the PM and I expect/anticipate the other guy to hand fly a while until proven otherwise. It's not that massive of a workload increase, even out of NYC or the like... I'd hardly call it a burden. As for the increase on the PM, well, maybe it's different on the bus, but when I've had the pilot flying do that on the 88 and I have to do checklists, change his heading bug, slow his airspeed, make the radio call, configure the acft, back him up on level offs, update the box for the jerry rigged VNAV, make sure we clear out that last altitude with the descend direct, etc., well, it kept me busy at times 20 miles out from ATL where I would have liked to have more scan time and less heads down time. Maybe another 3000 hours and I'll have a better handle on things. |
I can't find anything that says UAL 232 had passengers killed by ARFF responding to the accident. I've heard it. But don't see anything on it.
The corn fields on the airport property were there I believe for revenue but as we can imagine it's a bad idea when there's passengers walking through it while ARFF is trying to appropriately and quickly respond. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1441175)
Nicolau was the arbiter who did the SLI between USair and America West. It's referred to as the Nicolau list.
It was a more or less relative list sans the A330 slots that US brought to the merger. All people on furlough at US were given slots behind america west pilots. |
Originally Posted by GunshipGuy
(Post 1441184)
I agree with most of that. I was just answering the question about when full automation was pushed, and my experience was though out my sim training and on my OE.
As for the increase on the PM, well, maybe it's different on the bus, but when I've had the pilot flying do that on the 88 and I have to do checklists, change his heading bug, slow his airspeed, make the radio call, configure the acft, back him up on level offs, update the box for the jerry rigged VNAV, make sure we clear out that last altitude with the descend direct, etc., well, it kept me busy at times 20 miles out from ATL where I would have liked to have more scan time and less heads down time. Maybe another 3000 hours and I'll have a better handle on things. The 88 is definitely the busiest cockpit, so your aversion is definitely understandable there! The hand flying that early as you described there on approach is definitely more of a burden as there is a lot going on- on climb out and once established on approach.... no biggie, even on the angry dawg. That being said, when flying a visual approach, instead of managing all that crap, turning off the AP, FD, and AT is the least workload possible for the PM while the most rewarding for the PF no matter the fleet. :) It's by far my favorite when made available. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1441173)
That's pretty illogical (nothing personal- just it doesn't follow)... Follow me here:
The sim by nature is going to be mostly automated. You're typically dealing with abnormals and have to manage the aircraft appropriately. A higher level of automation is preferred when one guy is head down running the QRH and coordinating all the stuff that accompanies that. So, of course you don't get to hand fly a bunch in the sim since you're dealing with the aircraft breaking most of the time. Line operations are largely normal ops, right? So, it follows that a reduction in automation would not only be appropriate but encouraged during line operations until things go south. Hand flying is a minimal workload increase for the PM and I expect/anticipate the other guy to hand fly a while until proven otherwise. It's not that massive of a workload increase, even out of NYC or the like... I'd hardly call it a burden. I got this job because I like pressing buttons- not trying to avoid it. http://www.learningpool.com/wp-conte...-upstream1.jpg and on a line check http://odetocode.com/aimages/200807/salmon_2.jpg :D I may be exaggerating to be funny, but humor requires an element of truth, so maybe I'm not, but I am, but I'm not not, so i've covered all of my bases here. But look who hand flies the least statistically. That said, I hope, and it looks like, we may move in your desired direction. As long as you don't fart in our general direction. Again, humor requires an element of truth. Oh by the way, if this helps shine some light on the subject, Departure Briefing.... COMPLETE. Not completed. It's just complete. You keep saying completed. No D. |
BTW, it's Departure Briefing... COMPLETE. Not completed. Complete. No D.
/venting |
BTW, it's Departure Briefing... COMPLETE. Not completed. Complete. No D.
/venting |
Originally Posted by GunshipGuy
(Post 1441184)
I agree with most of that. I was just answering the question about when full automation was pushed, and my experience was though out my sim training and on my OE.
As for the increase on the PM, well, maybe it's different on the bus, but when I've had the pilot flying do that on the 88 and I have to do checklists, change his heading bug, slow his airspeed, make the radio call, configure the acft, back him up on level offs, update the box for the jerry rigged VNAV, make sure we clear out that last altitude with the descend direct, etc., well, it kept me busy at times 20 miles out from ATL where I would have liked to have more scan time and less heads down time. Maybe another 3000 hours and I'll have a better handle on things. I just hope we don't get barraged with memos and edicts from on high because of this, either way. |
Classic line of the nigh: so pilots have 32 hour layover. FAs have a 32 hour layover at the same hotel. All, don't know how, are hanging out together. FO's wife has come along for the trip.
FA jokingly says to the FO's wife: "why did the Delta pilots wives club allow the FAs and pilots to stay at the hotel together for 32 hours?" FO's wife: "oh I'm not concerned. In fact, I'd appreciate it if you could take care of it for me so I don't have to." :D |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1441193)
Well, I'm not going to point fingers in at any one particular fleet but autopilot OFF below 10K and judicious hand flying would make you like a
(too many images) and on a line check http://odetocode.com/aimages/200807/salmon_2.jpg :D I may be exaggerating to be funny, but humor requires an element of truth, so maybe I'm not, but I am, but I'm not not, so i've covered all of my bases here. But look who hand flies the least statistically. That said, I hope, and it looks like, we may move in your desired direction. As long as you don't fart in our general direction. Again, humor requires an element of truth. Strange how the 88 has seemingly strayed off the normal DL course since I was there. Statistically, the Airbus 320 fleet hand flies the lowest of all the fleets. I guess that's because we're never actually in control of what the airplane does. :eek: I also treat a line check/fed ride virtually the same as every flight. Keep the ball in bounds and they have no room to question you. If they do, question them right back respectfully. Enjoy the watching the backpeddle. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:28 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands