Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Can't abide NAI
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Carl,
Pineapple Guy is correct specifically because of the changes in ALPA policy in 1998. Prior to those changes Endeavor clearly would have been defined by our Association as an "alter ego." After those changes, Endeavor (and at the time ASA) would not. It is specifically those changes that resulted in union sanctioned alter ego's which resulted in a lot of our pilots' furloughs.
Then, I ask, would the DPA seek craft and class status on the members of the MEC which were our class and class when we merged. You stated:In that case the DPA would include the Compass pilots who were, representationally speaking, included in the craft and class of Delta pilots for the purposes of representation when we merged.
I think you forgot them (and you aren't alone in forgetting them).
Anyway, structurally, the DPA has no means of facilitating the kind of industry wide coordination of our interests that is needed to promote our profession.
Pineapple Guy is correct specifically because of the changes in ALPA policy in 1998. Prior to those changes Endeavor clearly would have been defined by our Association as an "alter ego." After those changes, Endeavor (and at the time ASA) would not. It is specifically those changes that resulted in union sanctioned alter ego's which resulted in a lot of our pilots' furloughs.
Then, I ask, would the DPA seek craft and class status on the members of the MEC which were our class and class when we merged. You stated:In that case the DPA would include the Compass pilots who were, representationally speaking, included in the craft and class of Delta pilots for the purposes of representation when we merged.
I think you forgot them (and you aren't alone in forgetting them).
Anyway, structurally, the DPA has no means of facilitating the kind of industry wide coordination of our interests that is needed to promote our profession.
I presume then, that in your opinion, so is Expressjet, Chataqua, Republic, Skywest and all the rest, since they are all performing flying which we permit in our Section 1?
Can't abide NAI
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
I didn't forget them at all. Look what you stated above. "When we merged." This question of Compass was asked and answered by the Delta MEC led by Mr. Moak. You know how that question was answered. Compass pilots were removed from representational possibility when we merged.
I understand what you were trying to accomplish there however.
Carl
I understand what you were trying to accomplish there however.
Carl
Pilots are beginning to provide the answers for ALPA in this regard. And panic appears to be setting in.
Carl
Can't abide NAI
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
First, I am an ALPA member and at the end of the day my union speaks for me. That's my official answer.
Among friends, I am one opinion out of 11,500 or so. My opinion pretty much is summed up in Flying the Line I & II. I grew up in this business ... when coming out of Lorenzo's Texas Air fiasco we formally declared that alter egos in any form to be the greatest threat to our profession and they were not to be tolerated under any circumstances.
I believe the changes in 1998 were wrong and will eventually destroy our union if left unchecked. The DPA is just the most recent boil which provides an objective indication of the deeper underlying pathology. Will this localized infection spread and kill it's host? I dunno, hope not.
Frankly, Contract 2012 and the recovery of Delta flying leads me to see objective signs of recovery, or at least progressive management of the disease. I figured the DPA, like a fever, would be on the decline with outward signs of improving conditions.
So yes in my opinion Endeavor is an "alter ego." If asked for a legal, or factual opinion (not that I'm licensed to practice anything) I would say that Endeavor is not currently considered an alter ego by anyone who matters.
Surely you can appreciate the difference.
I am sure not one regional guy would ever want any pilot to lose his job at DAL or any major. The more pilots positions reduced or removed at any major is also one less job available to the regional pilots trying to get on with the majors as positions or openings become available. So couldn't DAL pilots choose one DCI or try to combine all the DCI's into one and make them something like "B" scale DAL pilots? You can then have the same test and interview like it is now before moving up to the major side. That is everything remains like it is now for DAL pilots or better.
I dont agree with B scale, I dont agree with Regional Airlines flying BIG RJs either. When you are qualified, you INTERVIEW! Just like all of us. There is no easy way to make it. The only reason I see Delta and ALPA wanting flow throughs is that it introduces eager, former low paid, mediocre work rule exposed pilots to our Mainline list. This influx of eager pilots dilute our ranks. These new pilots would gladly accept 7 SC a month with pay raises of 4-8.5-3-3. This is the plan and the black helicopter just got shot down.

Jethikoki, sir, as I told you before, stop trying to find the easy way in. Stop comparing others ability to flow thru or merge thru. Concentrate on your talents, be diligent and award yourself with an offer of employment. It feels much better earned than having it handed to you.
Good Day.
TEN
Can't abide NAI
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Alter Ego airlines should have never been allowed in the first place. But, now that we have them there are two possible answers if we decide to repair the situation, negotiate contracts that their involvement in our "Company flying," or try to find ways to work with them and absorb them as we can. Of the two possible solutions (and I'm for either one) the second is more economically viable.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Nice while it lasted
Can someone explain this to me: I have a taxable amount of $44.03 on my paycheck for Delta provided life insurance ($500k, I believe). Now while I like the idea of getting "free" life insurance, a taxable amount of $88 a month seems pretty high. A 45 year old can lock in a $500k term policy for 20 years at about $25 a month (which would then take him out to age 65). Gotta wonder why the $88/mo value being placed on this benefit. What am I missing?
There are most certainly pilots on the list today who have returned from cancer, heart issues, etc., who would have a difficult, if not impossible time, finding life insurance. This company "freebie" may be the only game in town for them.
Lastly, the $88 is taxed at your marginal tax rate, so you are probably only paying $20 or so a month for it.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,058
Likes: 2
From: Capt
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





