|
|
Originally Posted by orvil
(Post 1530081)
Sorry, I don't know why but that's legal. That is why it's important to have the last day of the month off if you are on reserve. At least you will be back for Sunday dinner.
My guess is the two day GS would have cost the Company more than the one day GS. They will be paying you single pay. I bet it was a question of which one was cheaper. |
Originally Posted by Klondike Bear
(Post 1530066)
So I'm reserve this month and line holder next. I was on the one day reserve list and got assigned a two day for tomorrow. There was a one day that went out to a GS # 6. Scheduling said they can fly someone into the next month if they are reserve to line holder. I am trying to figure out why I didn't get the one day and the two day go to a GS.
We were going to do Thanksgiving on Sunday since I was on call, but the worst part is I will have to record the Iron Bowl. I feel your pain. I was good for 3 days yesterday and got assigned a 4 day trip. This after sitting 2 days of SC. I too hold a line next month. |
Originally Posted by flyallnite
(Post 1529813)
Our FAs are getting $20.00 per flight hour or $5.00 increase to per diem bump for all trips over the holidays... in addition to the prepaid visa cards for the surveys. They gave up nothing.
|
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1530156)
It doesn't matter what flight ops "wants." All that matters is the end result: what's in our paychecks and how many days off we have.
The same can be said for DALPA. Forget the results for now. We can't even get our "leaders" to make the case that we are worth way more than what we're currently being paid. Our collective goals are so low, they're achievable. Kinda the opposite of we're fast, but at least we're high. |
Originally Posted by index
(Post 1530176)
Exactly. It's the results that matter.
The same can be said for DALPA. Forget the results for now. We can't even get our "leaders" to make the case that we are worth way more than what we're currently being paid. Our collective goals are so low, they're achievable. Kinda the opposite of we're fast, but at least we're high. "Our goals are so low, they're achievable!" :D |
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 1530186)
LOL. You've unwittingly come up with the perfect slogan for DALPA...
"Our goals are so low, they're achievable!" :D |
Originally Posted by Klondike Bear
(Post 1530066)
So I'm reserve this month and line holder next. I was on the one day reserve list and got assigned a two day for tomorrow. There was a one day that went out to a GS # 6. Scheduling said they can fly someone into the next month if they are reserve to line holder. I am trying to figure out why I didn't get the one day and the two day go to a GS.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1530169)
It's a legal assignment. Sec 23.N.10. They can fly a reserve guy into his day off if he is transitioning to a line the next month. That comes before awarding GS flying. Then after GS award attempts they can fly a reserve into his/her X days. They gave you the 2 day because they can, and it's cheaper to GS the 1 day. It's stupid, and something we need to get fixed.
I feel your pain. I was good for 3 days yesterday and got assigned a 4 day trip. This after sitting 2 days of SC. I too hold a line next month. |
Just seems like more and more items we never really thought about because the company rarely if ever used are starting to crop up. This leads to more things we need to "fix" in our next negotiations thus diluting items we really want.
Just because it is legal doesn't mean it is right. |
Originally Posted by Dash8widget
(Post 1530219)
Similar thing just happened to me as well. The best part is that it's just straight pay for the flying that falls on your day off. I'm sorry, but if a pilot is assigned a trip that goes into a day off against his/her will, it should be double pay - PERIOD. :mad:
Originally Posted by The Cavalier
(Post 1530223)
That's such BS. They should have to offer a GS before involuntarily taking ANY pilot's off day away when assigning open time. Reserve v line holder shouldn't matter.
Originally Posted by PilotFrog
(Post 1530230)
Just seems like more and more items we never really thought about because the company rarely if ever used are starting to crop up. This leads to more things we need to "fix" in our next negotiations thus diluting items we really want.
Just because it is legal doesn't mean it is right. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:11 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands