Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Dash8widget 12-19-2013 10:13 AM


Originally Posted by Timbo (Post 1542828)
BUT...what if...you have a 30+ hr. layover during your first four day trip, say on day 2-3, then you roll right into a three day trip as soon as you get home?

OUCH!:eek:

You had 30 hours off during your trip to get all rested up - what are you complaining about?! :rolleyes:

Timbo 12-19-2013 10:13 AM


Originally Posted by Timbo (Post 1542611)
Quick PCS/Swap Board Question:

I've got a spillout trip end of Jan, I don't want it, but since it goes into Feb, I don't think I can get rid of it via PCS (tomorrow) or on the swap board, until after -next month's- bid runs and PCS runs begin, as in Jan. 20th, is that correct?

Well I just heard back from the DALPA Scheduling guy. Turns out in a "Normal Month" it would swap a carry out trip, but due to Feb. 2 being Super Bowl Sunday, and one of the true "Capped Holidays" (like Christmas, July 4, New Years, etc.), it will NOT swap or drop any carry out trip you have that goes over Feb. 2 on the early PCS runs, starting tomorrow.

He said it might do it come January 20th, after the Feb. bids are done, if they have adequate reserve coverage for Feb. 2. So, I'll have to wait until Jan. 20 to try to dump it. I wasn't aware Feb. 2 is Superbowl Sunday, I have no delusions that the Patsies will be in it, so I wasn't trying to get off for that.

Feb. 2 is also my Son's 21st birthday, I was planing us a trip to Vegas, get him some hookers and blow. I guess that'll have to wait...:rolleyes::D

Dash8widget 12-19-2013 10:19 AM


Originally Posted by Scoop (Post 1542770)
No you can not. Per FAR 117 you need:

30 Consecutive hours free from all duty within the 168 consecutive
hour period prior to beginning an FDP or starting short call.


168 is basically a 7 day week. The 30 hour period can be at the front end of a trip but I don't see how this is possible with a 4 day trip followed by a 3 day trip. That situation would be possible only with two 3 day trips.

Unless there is something unusual going on with deadheads or possible a warp in the space time continuum, you need a 30 hour break in there somewhere.

See the bulletin the company e-mailed out today.

I would definitely take a good long look at it before flying it as you have described.

Scoop

Report on day one at 1600, release on day 7 at 0900. If my math is correct, you just worked 137 hours which means you had at least 30 hours off in the previous 168. You worked 7 days in a row without a 30 hour layover and it's perfectly legal.

Scoop 12-19-2013 10:36 AM


Originally Posted by Dash8widget (Post 1542844)
Report on day one at 1600, release on day 7 at 0900. If my math is correct, you just worked 137 hours which means you had at least 30 hours off in the previous 168. You worked 7 days in a row without a 30 hour layover and it's perfectly legal.



You need 30 Consecutive hours off.


Scoop

Roadkill 12-19-2013 10:41 AM

Yep, I have a 3 day followed by a 4 day with 25 hours off between release and report. However, the 3 day has a 31 hr layo, and the 4 day has a 34 hr layo, so I'm "good to go!".
It's not 30 hrs of BLOCK now, they don't care about block... it's 60hrs of FLIGHT DUTY PERIODs, and guess what? a 30 hour layo is NOT a FDP, it's an opportunity for your to recharge your batteries away from home in a crppy hotel room, at no cost to the company...
We do need to make that time away from home cost the company something, and get paid for it.

Bucking Bar 12-19-2013 10:52 AM


Originally Posted by Roadkill (Post 1542859)
something, and get paid for it.

Yes. A lot of 31 to 34 hour sits to fly one leg back to base ... not efficient.

With so many long sits commuting home, or to job #2, mid rotation might become an option for some.

gloopy 12-19-2013 11:11 AM


Originally Posted by iaflyer (Post 1542809)
While the company probably isn't going to knowingly violate you, with new types of limits and different wording for similar limits, we all gotta be careful.

Absolutely. Even now after how many decades and computer backups and supervisors, etc. they still occasionally get some of the basic FAR stuff wrong. These next few months will be a huge CYA exercise, especially with the company attempting to push us into contractually illegal mandates to overcome self induced logistical issues.

Dash8widget 12-19-2013 11:20 AM


Originally Posted by Scoop (Post 1542856)
You need 30 Consecutive hours off.


Scoop

Take a look at my example again - there are 30 consecutive hours off at the beginning. After the pilot had worked his 7 days, he had 137 hours without a 30 hour rest. But, that's ok because he DID have 30+ consecutive hours of rest in the previous 168. 168 - 137 = 31. In a 168 hour look back upon his release on day 7, he had 31 consecutive hours of rest - at the beginning. In other words, you can go 138 hours before needing a 30 break in duty.

johnso29 12-19-2013 11:31 AM


Originally Posted by Timbo (Post 1542839)
Feb. 2 is also my Son's 21st birthday, I was planing us a trip to Vegas, get him some hookers and blow. I guess that'll have to wait...:rolleyes::D

You're the best dad ever!!! :D

sailingfun 12-19-2013 11:33 AM


Originally Posted by Dash8widget (Post 1542844)
Report on day one at 1600, release on day 7 at 0900. If my math is correct, you just worked 137 hours which means you had at least 30 hours off in the previous 168. You worked 7 days in a row without a 30 hour layover and it's perfectly legal.

If you worked 7 days in a row you could not exceed 60 hours on duty. If there were 6 duty periods in your example they would have to average under 10 hours each. Possible but probably not the norm.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:33 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands