Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2013 | 10:36 AM
  #145271  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,263
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by Dash8widget
Report on day one at 1600, release on day 7 at 0900. If my math is correct, you just worked 137 hours which means you had at least 30 hours off in the previous 168. You worked 7 days in a row without a 30 hour layover and it's perfectly legal.


You need 30 Consecutive hours off.


Scoop
Old 12-19-2013 | 10:41 AM
  #145272  
Roadkill's Avatar
meh
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
Default

Yep, I have a 3 day followed by a 4 day with 25 hours off between release and report. However, the 3 day has a 31 hr layo, and the 4 day has a 34 hr layo, so I'm "good to go!".
It's not 30 hrs of BLOCK now, they don't care about block... it's 60hrs of FLIGHT DUTY PERIODs, and guess what? a 30 hour layo is NOT a FDP, it's an opportunity for your to recharge your batteries away from home in a crppy hotel room, at no cost to the company...
We do need to make that time away from home cost the company something, and get paid for it.
Old 12-19-2013 | 10:52 AM
  #145273  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by Roadkill
something, and get paid for it.
Yes. A lot of 31 to 34 hour sits to fly one leg back to base ... not efficient.

With so many long sits commuting home, or to job #2, mid rotation might become an option for some.
Old 12-19-2013 | 11:11 AM
  #145274  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by iaflyer
While the company probably isn't going to knowingly violate you, with new types of limits and different wording for similar limits, we all gotta be careful.
Absolutely. Even now after how many decades and computer backups and supervisors, etc. they still occasionally get some of the basic FAR stuff wrong. These next few months will be a huge CYA exercise, especially with the company attempting to push us into contractually illegal mandates to overcome self induced logistical issues.
Old 12-19-2013 | 11:20 AM
  #145275  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: SLC ERB
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
You need 30 Consecutive hours off.


Scoop
Take a look at my example again - there are 30 consecutive hours off at the beginning. After the pilot had worked his 7 days, he had 137 hours without a 30 hour rest. But, that's ok because he DID have 30+ consecutive hours of rest in the previous 168. 168 - 137 = 31. In a 168 hour look back upon his release on day 7, he had 31 consecutive hours of rest - at the beginning. In other words, you can go 138 hours before needing a 30 break in duty.
Old 12-19-2013 | 11:31 AM
  #145276  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
Feb. 2 is also my Son's 21st birthday, I was planing us a trip to Vegas, get him some hookers and blow. I guess that'll have to wait...
You're the best dad ever!!!
Old 12-19-2013 | 11:33 AM
  #145277  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,876
Likes: 193
Default

Originally Posted by Dash8widget
Report on day one at 1600, release on day 7 at 0900. If my math is correct, you just worked 137 hours which means you had at least 30 hours off in the previous 168. You worked 7 days in a row without a 30 hour layover and it's perfectly legal.
If you worked 7 days in a row you could not exceed 60 hours on duty. If there were 6 duty periods in your example they would have to average under 10 hours each. Possible but probably not the norm.
Old 12-19-2013 | 11:37 AM
  #145278  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Possible but probably not the norm.
Where have we heard that before.
Old 12-19-2013 | 11:38 AM
  #145279  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,876
Likes: 193
Default

Originally Posted by Dash8widget
I didn't realize that WSC was a legally binding document - I thought that it just served to help explain the scheduling provisions of our contract. From what I can find, the 9 hour leash is NOT codified in the PWA, it's IMPLIED as a MINIMUM leash thanks to the 3 hour prior acknowledgment requirement. As an example - let's say I'm on long call, and I noticed that I missed a call from scheduling so I use my iCrewMax app to unofficially check my schedule. And let's say that I notice, unofficially, that they have assigned a trip that reports 24 hours from now. I now have 21 hours before I have to officially acknowledge the assignment, not 9. Correct?
WSC was approved by both the company and DALPA as a explanation and supplement to the contract. You can bet that the arbitrator will see the document and the company will have to explain why their interpretation then is different then now. WSC states that you always have at least 9 hours between schedule checks or returning a company call. It can be more but never less.
Old 12-19-2013 | 11:49 AM
  #145280  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: SLC ERB
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
WSC was approved by both the company and DALPA as a explanation and supplement to the contract. You can bet that the arbitrator will see the document and the company will have to explain why their interpretation then is different then now. WSC states that you always have at least 9 hours between schedule checks or returning a company call. It can be more but never less.
Good to know - thanks!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices