![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1552313)
In reality, an auto-extension is not an extension at all, but a longer scheduled day that bypasses the intent of the rule.
In other news, they discovered why dogs spin in circles before doing #2. Apparently dog poop is aligned with magnetic north ... who knew? Mystery solved: Why dogs spin in circles before doing their business |
Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob
(Post 1551916)
Keep in mind that the free travel is only for coach and it is first come, first served, based on check in time. You have to check in up to 12 hours prior, so you could be up at 2-3 am trying to log on to get at the front of the line. Could be an issue for guys overseas , trying to check in for a commute home. You want first class, pony up the bucks. And jumpseat is seniority based. Have the jumpseat on an oversold flight? Sorry, if someone is senior to you, up til departure you can be bumped.
Where the grass looks greener, it's usually over the septic tank. |
Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob
(Post 1552315)
Yes, yes it is. That is how American does it. Non rev is based on check in time, up to 12 hours prior, jumpseat is by seniority, up to departure.
|
Originally Posted by DFW Refugee
(Post 1552325)
Actually, it's up to 24 hours prior. (The Mrs. is an AA F/A.)
|
Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob
(Post 1552320)
The union was in the JFK lounge yesterday doing a presentation on this. Didn't catch the whole thing, but from what I understand, that is the company's take. By signing the release, we both agree to the extension. If the captain subsequently disagrees, he has to let the dispatcher know. If the FO subsequently disagrees, they need to call in fatigued. The union disagrees with this interpretation.
Considering the opportunity to get meaningful change adopted to reduce fatigue only seems to come along once in a pilots lifetime it seems this should be a top priority to include publicly placed press releases that the airlines are subverting the intent of the new fatigue rules. |
Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
(Post 1552348)
Did the union mention when a letter writing campaign to the government regulators (along with trying to stop the pre clearance facility in Abu Dhabi) will begin to get this properly addressed? Clearly the intent is being missed here.
Considering the opportunity to get meaningful change adopted to reduce fatigue only seems to come along once in a pilots lifetime it seems this should be a top priority to include publicly placed press releases that the airlines are subverting the intent of the new fatigue rules. |
Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob
(Post 1552353)
From what I got, discussions with the company were ongoing to resolve the misinterpretations. When or if they bear fruit wasn't speculated on.
|
Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
(Post 1552358)
OK, hopefully this ends up going the way it was intended and not watered down to become worthless. Just like the SD memo, which btw seems to be working, the company generally gets the productivity they want in the end. If not, more required carpet dances until they do.
|
Originally Posted by flyallnite
(Post 1551918)
I got so fed up reading all the anti-pilot, anti-union diatribe in what seemed almost every issue I finally cancelled my subscription.
So is it because of the return of manufacturing to the US, the rise of 3D printing or the new, mega huge cargo ships that cut shipping costs to pennies per unit? |
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:43 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands