Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1563081)

Or he could have been dumpster diving. Many (most?) of those lanyards went straight into the trash.

Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 1563143)

Don't call those numbers on the lav wall.:p

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1563115)

You two are about the same height... how did you decide who was going to be little spoon?

Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1563205)

seniority.

i swear i heard "don't complain you'll be senior one day."

Originally Posted by NuGuy (Post 1563107)

There is a significant amount of "churn" during each PCS run.

It may have showed 20/20 before the run, and 20/20 after, but when it processed your request, it was above the requirement.

I've had PDs awarded when there was clearly not enough coverage at the start of the run. It just depends on what the coverage looks like when it gets to YOUR request. That's why you always try, even if it looks like it won't float.

FWIW, there was a resolution passed recently to change the way the PCS works. Rather than just one pass through the requests per PCS run (except for swaps, which are run twice if a swap is awarded), the resolution calls for changing the language to have 2 passes per PCS run.

The net effect of this will be to "shake out the churn" and allow more requests to be awarded per run due to trips, reserve days and reserve coverage that becomes available during the first pass.

Nu

Originally Posted by RockyBoy (Post 1562950)

One thing that would be nice to get is allowing swaps if we swap into a "worse" coverage situation. A lot of times I have wanted to swap a trip that was even on coverage for one that was on days that were negative. Still won't allow it.