Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 03-11-2014 | 04:21 PM
  #151271  
TheManager's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
Just got done reading the latest True Headings.

Predictably DPA pulled another ready, fire aim on the whole Lee Moak "makes > $1M a year" lie they put out last week.

Anybody still hitching their cart to that horse? TheManager, anything to add? Care to send TC a message that we're over this BS and ready to move forward together towards C2015?

Btw, for those that didn't read the True headings, the crux was there was a mandatory IRS rule applied to an annuity that resulted in a large imputed income amount being listed on the form that DPA was referencing. Lee didn't see an extra penny, much less the 48% pay bump they claim.

So much for them putting in "hours of research on your behalf." <------Direct quote from the opening paragraph of the DPA Crew Van News/Lies...
Well, LL, your reading comprehension is now suspect as demonstrated by your post above. I've been an ALPA member for close to 25 years now. I support them. I also know they need to change, or tweak a few things to keep up with the times and issues we live with today.

Allow me to refresh your recollection, L2.



Originally Posted by Timbo

That's it in a nutshell. As I've said many times here, nobody at National wants to rock the boat. You want to know why?

Isn't DuhWayne Worthless an Industry Lobbyist now?

And Randy Babbit had a Government job for awhile too...

An SOS should have happened long before the US Air pension grab. ALPA should have protected the CAL pilots jobs when they went on strike in 1983, and the EAL pilots jobs in 1989, when they stood up to Frank Lorenzo.

But, Frank Lorenzo was a Houston business man, and one of his good friends was (and still is) George Bush Sr.



My reply to Timbo.


Sadly, it will never happen now. I checked in on Ben's board last night and threw up a little in my mouth.

Apparently Lee Moak had 1,278,000 reasons not "to rock the boat at national" last year, or probably ever.

I am an ALPA supporter, but that is obscene and indefensible. Before that little bomb shell went off I would have said DPA was in grave condition on life support and drifting into the dirt nap.

That movement just snapped out of it and sat up straight in bed while yanking out the IVs. Phuque! Just when I thought they were in the death swirl in the bowl and gonna be gone.

Why is this bad? Here's why!

That little Moak nugget set back any chance at unity building for a long time. So much for getting our $hit together before section 6.

So ****ed I'd kick the dog if I had one. Might have to let the cat out back instead. There are a set of hawks building a nest in one of my palm trees!




I have not read the True Headings. I hope there is a great explanation to diffuse this. That would be great.

What would have been excellent is getting out in front of the issue with a True Headings. How about having the numbers broken down with explanations before TC and followers could exploit it.
Old 03-11-2014 | 04:23 PM
  #151272  
Alan Shore's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Is it really possible under the PWA to check one's schedule without acknowledging it? I gotta think it's tough to answer the mail on that when the CPO calls.
Absolutely!! This has been upheld time and time again. Checking one's schedule is NOT tantamount to notification.

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
When I'm on reserve, I'll just keep on setting my alarm for 0155 to check my schedule, until the LOA is done. Gives the negotiators some leverage.
No need that I can see. Just don't respond to a phone call until nine hours later.
Old 03-11-2014 | 04:32 PM
  #151273  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
It's not certified for that type of operation, but theoretically it could...during descent on path, the flt control computer takes constant stabilized vector path updates. If you lost all rnav input, the vector would freeze in its last known stabilized state. There is some time limit to this, but no wind, it shouldn't matter. The flare is done off altitude. So theoretically it could auto land out of an rnav.

There may however be a lack of programming logic for that maneuver. The way an rnav or gps approach is set up to work in the aircraft logic is that (assuming you don't click off the autopilot at da minus 50) is to fly down the descent path down the centerline, level off at 50 ft agl and fly down the centerline of the runway.

IOW, don't try it.
Well I tried it on the 717. Doesn't work.





717 = aerosim vfd. Close to the ground it says "screw you buddy" and runs to the join the black box for the flare. Whether that's what the real machine does, I dunno. But if they were using the RNAV and pulled the CBs for the other stuff, makes me wonder if a satelite can say "yeah man, I talked to GPS receiver X4124891DF1029 at 02:21.04 and he was here, and at .05 here..." ?
Old 03-11-2014 | 04:36 PM
  #151274  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: MD musical chairs
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
Going off the interactions I've had with DPA members in person, I can say emphatically that they have been successful in creating a group more bothersome than DALPA.
The irony is that DPA criticizes DALPA for the same exact things they make it a habit of practicing.
They're our very own Hare Krishnas coming to the vicinity of a crew room near you.
Old 03-11-2014 | 04:55 PM
  #151275  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by The Cavalier
They're our very own Hare Krishnas coming to the vicinity of a crew room near you.
Funniest post of the week....
Old 03-11-2014 | 05:03 PM
  #151276  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default


in defense of the movie, I enjoyed it. But my kids love it. So I love it.
Old 03-11-2014 | 05:05 PM
  #151277  
Timbo's Avatar
Runs with scissors
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Well I tried it on the 717. Doesn't work.





717 = aerosim vfd. Close to the ground it says "screw you buddy" and runs to the join the black box for the flare. Whether that's what the real machine does, I dunno. But if they were using the RNAV and pulled the CBs for the other stuff, makes me wonder if a satelite can say "yeah man, I talked to GPS receiver X4124891DF1029 at 02:21.04 and he was here, and at .05 here..." ?

We were going into Dubai last week, it was the F/O's leg but he needed to fill the Cat III App. square, so we did an autoland to fill the square.

The wx was clear and a million, a slight crosswind, maybe 8kts from the left, but a steady wind, zero turb. It flared smoothly, put the left main down very, very gently, then the right, then lowered the nose very gently. We were all stunned at how nice it was!

WOW!

It was the nicest autoland I've ever seen!

Now, sure, the 777 is the easiest, softest landing plane that I have flown, but usually when we do an autoland, it's firm. Not hard, but you know you've landed. So does everyone in the back. I'd give it a 7 out of 10.

I don't know if maybe there was a little gust in the flare or what, but I have never seen an autoland like that! It just rolled on so gently, left main first, then the right, slowly, you could barely tell we were on the ground. It was an 11!

That was so sweet I think I'd let it try to land out of an RNAV, or heck, even autoland out of a visual, with the autopilot off, just like the Asiana guys did!

What could go wrong?
Old 03-11-2014 | 05:27 PM
  #151278  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 0
From: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Can a 777 autoland on an RNAV approach?

Former MD-88 pilot here, we can't autoland an MD90 on an ILS. Although, you can select it.
What..... the MD90 can't autoland???? First I've heard of it.
Old 03-11-2014 | 05:46 PM
  #151279  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Default

it was the F/O's leg but he needed to fill the Cat III App

Figures. His only chance at landing a 777 all year and he's got to do the autoland.
Old 03-11-2014 | 06:08 PM
  #151280  
Timbo's Avatar
Runs with scissors
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Default

Originally Posted by casual observer
it was the F/O's leg but he needed to fill the Cat III App

Figures. His only chance at landing a 777 all year and he's got to do the autoland.
That's funny and may even be true. I've always given away a lot more landings that I've taken. I only take one per month, give the other two to the F/O's. Nobody is getting many landings when there are always 4 pilots and only two landings.

I was an F/O on the MD11 so I know how hard it is to get a landing, that's why I give away 2 out of 3. The good news is, if you've spent a lot of time on the 767/757, you don't need many on the 777 to stay sharp, it's the same thing, only easier!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices