![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1641951)
Hire more seniority list instructors? Start scooping up as much sim time as is available throughout the country and the world?
With all due respect, it's not that hard.:confused: |
Originally Posted by sinca3
(Post 1641962)
The way I understood it is that it's a physical training problem ( classrooms and sims) not a personnel problem. I think other sim time is being looked at as an option.
FWIW, I do see posting for SLIs in DeltaNet. That's a good sign. And I'm guessing that the Company will come to us for more NSLIs in Section 6. JUST SAY NO!!! |
Originally Posted by badflaps
(Post 1641960)
Has anyone done the numbers on the profit-share loss?
|
Originally Posted by sinca3
(Post 1641962)
The way I understood it is that it's a physical training problem ( classrooms and sims) not a personnel problem. I think other sim time is being looked at as an option.
|
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1641966)
I would assume so. To which numbers are you referring?
|
Originally Posted by orvil
(Post 1641968)
Respectfully, why are we discussing how to fix this? It's not our job. That's why there are managers. They manage assets or acquire additional assets (sims, classrooms, instructors). Let them manage. that's what they get well paid to do.
|
Case in point, in 1985 when I was bobbing around Tx. in the 73, there was another 73 outfit giving us a hard time. I went over to G.O. and had a talk. They said they were not concerned...We all know how that worked out.
|
Originally Posted by orvil
(Post 1641968)
Respectfully, why are we discussing how to fix this? It's not our job. That's why there are managers. They manage assets or acquire additional assets (sims, classrooms, instructors). Let them manage. that's what they get well paid to do.
Otherwise, I see us faced with the age-old question, "Why won't you help us? Do you really want to see us cut capacity due to a lack of trained pilots?" |
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1641984)
Agreed. But the Company will almost certainly come to us for concessions that would somehow reduce the amount of upcoming training required, and I would prefer to help point them in a different direction while there's still time.
Otherwise, I see us faced with the age-old question, "Why won't you help us? Do you really want to see us cut capacity due to a lack of trained pilots?" "There is a very easy way to eliminate most of your training issues, forever; pay everyone 777/747 pay." That will eliminate the need to keep bidding up to higher paying aircraft to enhance your earnings. Everyone could bid what base/aircraft they like the most and stay there forever. The company is always coming to us expecting us to solve the problems they created. I say, "Fine, but pay us FIRST, then we'll talk about fixing your problems." Or tell them to call Pauli... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XGAmPRxV48 |
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1641953)
3% increase plus a loss of profit sharing? How often need we do math in public for you to get you to understand (and acknowledge) that the loss of profit sharing was offset against the 8.5% increase in 2013 and that each of the 3% increases are net on top of that?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:42 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands