![]() |
|
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 1659853)
Business case and hypothetical situation number #1:
Ask yourself one question: If Delta Pilots are unhappy, what happens to the stock price? (That's what matters to this management group.) |
Originally Posted by LivingTheDream
(Post 1659865)
I don't think we have a prayer of succeeding, if we go in as 11500+ individuals.
I thought we were in a union... I.e., shouldn't it be about obtaining the goals of a group of 11500+ vice the goals of 11500+ individuals. (BTW, I have no idea what my unions goals are... except maybe imposing CDO's on us! And that is very sad.) Finally, when we were going for the infamous contract 2000, the union was very public about announcing our goals and very methodical in our approach to achieving those goals... I still have my "restoration" tie tack. I doubt I'll ever hear the term restoration or any similar term from my union for the remainder of my career... and if the membership keeps voting for 3% pay increases, we won't even keep up with real inflation (including food & energy). It is what it is. sorry for the rant |
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 1659882)
Why do you think people buy Delta stock? I'm not an expert and this just my opinion (thanks index :) ) , but to me, people buy Delta stock because we offer a superior product compared to the other airlines. Every other airline of note is in a shambles, right now. (United, American, & Southwest-- the other airlines and cargo company's aren't really our competitors.) Plus, our management team has a great reputation. I still have all of my Delta stock, because I see what goes on here everyday.
If we, the drivers -- in more ways than one -- become unhappy, it could serve as a signal to investors that things aren't so great in Deltaland and management does not want that. They have been batting near 1.000, since the merger, and it has paid dividends. We should be seeking substantial improvements in our contract. I don't care what they other airlines are doing. Your last point is well taken, and I don't disagree. I truly believe we will get substantial gains in C15. But we cannot ignore what the other airlines are doing. It just doesn't work that way. UAL/AAL/SWA have got to raise the bar in some areas. We cannot go alone each and every contract patterning against ourselves. Don't you get tired of having everybody else benefit by what WE do? I still want to be the premier group, but it's time for somebody else to at least do SOMETHING. |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1659903)
It's not a question of you being a surrender monkey or some other name. It's that you're not supportive of being in a union. You're only supportive of being in an association that pretends to occasionally act like a union. Your mindset has been changed (or maybe you've always been this way) to that of an investor class and independent contractor. You believe that what's best for management will ultimately trickle down to employees and be best for them. And if employees don't like it, then quit.
It's hard to tell whether your belief system is the Delta pilot majority, or whether mine is. But it's clear our association is "all in" on the concept of partnering with management, and that shows no sign of changing. Carl And how dare you ever accuse me of not wanting what's best for this pilot group. If it comes down to a strike vote, contrary to what you have publicly stated, I will walk the walk with my brothers. Even you. Your problem is that you want to go nuclear before you even hear a gunshot. I think you even relish that concept. You hate dALPA because they do things differently than you are used to. You feel it ineffective because you don't see management with a bloody nose and you feel that a necessary by product of successful labor relations. Sad really. Show me a better contract in the industry right now. Any one. I'll wait. And then let's look at the relationships that their pilots have with their management. It has nothing to do with trickle down economics or anything like that Carl.. it's all about timing. Look at your watch. It ain't time yet. |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1659934)
Not sure of what case you're trying to make here Splash, but it's an indefensible position to suggest that members should never see the results of their own opinions.
Carl If they release survey results, fine. Whatever. It serves no useful purpose, but if it makes Carl happy, by all means we should release it. I need something to keep the oil off my garage floor anyway. |
Originally Posted by FlyZ
(Post 1659514)
Alan, I think sharing the results helps individual voters decide if their desires or minimums are in line with the rest of the pilot group. Let's say I had a personal minimum raise set of 25% over the contract, the TA came back with 18%, and the survey results showed that most of the pilot group would have been happy with 15%. I would consider our group in the aggregate to be more realistic than my view alone, and would likely change my vote to yes. It would help me have faith that ALPA did everything possible in the negotiations and that they met the majority's goals.
Some might say, well then, your personal minimum was not 25%. I can live on what we make right now. However, I think the average of the Delta pilots' opinions would be a very good indicator of what we are actually worth, just as the market determines stock price. That number should be made public. Respectfully submitted. |
Originally Posted by tsquare[/QUOTE
Show me a better contract in the industry right now. Any one. I'll wait.
And then let's look at the relationships that their pilots have with their management. So what exactly is the "time value" of a good relationship with management? |
Show me a better contract in the industry right now. Any one. I'll wait.
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1660069)
southwest. Fed ex.
Who cares what the relationship with the company is? (Besides RA, that is.) A good relationship won't pay for my kids' braces. Feel good lovefests between RA and ALPA won't pay for your generic Viagra. Do you even think about what you write? |
I've seen guys that bid reserve don't have a regular line bid preference in. Does anyone know if I can (not) bid a regular (full) line and instead start my bid with a Reduced lower limit bid?
I don't want reserve in July, but I don't want much of a line either. And yes, I know I could drop what I don't want after the bid, that's not the question. |
probably will stay in stick shaker for quite some time. But their network is far superior to
Your last point is well taken, and I don't disagree. I truly believe we will get substantial gains in C15. But we cannot ignore what the other airlines are doing. It just doesn't work that way. UAL/AAL/SWA have got to raise the bar in some areas. We cannot go alone each and every contract patterning against ourselves. Don't you get tired of having everybody else benefit by what WE do? I still want to be the premier group, but it's time for somebody else to at least do SOMETHING.[/QUOTE] I think it matters less and less what the other airlines are doing. This management team has consistently said we want to be viewed as a leading transport company not just an airline company. So let's use that when we demand our restoration. Management cannot say to investors we are a leading transport company and tell us in negotiation we are an average airline. Pay up |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:42 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands