![]() |
|
I hate to change the subject from FAR 117 and bashing each other over the contract, but there is another call to action about NAI going on. I realize these things get repetitive, but it's time to let the Senate know our stance. Please take a minute this weekend to log and click the button (or mash it if you're in ATL). Takes just a little of your time and it could very well protect our careers. Thanks!
|
Thanks for the advice on bidding, fellas! I just backdoored my B, and for the first time ever, I won't have to rabidly play the drop/swap PCS game. :)
|
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1664892)
What am I missing here? I thought the FAA said that our automatic extension policy was illegal. Both pilots have to agree to an extension and both pilots have to sign a new release. Look at scenario number two in this letter:
http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...rpretation.pdf Check, you are not missing anything. The "automatic extension" policy is contrary to the FAA's interpretation of 117. If you sign the release before knowing about an extension, that signature does NOT mean that you approve any subsequent extension - no matter what the company says. You can only approve an extension AFTER you know about it. |
So a few years back Sailing writes the CEO a letter....they call him down to Hooterville to talk about it...they assign an intern to give him some grammar and spelling lessons....pay the kid fifty bucks....a few years later he writes another letter...they call him down again, they want the fifty bucks back. OK seriously though...I think he is one of the good guys and respect how he hangs in here.
|
Originally Posted by erk13
(Post 1664943)
So a few years back Sailing writes the CEO a letter....they call him down to Hooterville to talk about it...they assign an intern to give him some grammar and spelling lessons....pay the kid fifty bucks....a few years later he writes another letter...they call him down again, they want the fifty bucks back. OK seriously though...I think he is one of the good guys and respect how he hangs in here.
|
Originally Posted by CheapTrick
(Post 1664886)
Semantics. You didn't have the big boy cojones to tell the Captain that you weren't going. You didn't have the professionalism to walk off the airplane and make the call. And now you blame DAPLA?? Look in the mirror.
|
Originally Posted by Spudhauler
(Post 1664902)
I hate to change the subject from FAR 117 and bashing each other over the contract, but there is another call to action about NAI going on. I realize these things get repetitive, but it's time to let the Senate know our stance. Please take a minute this weekend to log and click the button (or mash it if you're in ATL). Takes just a little of your time and it could very well protect our careers. Thanks!
|
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1664953)
I didn't want to extend. I told my captain. He said I had no reason not to extend as it was his leg and we were only going over by about 18 minutes (ended up only being :11) so I took the path of least resistance. The release we signed had an earlier departure time. They pushed our time back twice waiting for pax. I signed the release before I knew were going into our extension. I told the captain this is not legal per FARs. He called crew tracking who told him it was. Captain then disagreed with me. I stopped arguing and just flew flight. I feel we have an illegal and broken system. That is why I am posting this. I feel we should have been given a new release. I honestly felt like refusing the extension would have been way more hassle than it was worth. If my own captain is against me, then I figure everyone's against me.
|
Originally Posted by Ferd149
(Post 1664742)
Any rumors/wags on the Surface pads?
R1 |
Originally Posted by Razor
(Post 1664960)
I suggest you don't post anymore about it on this public forum and call ALPA tomorrow.
The thing about fatigue is that it is insidious. The other pilot might not realize they are impaired to the degree that they are. Studies show flying drunk is less dangerous than flying fatigued. How many would watch a crew member pound about six in a bar before walking to the gate? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:49 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands