![]() |
|
I changed the pic. The original pic the llama said nope, nope, nu uh, can't deal with it, nope, # you sheep.
So I changed it. |
|
Hey... I beat you to the crab legs photoshop from a certain game. :)
Gotta come up with some more, ftb! |
|
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1674664)
I'm still trying to figure out if sailingfun is a management mouthpiece or a Dalpa sentry. Or both interchangeably?
Whatever he is, one thing is certain: he's no friend of the line pilot. Here is what I don't understand. It's clear you want to be at war with management yet you seem to worship SWAPA who were the pioneers of the concept of working with management. DALPA tries for a new model somewhat based on SWAPA and produces a result that puts us at the top of the industry not long after being in chapter 11. Not a single airline in the last 15 years taking your approach has accomplished much of anything. Once again I have to go with reality and results. I want the most money and best quality of life I can get within the realities of working under the RLA. What we are doing has produced a remarkable result. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1674673)
http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/a...d/TEMP1-42.png
and http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/a...d/temp2-35.png By the way I fought hard to not allow the 76 seater at the mainline however a noted DPA supporter who was the MEC chairman at the time allowed the gross weight increase. Maybe we should call them DPA jets! |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1674638)
In 2012 they had 153 76-seaters and we had 722 mainline jets. They now have 172 76-seaters and we have 742 mainline jets. Under the previous PWA scope, how many 76-seaters would they be allowed to have right now with a mainline fleet of 742 jets?
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1674744)
I understand that. It also looks like we are going up to 850 aircraft in the mainline. It's also a number that's easily manipulated by the company. The old contract allowed for resets going up but not down. The new contract requires resets both ways.
But what would the ratio actually be? Heck what is it now? Actually, I may be able to answer that, or be close... |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1674701)
Hey... I beat you to the crab legs photoshop from a certain game. :)
Gotta come up with some more, ftb! http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-w3PXGyeb4S...jameis1gif.jpg |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1674747)
My issue though is if we go to 850 Jets and say they only do 193 76-seaters, off memory I think the min ratio is 1.3.
But what would the ratio actually be? Q |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:28 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands