Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 06-30-2014 | 10:47 AM
  #161431  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: Short Bus FO
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Maybe instead of trying to take away the American taxpayer subsidies to EK and the other fake royal emerati, we can just lobby for a "me too" clause. To include blanket immunity from those pesky US labor laws and litigation of course.

We can fly hourly brand new 777-300's to every dot on the map with nothing but hot 20 year old skinny FA's too, to please big strong western businessman, for great success!
All your hub are belong to us!
Old 06-30-2014 | 10:53 AM
  #161432  
newKnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
You and Sailing are pretty brave selling concessions and lowering expectations while hiding your names.

Soon, if not already, you two management water boys will be selling profit sharing reductions for hourly pay increases (cost neutral for management) and pay banding. Pay banding won't harm either of you, but will be a concession that costs the rest of us over 1000 jobs and 2 to 3 years of stagnation.

Don't know how you look in the mirror. You have yours, now pull up the ladder.

Jerry Fielding

PS you two will be selling us out on sick time as well. The trifecta of management's concession list.
After a certain amount of time on here, everyone kind of figures out who's who. I don't think Ts, or sailing, posts anything on here anymore with the expectation of being anonymous.

After all of these years and thousands of posts, every one know's who they are.
Old 06-30-2014 | 11:04 AM
  #161433  
finis72's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: 777 Sim Instructor
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
You and Sailing are pretty brave selling concessions and lowering expectations while hiding your names.

Soon, if not already, you two management water boys will be selling profit sharing reductions for hourly pay increases (cost neutral for management) and pay banding. Pay banding won't harm either of you, but will be a concession that costs the rest of us over 1000 jobs and 2 to 3 years of stagnation.

Don't know how you look in the mirror. You have yours, now pull up the ladder.

Jerry Fielding

PS you two will be selling us out on sick time as well. The trifecta of management's concession list.
I'm not a big proponent of pay banding but I'm curious to know where you got your figures for job loss and stagnation, me thinks it was your A$$. Maybe I'm wrong but I would think pay banding would (if done right) provide a much bigger pay raise to junior folks than senior folks.i agree there would be less training in the long run resulting in a more efficient airline. Due to massive retirements in the coming years the Delta training command is going to be 100% with or without pay banding.
People would be more interested in your posts if you would attack the message rather than the messenger.
Old 06-30-2014 | 11:15 AM
  #161434  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
After a certain amount of time on here, everyone kind of figures out who's who. I don't think Ts, or sailing, posts anything on here anymore with the expectation of being anonymous.

After all of these years and thousands of posts, every one know's who they are.
Just my opinion

It is one thing to advocate for concessions and help management. Everyone is entitled to their viewpoint.

It is quite another to accept DALPA flight pay loss and work against our cause carrying water for management without your name attached.

While I do not know who is who, I fear many of those working against a historic 2015 are here and accept union flight pay loss. They also were instrumental in selling C2012 with empty threats, empty promises and false assumptions.

We cannot fail again.

The best example was "plan B".

Not buying the 717s. The ink was dry as usual. The planes were purchased. There was no other option.

We gave up a 2 hour ALV increase, changing the summer calendar and 99 hours for reserves for nothing.

If these 2 can't get on board when management is returning $2.75 billion to the shareholders in a second round.....

Their harm to the Delta pilots is severe. They are connected and influential.

Management's top 3 are:

Pay Banding
Reducing Profit sharing
Sick leave

Sailing and Tsquare will be selling full time that concessions in these areas are wins!!

There is no reason in the world to make concessions in this environment.

The Delta pilots have made over $15 billion in life changing concessions and counting.

Our concessionary contract is no longer necessary.

We do not want to kill the golden goose. We simply want a fair agreement that recognizes our sacrifices and our contributions.
Old 06-30-2014 | 11:25 AM
  #161435  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,876
Likes: 193
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
You and Sailing are pretty brave selling concessions and lowering expectations while hiding your names.

Soon, if not already, you two management water boys will be selling profit sharing reductions for hourly pay increases (cost neutral for management) and pay banding. Pay banding won't harm either of you, but will be a concession that costs the rest of us over 1000 jobs and 2 to 3 years of stagnation.

Don't know how you look in the mirror. You have yours, now pull up the ladder.

Jerry Fielding

PS you two will be selling us out on sick time as well. The trifecta of management's concession list.
Jerry, all these concessions you claim I support have really only accomplished a few things. They have almost doubled my pay since the bankruptcy and improved my quality of life. I want ever dime I can get in my last years. I think given the circumstances DALPA has delivered like no other airline union. In fact their performance since leaving chapter 11 probably surpasses unions in any business. You made it clear many times you want to burn the house down and dance on Delta's grave. The good news is the majority of pilots don't agree with you.
Does it really bother you so badly to see the projections put out for contract 2012 turning out to be if anything understated? Relax a little and enjoy life.
Take a look at this forums other threads and ask yourself why Delta appears to be the first choice for everyone wanting a airline job. The results speak loud and clear.
Old 06-30-2014 | 11:25 AM
  #161436  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by finis72
I'm not a big proponent of pay banding but I'm curious to know where you got your figures for job loss and stagnation, me thinks it was your A$$. Maybe I'm wrong but I would think pay banding would (if done right) provide a much bigger pay raise to junior folks than senior folks.i agree there would be less training in the long run resulting in a more efficient airline. Due to massive retirements in the coming years the Delta training command is going to be 100% with or without pay banding.
People would be more interested in your posts if you would attack the message rather than the messenger.
I'm sure you are much smarter than I am.

I got the same numbers from my fellow 1985 hires at United and American. As you know, they both already have pay banding. 4 bands.

They both stated the productivity gain for management is around 15%.

Imagine 9 fleets/8 bases and over 800 retirements in 12 months.

From my years of doing ALPA work, I estimate each retirement to result in 8 to 10 initial training cycles. But let's use 6.

800 X 6 = 4800. 4800 initial training cycles in 12 months. Never mind the cost, who will fly the planes?

And in the years when over 800 pilot retire at age 65, how many will really retire? 1100? 1200?

Right now retirements are running at 2 for every 1 scheduled to retire at age 65.

Pay banding is a massive concession that will further stagnate our careers. And if you are already at the top? Who cares? It won't harm you.

Pull up the ladder.
Old 06-30-2014 | 11:36 AM
  #161437  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Jerry, all these concessions you claim I support have really only accomplished a few things. They have almost doubled my pay since the bankruptcy and improved my quality of life. I want ever dime I can get in my last years. I think given the circumstances DALPA has delivered like no other airline union. In fact their performance since leaving chapter 11 probably surpasses unions in any business. You made it clear many times you want to burn the house down and dance on Delta's grave. The good news is the majority of pilots don't agree with you.
Does it really bother you so badly to see the projections put out for contract 2012 turning out to be if anything understated? Relax a little and enjoy life.
Take a look at this forums other threads and ask yourself why Delta appears to be the first choice for everyone wanting a airline job. The results speak loud and clear.
We certainly have different opinions. I feel like management took 4 times what they needed in chapter 11. Somehow it's ok for management to make millions for themselves while they feel we must accept a permanent reset.

Don't want to burn down the house. Just restore our profession.

Management has tough work to do and I respect them.

They do not have to make split second decisions in hundred million dollar machines that hold peoples lives in the balance.

What is the cost of an accident? AF 447? $500 million? $1 billion?

That my friend is a lot of responsibility. A responsibility that no other job entails.

Let's all work together in a honest and honorable fashion to make the gains we so richly deserve.

Jerry
Old 06-30-2014 | 11:40 AM
  #161438  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Holding off on the remaining 30 76-seaters is probably not because they have second thoughts about regional jets, if that was the case why order 40?

In fact, someone was telling me just yesterday that supposedly our guys went to pick up a 717 and it was still in AirTran paint. Supposedly it had to be delivered because of a 76-seater showed up too early. I wasn't there, I don't know.
Ask during the next base visit. My understanding is Delta will order the rest if they can stabilize Mesabah/Pinnacle/Endeavor. Mesabah says the employment situation there is not stable enough to spend the money yet.
Old 06-30-2014 | 11:45 AM
  #161439  
finis72's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: 777 Sim Instructor
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
I'm sure you are much smarter than I am.

I got the same numbers from my fellow 1985 hires at United and American. As you know, they both already have pay banding. 4 bands.

They both stated the productivity gain for management is around 15%.

Imagine 9 fleets/8 bases and over 800 retirements in 12 months.

From my years of doing ALPA work, I estimate each retirement to result in 8 to 10 initial training cycles. But let's use 6.

800 X 6 = 4800. 4800 initial training cycles in 12 months. Never mind the cost, who will fly the planes?

And in the years when over 800 pilot retire at age 65, how many will really retire? 1100? 1200?

Right now retirements are running at 2 for every 1 scheduled to retire at age 65.

Pay banding is a massive concession that will further stagnate our careers. And if you are already at the top? Who cares? It won't harm you.

Pull up the ladder.
If I'm not mistaken most of the retirements will come off the top paying equipment so there will still be lots of training going on which neither you nor I can quantify. What does not a proponent of pay banding mean to you ? I will be a dot long before pay banding is even an issue. I'm soon to fall off the ladder you accuse me of pulling up.
Old 06-30-2014 | 11:54 AM
  #161440  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by finis72
If I'm not mistaken most of the retirements will come off the top paying equipment so there will still be lots of training going on which neither you nor I can quantify. What does not a proponent of pay banding mean to you ? I will be a dot long before pay banding is even an issue. I'm soon to fall off the ladder you accuse me of pulling up.
In this extremely profitable environment I am opposed to granting further concessions, especially those that cost jobs.

The day I retire, I will care just as much for the pilot on the bottom of the seniority list as I do myself.

I hope you will do the same.

Ask your reps. Going forward pay banding is a 15% productivity gain for management. That is 1800 pilots.

Haven't we given enough?

Jerry
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices