Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

tsquare 07-10-2014 04:41 PM


Originally Posted by qball (Post 1681480)
Hey T.
Apologies if you've already answered this...on what what metric do you base LGP?

DOH and left seat/right seat. Have a pulse, push throttles, get paid. Management's problem as to what airplanes they want us to fly.

Sorry finis.. but I had to answer the question... :(

tsquare 07-10-2014 04:43 PM


Originally Posted by Scoop (Post 1681475)
Being realistic probably not possible. It is looking like we will have a very rare opportunity in this business - back to back upside contracts. When is the last time that has happened? I have heard 25+ year guys say that this will be a first for them. Timing looks good for us.

However, even though we will have a net positive contract, management will have their wants and desires - it will have some concessions - after all it is a "negotiation." Now with that said, we will try to minimize what we give on (obviously) and maximize what we get.

This very topic came up yesterday at the council 16 meeting. Management always wants something. We always want something. At times one side or the other has a little more leverage.

I would love a contract where we gain in every single item but how do we do that?

Scoop - Just my 2 cents.

Yore preaching to the choir brother Scoop. I want the hard liners to tell me how they propose otherwise...

qball 07-10-2014 04:47 PM


Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1681489)
DOH and left seat/right seat. Have a pulse, push throttles, get paid. Management's problem as to what airplanes they want us to fly.

Sorry finis.. but I had to answer the question... :(


Thanks for the answer T. Now back to regular programming.

Scoop 07-10-2014 04:49 PM


Originally Posted by FL370 (Post 1681479)
One possible out is to ensure we continue to deliver our professional services without the threat of labor unrest. That is the best card we have. The company wants to remain investor grade, and we "help " by only being "fair " in our requests. Our market cap is far more important than our hourly rate.


I don't know what this means. :confused: But then again I am either a Kool-aide drinker or a Rabal-rouser depending on who you ask. :)

Scoop

Scoop 07-10-2014 04:53 PM


Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1681490)
Yore preaching to the choir brother Scoop. I want the hard liners to tell me how they propose otherwise...


We are in agreement here. We all want solid gains, but what strategy do we use?

Scoop

DAL 88 Driver 07-10-2014 04:58 PM


Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1681490)
Yore preaching to the choir brother Scoop. I want the hard liners to tell me how they propose otherwise...

Again. You're mischaracterizing the "hard liners." Almost nobody is as extreme as you're trying to make it sound.

It's really pretty simple. We took a draconian, unprecedented 42% cumulative pay cut. Plus, we lost our pension AND we had thousands of our jobs outsourced, resulting in almost a decade of some pretty bad stagnation. 10 years later, our current rates are a 34% pay cut in buying power. Talk about extreme! That's not "wallowing in self pity" or looking in the rear view mirror to the detriment of looking forward. It's just good old fashioned situational awareness.

So we're aware of the situation we're in. Where do we go from here? Do we basically give up, take restoration (or even anything close to it) off the table? Or do we set the objective to restore our profession and what's left of our careers? Do we build a plan around that objective? Or do we just fumble around with some vague mission statement about "improving" and be happy with whatever happens to fall into our laps?

Sure. Negotiations are always going to involve some give and take. But on the give and take ledger, we've done FAR more giving than taking. It's time to bring that ledger closer to being in balance. That's the perspective I have been advocating.

So there's that pesky situational awareness again... pretty basic math reminding us of exactly what it would take to balance the ledger. Are you going to advocate that DALPA adopt the objective of restoring balance to that ledger and hold them accountable for it? Or are you going to be satisfied with gains that in normal times would be considered pretty good but hardly make a dent in our situation... and forget about restoration? I think that is mostly where you and I differ.

Mesabah 07-10-2014 05:33 PM


Originally Posted by Elvis90 (Post 1681427)
If current attrition & acquisition numbers hold true, then Endeavor will be half its current size in 3 years and cease to exist in 6 years.

(1839 current pilots, 30 per month leaving, 5 per month arriving).

We'll need to increase mainline flying significantly to compensate for the loss.

We are losing 1 pilot every 16 hours. We have lost about 260 to date this year. Attrition will probably pick up to 60 per month in the fall. 9E will be gone in less than 3 years, not 6. Once the 200's are parked, and everyone is forced to NYC, it's over.

Elliot 07-10-2014 06:04 PM


We are losing 1 pilot every 16 hours. We have lost about 260 to date this year. Attrition will probably pick up to 60 per month in the fall. 9E will be gone in less than 3 years, not 6. Once the 200's are parked, and everyone is forced to NYC, it's over.
Then they need to take the (angry) FO who didn't get a job with Delta, off of the interview selection board.

I had a friend interview at Pinn-deavor last week. Not what one would consider HIGHLY qualified, but fairly well qual'd to perform FO duties at Pinn-deavor. It seemed to him the FO on the selection board was somehow bent or confused over how his mil-competency to civilian ratings worked. Almost ****ed off he was able to get it through military training while the FO had 100k plus, in student loan debts from UND to get where he was at.

No big deal. He was hired by Skywest and it's most definitely 9E's loss.

Elvis90 07-10-2014 06:33 PM


Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 1681526)
We are losing 1 pilot every 16 hours. We have lost about 260 to date this year. Attrition will probably pick up to 60 per month in the fall. 9E will be gone in less than 3 years, not 6. Once the 200's are parked, and everyone is forced to NYC, it's over.

Thanks for the correction, you've got better details.

MrMustache 07-10-2014 06:45 PM


Originally Posted by Gearjerk (Post 1681545)
Then they need to take the (angry) FO who didn't get a job with Delta, off of the interview selection board.

I had a friend interview at Pinn-deavor last week. Not what one would consider HIGHLY qualified, but fairly well qual'd to perform FO duties at Pinn-deavor. It seemed to him the FO on the selection board was somehow bent or confused over how his mil-competency to civilian ratings worked. Almost ****ed off he was able to get it through military training while the FO had 100k plus, in student loan debts from UND to get where he was at.

No big deal. He was hired by Skywest and it's most definitely 9E's loss.

Did he try Compass?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:41 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands