Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search
Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-2014, 07:18 PM
  #163211  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Because I want more money and a better quality of life.
And you get that by taking whatever management first offers, and quickly...before they change their minds.

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
His plan will yield zero for both.
That's right. Anything other than accepting whatever management tells you to accept will yield zero.

How did this industry ever make gains before the advent of you surrender first guys.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 07-18-2014, 07:22 PM
  #163212  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Permanently scarred
Posts: 1,707
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr View Post
Will you acknowledge that we already have restored and even improved upon many, many work rules? In fact our work rules now are far better than they were in C2K. (Unless that is you liked the era where reserves could fly a 2-day trip that paid as little as 4 hours for a trip that paid a regular pilot 10.30, and you liked it that the company and not the pilot, scheduled your CQ sims, and where every vacation started on Sunday, because by golly that's how we always did it. I could go on but you get the idea).
If you want to be intellectually honest you'll also mention everything that was given up by the pilot group before bankruptcy and during bankruptcy, as well as the work rules that were sacrificed and will never be regained. If you want to present a honest and complete picture that is. Or just mention a rule that was good that is now gone for each positive one you mention. Just listing one-sided points is disingenuous for the argument you're making.
GunshipGuy is offline  
Old 07-18-2014, 07:32 PM
  #163213  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
When you look at the 2013 pilot cost numbers they don't help us a bit.
You don't know what those numbers are sailingfud. You keep using the numbers labeled "pilot wages and salaries" and you call them "pilot costs." Two very different things, yet you continue to purposely conflate the two.

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Not one other airline has stepped up since 2002 and done anything.
The truth is that we've done damn little ourselves. Our pay rates that you focus on so intently were mostly fully funded by concessions and leading the industry in allowing our jobs to be outsourced.

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Asking for a minimum of 20% up front would end talks at that point. Management will simply ride the process. It will be a long and bumpy ride for us and we won't be allowed off the wagon until the NMB views us as being reasonable.
Pure nonsense and hyperbole. Just another example of you desperately trying to convince your fellow pilots that they've already lost the battle so it's best to just accept our fates. I'd love to know how you're being remunerated for this "work" of yours.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 07-18-2014, 07:38 PM
  #163214  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by GunshipGuy View Post
Interesting. But she's supposed to be a trained TV newswoman, you aren't. Maybe she isn't ditzy, just bad at doing her job. It was damn funny, though, how she screwed up by continuing the conversation to gain more clarity on the fart he witnessed. She was going to get to the bottom of that fake news story...very determined lady!
Ha ha. We are talking about MSNBC & on the other end of the spectrum, FOX News. There are very few trained newspeople at either network. Each one is part of the machine for their respective "side."

I'm pretty sure Krystal Ball ran for Congress as a Democrat a while back. She's an accountant had some pretty conservative positions on some of the issues.

Both networks employ political pundits disguised as news anchors. It's the American way of life nowadays. Don't take it personal.

I might not be a trained newsperson, but I am trained not to jump the gun and, if appropriate, before jumping to a conclusion, to always ask the next question.

Sure, sometimes when you do that, it looks like you are a ditz. But, most of the time, it will turn out you were right to do so.
newKnow is offline  
Old 07-18-2014, 07:40 PM
  #163215  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by tomgoodman View Post
Both sides in a negotiation have constituents to satisfy, so they are almost forced to open with extreme positions and perform a choreographed dance toward an agreement. Attempting to be "reasonable" by opening with something closer to the middle ground simply changes the location of the middle ground.
Absolutely 100% correct.

But this new ALPA has a new vision. It's a vision based on considering management to be valued partners and negotiate based on what's best for the partnership. It is only through this new vision where the company's success will undoubtedly trickle down to pilot group in a sustained manner instead of the boom-bust cycle. That's our new reality.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 07-18-2014, 07:46 PM
  #163216  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
I suspect with stock options there raises are a order of magnitude higher then your stating. However it's irrelevant to our pay.
That correct. Which makes me wonder why you and the other surrender early folks so often make the argument that we can't get this or that because then management would have to give it to the other non-union employees? Seems a tad inconsistent.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 07-18-2014, 07:57 PM
  #163217  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,728
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Absolutely 100% correct.

But this new ALPA has a new vision. It's a vision based on considering management to be valued partners and negotiate based on what's best for the partnership. It is only through this new vision where the company's success will undoubtedly trickle down to pilot group in a sustained manner instead of the boom-bust cycle. That's our new reality.

Carl
And that would be fine with me, but only IF...

We got paid like management; in addition to our base pay, we too got stock options, performance bonuses (at more than $25!) a fully funded retirement plan...oh, and a zero cost, zero deductible medical plan, for life, oh, and PS passes...for life.

I just hope Ed is -finally- able to sleep at night. Why is that tool still working here?

For the NW guys, he's the only DL South mgt douche to keep his job, after testifying to the BK judge that he couldn't sleep at night, worrying that Delta wouldn't survive unless he ass-raped us.

Last edited by Timbo; 07-18-2014 at 08:07 PM.
Timbo is offline  
Old 07-18-2014, 08:01 PM
  #163218  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by NERD View Post
My question is this. How do we get rid of the long term bureaucrats? (Btw we had a lot of powerful behind the scenes guys at Nwalpa too) Each LEC has a election every (3?) years, so there is a way for the line pilot to affect turnover. How do we, the line pilots help in the cleansing/turnover of the committee positions?
The best way to do that is to understand the enormous power these self-interested lifers have in a top-down organization like DALPA. When we understand that, we can let our reps know that we're watching not only the way they vote, but the actions of these lifers and will strongly support rep action to remove the lifers ANYTIME they begin to misbehave. It's the one and only way we have to force bottom-up rule in an organization that is so stubbornly top-down.

Originally Posted by NERD View Post
It may be time for alpha, buzz and the gang to take a break and go fly. Whether any of us agree with their positions, we all should thank them for their time and wish them good luck.
Most of them did lose their positions after the terrible breach of trust that happened with C2012 and the utter incompetence shown by the 117 negotiations. More and more, our reps are behaving as activists. A very good thing.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 07-18-2014, 08:05 PM
  #163219  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by Mem9guy View Post
Time out, lets compare apples to apples. We are just comparing hourly book rates. It is complete BS to start throwing some Profit Sharing in to our book rates to make them look inflated.

Profit sharing may be part of our compensation, but it is not part of our hourly rates, and is not guaranteed to be anything.
Fair enough, the diff will only be around $11.50 by excluding it as I clearly posted.

The +PS was separately shown after the straight calculation, just to show a more complete "big picture view" of what is working for a pilot in Section 3. I find it less than accurate to not factor in the primary ways of accruing income in the PWA, especially when it is a direct add-on in percentage points to the pay hours received for a year of employment.

It would have been better "forum decorum" to post that separately I suppose. The intent was to dispel the "$40/hr more" fallacy. I hope that part was demonstrated clearly.
shiznit is offline  
Old 07-18-2014, 08:12 PM
  #163220  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo View Post
Actually, I never called anyone too stupid or lazy or weak.
Actually, I've had numerous reps tell me that's exactly how you referred to them when they didn't instantly accept your opinions as fact. One said you have a unique way of making people feel inconsequential and invisible. I've seen you behave this exact same way here.

Originally Posted by alfaromeo View Post
My point was that we had a full pilot vote. The only way you can call that non-democratic is if you believe that the pilots are too stupid or lazy or weak to make a rational decision.
Yet another classic straw man. Nobody has called it "non-democratic" except you. Nobody. Now you accuse Fly4hire of insinuating pilots to be lazy, stupid and weak for a premise that only you are espousing. Everyone sees this Alfa. You're not fooling anyone.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices