![]() |
|
Originally Posted by FlyingDutchman
(Post 1705394)
T you're absolutely right it should, but somehow it hasn't happened and I'm not holding breath it ever will . Last time I checked AF was flying 5 of the 6 flights out of JFK and all with BIG stuff.
Originally Posted by FlyingDutchman
(Post 1705394)
The JV agreement is a joke and it's costing us (DL pilots) big time.:mad:
|
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1705438)
Don't fool yourself. We don't have protections.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1705440)
Yes, you do have a miss understanding. In the old contract you could be put on short call with 10 hours notice. The new contract requires 12 hours notice so the 2 hours is built in.
New: AA. Amend Section 23. S. 5. c. and d. and add Exception (new) to read: 16 17 c. Reserved. 18 d. can be converted to short call no earlier than 12 hours from the first attempted 19 contact by Crew Scheduling and will be released from duty during the 12 hours 20 immediately preceding the start of his short call period. Old: be converted to short call no earlier than ten hours from the first attempted 14 contact by Crew Scheduling and will be released from duty during the ten hours 15 immediately preceding the start of his short call period. |
Originally Posted by cni187
(Post 1705290)
I bet we see all the shuttles move to the 717. The west coast 175's from LA-SF-LA and SEA-SF-SEA are always late and/or canceling. I bet we still see the 717s on the left coast if the regionals can't find people. Mainline needs the feed to Sea and LA for the Intl stuff.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1705354)
The real sickening thing is that I'll wager a steak dinner that it gets sold to SWA.... I'd rather they tear it down than sell it to them...
|
Originally Posted by duder
(Post 1705571)
I heard gate agents and rampers say this exact thing over a year ago in LGA. SWA is lobbying hard in NYC to take full control of the MAT. Only a matter of time before they do. :mad:
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1705522)
Supposedly, we are flying to CDG from SLC and DTW and other places where we are flying that they are NOT because they are flying big stuff out of JFK. I don't know the intricacies of the JV deal, but I am going with the premise that we are (will be) our of compliance. So what do we do about it? I think the opportunity here is for dALPA to say that DAL cannot put any code on these newly announced flights until compliance is assured, or better yet, renegotiated.
The Company is currently at 47 percent (46.8 percent on an internal audit) of the EASKs and needs to be at 48.5 percent on a three-year rolling average to achieve compliance. The latest OAG data pull shows that Delta will be at 47 percent at the end of the cure period. For perspective, to return to compliance Delta would have to fly: 15.1 daily DTW-AMS 330-300 flights. or 20.5 daily JFK-LHR 767-400 flights. The numbers get larger because it’s a three-year average and there are fewer months left to raise the average. It needs to be noted that our flying has not decreased, (on an EASK basis) and actually has increased about 3 percent year-over-year. However, the pull-down from the economic downturn (2011-2012) has caused the company to be out of compliance on a three-year average basis. If the measurement period were a one-year period they would be in compliance. The bottom line is that the company will likely not be in compliance and will violate the PWA next year. The MEC has not yet decided upon the actions we will take regarding this PWA violation. |
Originally Posted by duder
(Post 1705571)
I heard gate agents and rampers say this exact thing over a year ago in LGA. SWA is lobbying hard in NYC to take full control of the MAT. Only a matter of time before they do. :mad:
|
Originally Posted by duder
(Post 1705570)
Not going to happen anytime soon without major schedule changes. Like the other guy said "we" can barely run it with a 175. Good luck trying to unload 110 PAX on a 30 min turn and load the next 110 in that window. Only way its possible is to reduce frequency to absorb delays which isn't going to happen. Delta sends those flights out hours late if they have to. All these late arrivals and departures have to do with gate availaiblity and ATC flow control. 717s aren't going to solve this problem as much as I'd love to see this flying return to mainline where it belongs.
I don't think the goal is to have a full plane on the shuttle so anything less than full and 30 min is doable. Especially if we are not dealing with the aisle chairs and WCs that are on a typical flight but even then we turn full loads both ways in 35 minutes. We recorded it one day for fun. 10 minutes to unload 110, 10 to clean and cater it, 10 to load 110 back on and 5 to spare. It's a small jet. |
Originally Posted by CheapTrick
(Post 1705471)
717 LGA shuttle flying has been on the 717 future city list for 6 months. The plan was for DTW to fly the majority of the trips just like the DTW 320 base did previously. This announcement doesn't seem to preclude a West Coast at all. I don't think anyone knows until marketing decides. My money would be on NYC though.
I'd gladly do the shuttle flying, seems fun. It's about as long as I can stand to sit in a jet these days. I do a lot of EWR and HOU and it hurts my butt. I love 30-40 minute flights. Nirvana would be 30-40 minute flights to a place that has D-ATIS and PDCs and no wheels up times. I bet anything out west or east will be handled by DTW and ATL until they finally make a decision. We've got a lot of LGA-Florida flying on the 717 in September. That's new. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:42 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands