![]() |
|
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1707175)
If ALPA is bottom up as you contend, why is Heidi the only presidential candidate to write to the line pilots?
Can any rep vote for Canoll or Heppner in good conscious with zero of the pilots they represent knowing they are running? Too much time on Denny's balcony, I guess. :o |
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1707278)
May one ask why TC has yet to release the evidence of hacking requested by the judge in his lawsuit?
Meanwhile, our scope still isn't being complied with. I give nearly zero ducks what happened to the DPA stupid web site. I care that we're not staffing 15 transatlantic flights per day on widebody equipment. I support those working to improve our contract. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1707238)
We can not enjoy the unity of brothers who do not wish to be ALPA members. When they step over the line of seeking to harm ALPA and harm other ALPA members, then we have a duty to protect our association and members. It is not about retribution, not at all. We always seek the restoration of members, but, it is ridiculous to have a member who is actively seeking the decertification of the association and trying to create liabilities for which the association and it's membership will be asked to pay.
Those who have left and those who have been expelled have generally wanted back in and been much better members afterwards. I have yet to vote on a membership resolution, except to welcome members back into our union. That member then went on to be a very productive volunteer who helped a lot of other pilots. When the company does not pursue termination, I'll look for the letter from ALPA urging us to rejoin ALPA for the sake of unity. Maybe they can get you to write the letter. Look forward to your resolution Bar. Carl |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1707297)
Meanwhile, our scope still isn't being complied with.
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1707297)
I care that we're not staffing 15 transatlantic flights per day on widebody equipment.
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1707297)
I support those working to improve our contract.
Carl |
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1707282)
Agreed. Keep in mind that the document we've been discussing is the Contract History, which showed the history (duh) of our two airline pilot contracts over the past 20 years or so. I recently received the Contract Comparison (I assume we all did) that provides the comparison with our peers. |
Cheese and Rice! :mad:
When's the damn vote? Let's get this behind us already! |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1707297)
I support those working to improve our contract.
Most of their focus appears to be directed toward holding onto power and maintaining their "engagement" with management. As far as representing line pilots, ALPA is thoroughly dysfunctional. |
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
(Post 1707304)
When's the damn vote? Let's get this behind us already!
We're all focused on C2015 with ALPA being our bargaining agent. I have to throw my full support behind an organization whose president has clearly stated we will not be a problem for management and reps who have thus far said nothing to counter it. That's our reality. Carl |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1707297)
I give nearly zero ducks what happened to the DPA stupid web site. I care that we're not staffing 15 transatlantic flights per day on widebody equipment. I support those working to improve our contract.
|
Carl,
Please re-read my post and be honest. I wrote, "when they step over the line of seeking to harm ALPA and harm other ALPA members, then we have a duty to protect our association and members." The average frustrated ALPA member who sends in a card to "send a message" might be more emotional than rational, but they are far from intending harm. There is a clear distinction between such a malcontent and someone who files a lawsuit against other Delta pilot(s), or who leads a decertification effort during contract negotiations. The way our union is structured and the legal environment it exists in make it very difficult for the union to avoid being exposed when a member purposely throws himself or another member under the bus with the intent of triggering a DFR claim. It is against ALPA's very inclusive nature to expel a member, but if the member is trying to kill the union and all attempts at reconciliation fail, then what would you suggest? If the DPA has no hope of a vote, then they need to try to channel their efforts in some positive direction ... or cease existence. Using donations to sue Delta pilots is, IMHO an abuse of the money and support they have been given. The DPA leader has spoken to the web site guy several times and should be able to easily figure out who owned the other domain. How does the DPA not know who was involved? ... and if so, why are they stringing their members along? If you were honest with yourself and your readers, you would recall that I am always asking DPA members to get involved in the process, participate and bring forward their political agenda. We need energetic people who seek improvement in our working conditions. ALPA always needs volunteers and people to serve. If the DPA doesn't like Capt. (insert imagined villain of the day) then your chances are much better of voting him out of office than making up false allegations and pursuing legal claims which have no basis in fact. I'm not excluding the average DPA member, but rather explaining how to actually be effective. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:36 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands