Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Knowing less than nothing about the way that our revenue management folks work, I'll caveat all this by saying that it's an assumption on my part.
I have to assume that these folks already do everything they can to increase profits to the maximum possible by picking up every penny and dollar of revenue that's out there and by cutting every nickel and dime of costs they can squeeze out. Your statement above suggests that perhaps they're holding back a bit because our current level of compensation lets them make today's profits with only today's effort.
Again, not knowing anything about what they do, I still have to assume that they're not just lying in wait for us to get a pay raise before they go after that additional $3.
I have to assume that these folks already do everything they can to increase profits to the maximum possible by picking up every penny and dollar of revenue that's out there and by cutting every nickel and dime of costs they can squeeze out. Your statement above suggests that perhaps they're holding back a bit because our current level of compensation lets them make today's profits with only today's effort.
Again, not knowing anything about what they do, I still have to assume that they're not just lying in wait for us to get a pay raise before they go after that additional $3.
They can restore our pay plus inflation.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Alfa,
Interesting statement from you, however, you did not answer the question.
The original question was (I changed "Mr Missive Writings" to "John Doe" and bolded it to avoid confusion):
"Are you saying that Mr. John Doe does not now hold, or hold at the time of the "hacking," any ALPA office, whether appointed or elected? Or that John Doe was not an "ALPA Volunteer" in any capacity at the time his "thoughts of a personal nature" were "intermingling" with DPA's website?"
Your original 5 paragraph answer, using precise legal wording now has me wondering.
It's a simple question. How about a simple "yes he was" or "no he was not" answer.
Inquiring minds want to know.
Interesting statement from you, however, you did not answer the question.
The original question was (I changed "Mr Missive Writings" to "John Doe" and bolded it to avoid confusion):
"Are you saying that Mr. John Doe does not now hold, or hold at the time of the "hacking," any ALPA office, whether appointed or elected? Or that John Doe was not an "ALPA Volunteer" in any capacity at the time his "thoughts of a personal nature" were "intermingling" with DPA's website?"
Your original 5 paragraph answer, using precise legal wording now has me wondering.
It's a simple question. How about a simple "yes he was" or "no he was not" answer.
Inquiring minds want to know.
But, of course you are setting up a false dilemma. What you are arguing is that if this guy ever had even a shred of connection with ALPA, then ALPA is responsible for this hacking.
Tomorrow I will be driving to work. Let's say I am speeding on the highway and crash into a station wagon full of nuns and give them all whiplash. I am going to work at Delta, wearing my Delta uniform, in a car paid for by money made from Delta Air Lines.
Now, does Delta Air Lines, or Richard Anderson, or my Chief Pilot have anything to do with this accident? Please answer that yes or no.
Once again, I deny there was any hacking involved whatsoever, I saw the dump from the DNS entries and DPA or someone else screwed them up. It's not a big deal, but they should just own up to it and let the matter go. But in order to answer your question, we have to assume some hacking actually took place; so once again let's ride the crazy train.
It is immaterial if this guy had some connection to ALPA at some point in his life. Just because he ever did ALPA work does not mean ALPA sanctioned or would ever sanction this type of behavior. Since you have no case and there is no "scandal" you are trying to invent one out of thin air. The argument is that if this guy was ever connected with ALPA then ALPA is responsible.
This is a silly argument and one which normal people will see through in an instant. I can see how the DPA faithful will be rallied to chuck out some more money to their attorney, but everyone that thinks can understand that doing ALPA work does not make you an agent of ALPA for every private action you take. ALPA has a leadership structure and if ALPA ordered this action (which didn't take place) then ALPA is responsible. If this guy had some connection to ALPA and took action on his own free time then ALPA has no responsibility.
Once again, lacking ESP, I have no idea who this person is and I don't ever want to know. I simply don't understand how you can't grasp the fact that I don't know who this is so therefore I can't answer any questions about him. Is that plain enough for you? Yes or No.
That's a 3 year period out of a total of 10 years. Everything we have accomplished since taking a 32.5% pay cut to prevent bankruptcy and then a 14% pay cut during bankruptcy leaves us at a 34% pay cut in buying power today. All we've recovered is most (not all) of the 14% pay cut we took during bankruptcy with an 1113 gun to our head. The financial crisis that was so dire it compelled over 50% of us to agree to a draconian, unprecedented 32.5% pay cut is long over. Our industry has been restructured in a way that should smooth out to some degree the up and down cycles and facilitate more consistent profits. Our company is making literally multiple billions in profits with an outlook for even better. And our current buying power is BELOW the buying power we had after taking the 32.5% pay cut in an extreme emergency situation.
The point is that these "men and women who have devoted countless hours, days, and years of their lives coming up with strategies to score as many point for us as possible" have predetermined that the number of "points" needed for restoration is not possible. That may be acceptable to you but it's not to me and it's not to thousands of other Delta pilots. I appreciate their hard work and sacrifice. I don't appreciate their defeatist attitude and lack of proper respect for the value of our profession.
We can agree to disagree with their conclusions, but I am firmly convinced that your view of their disposition is flat out wrong.
You're sure about that? I've played around with the numbers on that quite a bit. Even did a little exercise at the end of last year where I estimated the number of passengers I carried for the year and divided by my total compensation. My cost last year was $2.98 per passenger.
So let's assume the total cost per passenger for the average Delta cockpit is $6. The 50% pay increase we'd need right now for full restoration would be an additional $3 per passenger. Delta had no trouble inventing $25 bag fees out of thin air and collecting them. You're telling me they can't figure out a way to net an additional $3 per passenger (whether through revenue increases, cost cuts in other areas, or some combination) and be able to cover the cost of fully restoring our pay? If they could net the additional $3, full restoration of our pay would have ZERO effect on profits.
So let's assume the total cost per passenger for the average Delta cockpit is $6. The 50% pay increase we'd need right now for full restoration would be an additional $3 per passenger. Delta had no trouble inventing $25 bag fees out of thin air and collecting them. You're telling me they can't figure out a way to net an additional $3 per passenger (whether through revenue increases, cost cuts in other areas, or some combination) and be able to cover the cost of fully restoring our pay? If they could net the additional $3, full restoration of our pay would have ZERO effect on profits.
Whatever.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
USAPA has NOT abrogated an arbitration. They have delayed it. I know the webbboard lawyers are celebrating their temporary delays as some victory, but they are coming to a close. USAPA will soon not represent anyone in anything. They signed away their right to represent in the MOU and soon APA will represent the entire pilot group.
The APA has stated openly that they will not take on the DFR liabilities of USAPA. That means that there will be three separate merger committees, East, West, and APA. Actually, AMR management is also a party to the proceedings and they have openly stated that they will not take on the DFR liabilities of USAPA. The Allegheny/Mohawk LPP's dictate that all disputes amongst the parties will be solved by final and binding arbitration.
Therefore, my guess is the first dispute is what list will be integrated in with the American list. That dispute will be solved by an arbitrator (or panel of arbitrators) and they will decide whether or not the previous arbitration has been abrogated by USAPA's delays. My guess is that the East pilots will not be happy with that arbitration.
All complicated cases like this go their own way so there may be some other solution. In the end, the West pilots have their rights. As one of the federal judges said, a neutral arbitration is powerful evidence of a fair result. Therefore, whatever happens to the West pilots will be judged on the basis of what their rights were under the Nicolau award. If the Nicolau award is not used, then the West pilots will have to have seniority as good or better than the Nicolau award or someone will have to pay them money.
As I said before, neither the APA nor AMR management want to be writing those checks, so USAPA has merely delayed the arbitration, they have abrogated nothing. USAPA can't negotiate away the West's pilots rights no matter how much internet blather they spew. Delay is not victory. Instead, they just flushed away billions of dollars they will never get back. WINNING!!!!!!!!!
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
So, it's better to lose half and then get nothing back? That's the part you and your ilk leave out. While we were getting 60% back the rest of the world was getting 0; and we are the idiots? Got it.
The point is that a strong management team can always find a way to offset additional costs when incentivized to do so. Our union will absolutely not push management or incent them. Zero chance. Our management is fully capable...our union is not. They're owned by management.
Carl
Management needs to cover dramatically increased fuel costs, they invent $25 bag fees. Management needs to cover dramatically increased pilot costs... well... They don't need to do that because they have DALPA running interference for them.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post