Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2014 | 04:59 AM
  #167111  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by maddogmax
I took the last ER plan at age 62 and never looked back. I would have taken it at 60 if it had been offered. As has been discussed before, health insurance costs are a big issue before you are eligible for Medicare. I was able to go on my wife's insurance which made my choice easier. As an aside, I would have had to medically retire when I was 63.

I know you did max. You were the exception, not the rule.
Old 08-29-2014 | 05:00 AM
  #167112  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
So you're saying that they are offering it to select pilots on select 4 engine airplanes? Hell no. Sorry. That's wrong. Displace 'em, and train 'em.
MD88's usually have an inoperative APU and a huffer to get started. Does that make it a four engine airplane?

I read no stipulation that all four have to be in use at the same time.
Old 08-29-2014 | 05:06 AM
  #167113  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
You asked the question. Sorry you find fault with the answer.

I don't understand. Some of you people have been complaining about Moak for a long time. If I knew how to do it I would go back and quote some posts about how he should be impeached for A,B and C. Yet it was all apparently internet bloviating. Or was it? Now since someone says all these things are true, it makes me wonder why those proceedings were never initiated. Instead, it was more "effective" to go out and attempt to burn down the house, instead of removing the rats. Caplinger's motives are becoming a lot more clearer with this.....
Old 08-29-2014 | 05:14 AM
  #167114  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
MD88's usually have an inoperative APU and a huffer to get started. Does that make it a four engine airplane?

I read no stipulation that all four have to be in use at the same time.
I dunno. What's your point? Mine is that there will be no mass exodus of anybody. So if you selectively offer it to certain groups that have retirements and on top of that we have to pay for it... yeah, I'll be pizzed if we pay ANYTHING for this "privelege".

Scenario: The company says we want to get rid of the whales, but they do not make up the most senior guys on the list. We don't want to train them. How do we incentivize those guys to leave? Early retirement plan. OK. But they are not by and large more senior than the 777 guys. So if we offer it to the most senior guys on the list, the 777 guys might leave generating more training. We don't want that. So we'll buy you a few more 330s. How's that? You mean the ones that you really need, and that you are gonna announce in a couple of months anyway? For that, you get to offer retirement to a select bunch of guys? Why are we even having this discussion? If I were a 63 year old 777 pilot, I would be livid.

No. Bigger pays more, this is another side benefit.
Old 08-29-2014 | 05:16 AM
  #167115  
Oberon's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
From: 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
So you're saying that they are offering it to select pilots on select 4 engine airplanes? Hell no. Sorry. That's wrong. Displace 'em, and train 'em.
Why is displacing better than early retirements? Serious question.
Old 08-29-2014 | 05:19 AM
  #167116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp

Additionally, I have yet to see UA parking whales. You know that thing where I say you're awful at data analysis? Yep... That again.
Your youth and inexperience is showing again...

UAL used to operate 44 747-400. They're down to 23 now. One other point, their network is different than ours, with a hub structure that should be able to support larger jets. Even in this airline economy they've been unsuccessful at doing that, and in June they had a complete revenue and finance management makeover. Also, their widebody order book is, in general, for smaller aircraft than they're currently operating (787 and A350).

UAL has lagged Delta 1-4 years in making decisions and accomplishing goals. Look for their fleet changes to accelerate in 2015 (they've just started the regional restructuring Delta began in 2012). If/when they ever get their act together they will be a phenomenal competitor.

United Continental Holdings, Inc. - Investor Relations - Fleet Information

UAL 2003 (page 11)
Old 08-29-2014 | 05:22 AM
  #167117  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Oberon
Why is displacing better than early retirements? Serious question.
If we pay ANYTHING to allow this, it is wrong. And we always do. Always have. And the benefits are minimal at best. No mass exodus, and it doesn't happen for months or years.

Re-run reel 'A' Mr Projectionist.
Old 08-29-2014 | 05:24 AM
  #167118  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Because my reps don't think there's enough time to impeach Moak before he is gone anyway.
Yep. That was one of the excuses from my reps as well. Of course, they also defended what he said.
Old 08-29-2014 | 05:28 AM
  #167119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
From: Permanently scarred
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
These "early out" programs are nothing but crap to appease the troops. There will be no significant number of pilots that leave because of any program. The ones that do will only be leaving a month or two early anyway. Been there, seen this, got several expensive T shirts to prove it. We'll pay a lot for a Yugo. There should be no negotiations on this. If it is a good deal, the company would just offer it. What is there to negotiate? They want to mitigate a flush of training supposedly, right? What is there for us to do that could help in this arena? No... we are gonna pay something, and whatever it is, it's too much.
^^^^^^^SHACK!!!!^^^^^^
Why don't our reps get this? Seems the NC is just jonesing and needs a fix. Just say NO! and step away.
Old 08-29-2014 | 05:30 AM
  #167120  
Flamer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 3
From: Lowest Pay I Could Find
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
So you're saying that they are offering it to select pilots on select 4 engine airplanes? Hell no. Sorry. That's wrong. Displace 'em, and train 'em.
Agreed. Something makes me think this will be dirty. Very dirty.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices