![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Herkflyr
(Post 1739721)
But would you fly it if it were a 0.5 hour flight from ATL-AGS, 6 hours behind a hotel door--never ever reducible--and the 0.5 hour flight back? Apparently that is how NWA did it for a long time and guys liked it.
That is BEST case scenorio. Not always out of sunny ATL. They will also be done out of NYC, DTW and MSP. Then you add in de-icing in winter, summer storms other wx delays, MX issues and doing multiple in a row. This is more the norm than the perfect scenario. Then guys call in sick for a string of them then there you go.... they end of being done by reserves who never wanted them. HELL NO! I was forced to do them for years.....worse thing on planet earth for flying IMO. I like a gentlemen sched. If I wanted a freight sched. I would have applied to Fedex or UPS |
If stand up overnights are in the new contract it will be a no vote for me.
|
Originally Posted by yodafly
(Post 1739875)
If stand up overnights are in the new contract it will be a no vote for me.
1 - I will find some way to get out of the trip and some other poor sucker will have to fly it. 2 - If I end up getting stuck with the trip, I will be calling in fatigued for the morning flight. I will not sign a release certifying I'm fit to conduct a flight when I'm fatigued. That is illegal and irresponsible. (How do you guys think CDO's came to be known as "illegals" in the first place? :eek:) |
Originally Posted by Imapilot2
(Post 1739855)
That is BEST case scenorio. Not always out of sunny ATL. They will also be done out of NYC, DTW and MSP. Then you add in de-icing in winter, summer storms other wx delays, MX issues and doing multiple in a row. This is more the norm than the perfect scenario. Then guys call in sick for a string of them then there you go.... they end of being done by reserves who never wanted them. HELL NO! I was forced to do them for years.....worse thing on planet earth for flying IMO. I like a gentlemen sched. If I wanted a freight sched. I would have applied to Fedex or UPS
|
Originally Posted by Fly4hire
(Post 1739824)
That's not what the NC brought back on the 117 LOA, and why it was taken out. The company wants it as a way to mitigate widespread 30hr layovers. Me thinks if it was limited to < 1hr flights it wouldn't be a big deal, but that's not what the company wants.
|
|
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1739726)
Not no but HELL NO!
How about we make them "Un-assignable" as in, you must BID IT to fly it. No reserve should be stuck with it, and no line holder should be Un-stacked into one. When they cave, it should on be with Timbo's conditions. If someone calls in sick for it, it has to go straight to green slip. It must be voluntary under all conditions of coverage. |
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1739882)
You guys are like a bunch of old women on the CDO thing. I realize it's part of a anti ALPA rhetoric to keep bringing them up but here is the simple truth. The company can take them or leave them. They are not pushing for them. CDO's originated with the pilot group. If the contract survey shows they are not wanted that will be the end of the story. Find something new to whine about. If you're concerned about them then get your survey filled out.
|
Originally Posted by orvil
(Post 1739893)
I said Hell No in the survey. DALPA will cave on it, of course.
When they cave, it should on be with Timbo's conditions. If someone calls in sick for it, it has to go straight to green slip. It must be voluntary under all conditions of coverage. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:28 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands