Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Doug Masters 10-04-2014 10:11 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1740051)
They have been promising great things from trainer since it was purchased. Virtually every quarter after reporting the loses they state next quarter will be better. They reported a 43 million dollar loss in the second quarter.


Is that the management equivalent of "We'll get em next time"?;)

FIIGMO 10-04-2014 10:21 AM


Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 (Post 1739837)
Guys, please watch for straggling non-revs on last flights of the night. We were late to our flight to an outstation last night due to missing a wide open flight to ATL (over 50 seats open) filling up with hk's 10 min prior to departure (next flight was a little late so they moved everyone up). Our flight to the outstation had a mx plane swap so we thought we had a chance (we did), but we didn't get on. We arrived at the gate to find the agent in the jetway and the plane still fueling. I waved in the window to no avail while watching this aircraft fuel for 15 minutes. Plane ended up pushing 27 minutes after we arrived at the gate. I know our company doesn't care about non-revs, but I was disappointed in our employees. I know i was seen by a ground personnel because he waved, then walked up the jetway. I would never expect anyone to delay a flight for a non-rev, but I do expect our agents to put people on when it will not delay the flight at all. Anyhow, spent the night in a hotel with my family for 7 hours to get up and fly to a different airport 100 miles away from where we need to be. Please just be aware at the end of the night. Non-revving is hard enough as is. We don't need our own employees holding us back. It became obvious to me that we definitely do not have the "Southwest culture."

44,

Just left a European city this am, acs had a payload opt flight that was BS and we (crew) were not aware of any weight issues. ACS wanted the plane closed, CA refused the leave the gate and after 20 mins of a standoff that was very professional but firm, we got 5 very relieved and happy non revs on the flight and even did a reduced TO from a shorter runway.

Ended well and we took care of each other! All crews should ask questions early enough to stop this stuff. Benefits? Only if we take the time to be sure it all passes the smell test!

FIIG

iceman49 10-04-2014 10:49 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1739882)
You guys are like a bunch of old women on the CDO thing. I realize it's part of a anti ALPA rhetoric to keep bringing them up but here is the simple truth. The company can take them or leave them. They are not pushing for them. CDO's originated with the pilot group. If the contract survey shows they are not wanted that will be the end of the story. Find something new to whine about. If you're concerned about them then get your survey filled out.

Sailing, do you have numbers or a percentage of the pilot group that is asking for the CDOs. Thx

sailingfun 10-04-2014 10:53 AM


Originally Posted by iceman49 (Post 1740082)
Sailing, do you have numbers or a percentage of the pilot group that is asking for the CDOs. Thx

That's what the survey is for.

Denny Crane 10-04-2014 11:05 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1740051)
They have been promising great things from trainer since it was purchased. Virtually every quarter after reporting the loses they state next quarter will be better. They reported a 43 million dollar loss in the second quarter. We have between a 14 c per gallon to 6 cents per gallon advantage on fuel costs in the last reports depending on which airline. What I read stated it was due to hedges not trainer. Regardless trainer has a long way to go to eat up the startup costs.

Edit, the 43 million loss was first quarter, they reported a profit so 13 million second quarter. Here is Anderson's recent statement on fuel cost at Delta. Note the term market in his quote.

"The refinery has made an impact on market fuel prices and we have a solid hedge book in place that should reduce our fuel expense by more than $350mn for the year, including $100mn in the September quarter," chief executive Richard Anderson said during a conference call with analysts.

Sailingfun,

I have a couple questions maybe you can answer. Does Monroe Energy (a subsidiary of Delta) charge Delta Air Lines the "crack spread" to refine a barrel of oil in to aviation fuel? Because Delta owns Monroe, does Delta pay a federal sales tax on the fuel it gets from Monroe? (I've heard no because it's all in one company and you don't have to charge yourself sales tax.)

I'd like to know how these two numbers are accounted for in the overall Delta Air Lines balance sheet before I'd consider Trainer to be a money loser.

Denny

flyguy1 10-04-2014 11:17 AM


Originally Posted by iceman49 (Post 1740082)
Sailing, do you have numbers or a percentage of the pilot group that is asking for the CDOs. Thx

According to DPA's survey, 40% support CDOs.

buzzpat 10-04-2014 11:26 AM


Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1739906)
This sounds like a five year old that is going to hold his breath. Sorry, but http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV...,67,98_AL_.jpg

sailing is right.... I don't want the damned things either, but getting this spun up is ridiculous.

Says another guy who won't be flying them....

Love ya T!

RockyBoy 10-04-2014 12:05 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1739882)
You guys are like a bunch of old women on the CDO thing. I realize it's part of a anti ALPA rhetoric to keep bringing them up but here is the simple truth. The company can take them or leave them. They are not pushing for them. CDO's originated with the pilot group. If the contract survey shows they are not wanted that will be the end of the story. Find something new to whine about. If you're concerned about them then get your survey filled out.

So let me get this straight. During the 117 negotiation we came to an agreement for 5:15 per day. ALPA decided that was too good so to "offset" the cost to the company ALPA decides to introduce them into the deal. The company never wanted them and wasn't the party that introduced them?

So far I've heard of NOBODY that wants them so to say they originated with the pilot group is hard for me to believe. Now that we've been talking about them I know there are a few guys that wouldn't mind them, but before the 117 thing I'll bet there were less than a dozen guys out of 12,000 that asked the reps to bring us CDO's.

After C2012 I have no faith that what we put in the survey will actually steer the NC. If 95% of us say no in the survey they will still show up in a TA.

RetiredFTS 10-04-2014 12:17 PM


Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 (Post 1739837)
Guys, please watch for straggling non-revs on last flights of the night. We were late to our flight to an outstation last night due to missing a wide open flight to ATL (over 50 seats open) filling up with hk's 10 min prior to departure (next flight was a little late so they moved everyone up). Our flight to the outstation had a mx plane swap so we thought we had a chance (we did), but we didn't get on. We arrived at the gate to find the agent in the jetway and the plane still fueling. I waved in the window to no avail while watching this aircraft fuel for 15 minutes. Plane ended up pushing 27 minutes after we arrived at the gate. I know our company doesn't care about non-revs, but I was disappointed in our employees. I know i was seen by a ground personnel because he waved, then walked up the jetway. I would never expect anyone to delay a flight for a non-rev, but I do expect our agents to put people on when it will not delay the flight at all. Anyhow, spent the night in a hotel with my family for 7 hours to get up and fly to a different airport 100 miles away from where we need to be. Please just be aware at the end of the night. Non-revving is hard enough as is. We don't need our own employees holding us back. It became obvious to me that we definitely do not have the "Southwest culture."

This summer, my wife and I were non-reving from JFK to SEA. It came down to 3 seats available on the plane, wife and I were 4 and 5. The agent took the family of 3 down to the plane. 5 minutes later, the family came up saying they miscounted and there were only 2 seats available. The agent pushed the plane without coming up to get my wife and I. Then had the balz to ask why we were upset. I wanted to lay into him. I didn't. I told him I bet the CA wouldn't have pushed if he knew he had two DAL employees that could have filled those two seats. LSS, took us 21 hours to get home that day. :mad:

Spudhauler 10-04-2014 12:54 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1739882)
You guys are like a bunch of old women on the CDO thing. I realize it's part of a anti ALPA rhetoric to keep bringing them up but here is the simple truth. The company can take them or leave them. They are not pushing for them. CDO's originated with the pilot group. If the contract survey shows they are not wanted that will be the end of the story. Find something new to whine about. If you're concerned about them then get your survey filled out.

Sailing, you often have decent stuff to post, but then you post this kind of anti-pilot drivel. I've done CDOs, and they suck. Never have I had any poll done by ALPA until the contract survey to see if I wanted them. It was killed in the LOA, and that should have been the end of it. Your calling those of us who've done them and know that they are inherently unsafe a bunch of old women makes you look like what some here accuse you of; a guy who sits behind a desk and doesn't fly much.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:43 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands