![]() |
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1807092)
All these cost neutral agreements have taken us from the bottom of the industry to the top in a relatively short time. They have doubled my pay on the same equipment.
|
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 1807113)
What airline do you work for? RA has seen his pay double, but I don't think any line pilot has seen pay double unless you upgraded.
|
Originally Posted by DeadHead
(Post 1807078)
I love contract negotiation season here on the "latest and greatest".... :)
|
Sailing,
If "they" had doubled your pay, you would see a pay rate that is double. If by your actions you double your pay then your comments are inaccurate. Am not saying there have not been improvements. There have been, but we have a long way to go. Respectfully |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1807117)
My W2's have doubled. Post bankruptcy I made a 158 per hour. Overtime paid about 238 an hour and no extra at all in vacation or training months in most cases. Since then vacation pay is more, training pay is more. Work rules are better. Retirement is up 3%. My effective hourly rate in 14 was 253 an hour at straight rates and 506 an hour on overtime counting PS. Yes my W2's have doubled.
|
Originally Posted by Flamer
(Post 1807094)
SWA gets 6.5 TFP average. But if you want to set low goals that is cool.
I was under the impression that 6.5TFP was equivalent to 5:42 per the contract comparison put out by the MEC |
Originally Posted by Karnak
(Post 1807081)
The risk to Profit Sharing isn't in section 6, or in bankruptcy! If there are no profits, there is no profit sharing. It's that simple. We've had a good run in the past few years, largely due to our efforts to make this merger work. But we can remember many years when we did our best and there were no profits - and no section 6 or bankruptcy. We can also see other pilots groups with chaotic mergers that are profitable - so maybe there are more factors at work than just great pilots.
What will the profits be in 2017? We can make some reasonable assumptions, just like we make reasonable assumptions about the arrival weather in NRT. But I'm still carrying extra fuel. That's how I think. I think it would be stupid to get rid of Profit Sharing. I like the "share the gain" concept. But I'd prefer to have most of my total compensation in pay rates that require a section 6 negotiation or a trip to the courthouse to be changed - rather than just a "weak economy" or "bad decisions". I think you will agree that most DAL Pilots realize that PS is much more "at risk" than pay rates - but in the long run its all "at risk." One point to point out is that the PS these last few years has been in a "weak economy" and "bad decisions" have been made (upside down on fuel hedges......................again). Most importantly PS in any given year is at risk but guys on here are portraying that it may go away forever. The industry has indeed changed and we are a much leaner, more competitive company than a decade ago. I am willing to risk the PS on a yearly basis partly because I think anything that could possibly permanently affect profitability would also very quickly trigger the "trip to the courthouse." Let me ask you: If we are making industry leading wages and the company gets hit with a black swan event how long do think management will wait before pushing for relief? I imagine the Wall ST types will be howling like mad if we are making big $$$ and the shareholders are missing out on all the fun. Scoop- just my 2 cents. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1807092)
All these cost neutral agreements have taken us from the bottom of the industry to the top in a relatively short time. They have doubled my pay on the same equipment.
OK. Wait. I think I get it. You're using DALPA math. Change the work rules so we work 85 hours instead of 75 and call it a raise. Geez sailing. Don't you think guys know the pay rates? Sometimes I think you forget who your audience is. |
Originally Posted by bohicagain
(Post 1807157)
I was under the impression that 6.5TFP was equivalent to 5:42 per the contract comparison put out by the MEC
|
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1807188)
Karnak,
I think you will agree that most DAL Pilots realize that PS is much more "at risk" than pay rates - but in the long run its all "at risk."
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1807188)
One point to point out is that the PS these last few years has been in a "weak economy" and "bad decisions" have been made (upside down on fuel hedges......................again).
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1807188)
Most importantly PS in any given year is at risk but guys on here are portraying that it may go away forever. The industry has indeed changed and we are a much leaner, more competitive company than a decade ago.
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1807188)
I am willing to risk the PS on a yearly basis partly because I think anything that could possibly permanently affect profitability would also very quickly trigger the "trip to the courthouse."
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1807188)
Let me ask you: If we are making industry leading wages and the company gets hit with a black swan event how long do think management will wait before pushing for relief? I imagine the Wall ST types will be howling like mad if we are making big $$$ and the shareholders are missing out on all the fun.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:42 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands