|
|
Originally Posted by Jughead135
(Post 1825726)
I don't believe that's true (proration)--I think it's 50 hours during the initial "sick year" (start date through May 31), regardless of length.
You can check pretty easily in iCrew.... Check out the table in 14.D.1.f. of the PWA. |
Originally Posted by illini90
(Post 1825776)
After a reroute today, I lost my 30 hr layover that I needed to make my next trip work. Instead, I have a 9:01 layover tomorrow night, with a DH the next day. If I take a later DH, I don't get my 30 Hrs. So my question is, can they give me a 9:01 layover? What is the minimum, since it is an east coast trip that will most certainly get delayed?
Little help? Thanks! |
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 1825783)
I thought I'd seen, perhaps, the worst movie ever yesterday when I sat through the new SpongeBob flick with my kids.
I was wrong. Was it this one http://www.joblo.com/images_arrownew...number%202.JPG |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1825704)
I would call it what it is...Compensation based on the past 12 months financial performance. Which means it's impossible to predict and impossible for the NMB to quantify (or account for) in future years of a contract.
Carl |
Originally Posted by illini90
(Post 1825776)
After a reroute today, I lost my 30 hr layover that I needed to make my next trip work. Instead, I have a 9:01 layover tomorrow night, with a DH the next day. If I take a later DH, I don't get my 30 Hrs. So my question is, can they give me a 9:01 layover? What is the minimum, since it is an east coast trip that will most certainly get delayed?
Originally Posted by illini90
(Post 1825823)
Little help? Thanks!
The answer is yes they can give you a 9:01 layover if it meets the rest requirements for all the surrounding flight duty periods and the contractual break in duty requirements. Keep in mind that deadhead only periods are not flight duty periods but deadhead segments occurring at the beginning or middle of the period are part of the FDP. When they are at the end of the FDP then they are not. You do realize that if a reroute causes your next trip to "not work" because of 117 rest issues, then you are pay protected. That would normally be considered a good deal. Let them take your 30 hour break. You might have recovery obligations though. It depends. We would need a lot more detail to give you the answer you are looking for I think. |
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1825862)
Need more information to answer your question. Its a bit convoluted.
The answer is yes they can give you a 9:01 layover if it meets the rest requirements for all the surrounding flight duty periods and the contractual break in duty requirements. Keep in mind that deadhead only periods are not flight duty periods but deadhead segments occurring at the beginning or middle of the period are part of the FDP. When they are at the end of the FDP then they are not. You do realize that if a reroute causes your next trip to "not work" because of 117 rest issues, then you are pay protected. That would normally be considered a good deal. Let them take your 30 hour break. You might have recovery obligations though. It depends. We would need a lot more detail to give you the answer you are looking for I think. |
Originally Posted by illini90
(Post 1825865)
Ok..thanks for the answer, I appreciate it. I guess we'll see what the day brings...
|
Originally Posted by Elliot
(Post 1825797)
Watched the movie 'American Sniper' today with my bride. Never before have I been in a movie theater that remained as quiet as it did for the entire movie.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1825850)
So it's at risk compensation! We agree on something!
Singling out profit sharing and describing it as the exclusive "at risk" portion of our contract is being done for the specific purpose of lowering its value in the minds of pilots. If you and DALPA are successful at doing so, it will be easier for the MEC administration to call it a victory when they use a reduction in our profit sharing to fund hourly rate increases. Key to this strategy is the tactic of a constant drumbeat of devaluing profit sharing. Once again, here is how I answered your question of what we should call profit sharing in front if the NMB:
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1825704)
I would call it what it is...Compensation based on the past 12 months financial performance. Which means it's impossible to predict and impossible for the NMB to quantify (or account for) in future years of a contract.
Carl |
Originally Posted by daldude
(Post 1825909)
Yes the directors technique of having no music or sound at the end and during the credits was very effective.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:35 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands