Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

acl65pilot 11-17-2009 09:50 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 713053)
FWIW, Ed Bastian just last week said the DC9-30/40's will be retired over the next 18 months keeping them flying THROUGH 2010.

Always subject to change of course. ;)

Makes sense to me with the plan they have going forward. It has been the plan all along, people just wanted to argue it.

MD-90's will replace most of it. As we uptick the 757's in the desert will return and the 88's on current 757 routes will back fill the 9 flying. There is a plan and it makes sense.

acl65pilot 11-17-2009 09:51 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 713052)
Who is on top ACL?

Depends on your perspective I guess. Some will always be on the bottom no matter what is going on! :D

Desperado 11-17-2009 09:52 AM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 713058)
Depends on your perspective I guess. Some will always be on the bottom no matter what is going on! :D


It ain't easy bein' green!

upndsky 11-17-2009 09:55 AM


Originally Posted by slowplay (Post 713043)
Second, where are the 7% increase numbers coming from? If they came from Steve Dickson's lounge chat, the words are important. Was it an increase over this summer's (2009) pilot block hours, or over the announced reduced 2010 planned block hours? The difference is substantial.

...

Don't drink the koolaid too much, in either direction. There are 11 747-200 that will be parked which were flying last summer. We're parking over 30 DC-9 30/40 by the end of next year, and only have 11 aircraft deliveries over that time, the vast majority backloaded. We do have some capacity in the desert that can be pulled out, but that only requires a 60 day lead time to get the heavy checks done.

Slow, those are good points. I am guessing people are latching on the numbers I posted about SD's lounge chat. There was a lot being said in many different ways during the visit. I didn't think to pay attention to the difference you mentioned. My interpretation -- and this is strictly mine -- is that the 7% increase is over what network had planned earlier this year. Dickson said that network adjusts their numbers all the time. He didn't specifically say over what the 7% increase was or if he did, I didn't pay attention to it. He did say that with the increase, we would be properly staffed for the summer, so take that for what it is.

As for the airplanes, someone did ask if the fleet is shrinking or growing. Dickson, in a round about way without getting into number, said that the fleet would remain pretty much even. Yes, we're parking the -200s and the -30/40s, but we're still getting a few 777 and 737, plus at least another 9 or so MD90s. Plus we have the extra capacity sitting in the dessert. My interpretation of what BW said hinted that if the 7% increase comes to fruition, some of those airplanes would need to come back out of the desert.

As a bottom scraper, I hope we hire but nothing I heard made me think that. Like you said, if there is, it would be minimal. Now, there may be other dots that are out there that I haven't seen yet that could change that picture, but based strictly on what was said at the lounge visit, this is how I see things. I do feel that the chances of furloughs are greatly diminishing.

I wish someone else on this board was at the meeting to give their take on what they heard, even if it is to refute what I have written. Again, all this was just MY take on what was said. My interpretations could be way off base.

acl65pilot 11-17-2009 09:56 AM


Originally Posted by Desperado (Post 713059)
It ain't easy bein' green!

Ain't that the truth!

I like this pic but I am still looking for a better one! :o

acl65pilot 11-17-2009 10:03 AM


Originally Posted by upndsky (Post 713061)
Slow, those are good points. I am guessing people are latching on the numbers I posted about SD's lounge chat. There was a lot being said in many different ways during the visit. I didn't think to pay attention to the difference you mentioned. My interpretation -- and this is strictly mine -- is that the 7% increase is over what network had planned earlier this year. Dickson said that network adjusts their numbers all the time. He didn't specifically say over what the 7% increase was or if he did, I didn't pay attention to it. He did say that with the increase, we would be properly staffed for the summer, so take that for what it is.

As for the airplanes, someone did ask if the fleet is shrinking or growing. Dickson, in a round about way without getting into number, said that the fleet would remain pretty much even. Yes, we're parking the -200s and the -30/40s, but we're still getting a few 777 and 737, plus at least another 9 or so MD90s. Plus we have the extra capacity sitting in the dessert. My interpretation of what BW said hinted that if the 7% increase comes to fruition, some of those airplanes would need to come back out of the desert.

As a bottom scraper, I hope we hire but nothing I heard made me think that. Like you said, if there is, it would be minimal. Now, there may be other dots that are out there that I haven't seen yet that could change that picture, but based strictly on what was said at the lounge visit, this is how I see things. I do feel that the chances of furloughs are greatly diminishing.

I wish someone else on this board was at the meeting to give their take on what they heard, even if it is to refute what I have written. Again, all this was just MY take on what was said. My interpretations could be way off base.

I was told 7% YOY not a 7% bump for the summer traffic. In the end it really does not matter. It will matter if we hire, or if pink slips go out. That said, the exact quote that I was told is, "We are a lot closer to hiring than we are to furloughing." That says a lot without being to committed one way or another.

The plan a few weeks ago was a 2-3% increase YOY. RA stated that at the LCA meeting. Fact is that since that meeting the facts have changed. Slow knows that, he is just trying to put some sort of non-combustible fluid on a small fire before it gets out of hand. He also did it in a diplomatic way as well. (had another comment but why destroy a good thing) Slow, admitted what I see. A POSSIBLE need for hiring based upon a 7% YOY number.

Also, the 2009 to 2010 numbers for summer block hrs were about flat. We will have a lot of training going on outside of the shoulder months as well. That will also eat up a lot of manning that we would otherwise have. They would like to shut the school house down from April to Sept, but with this merger that is not going to be possible. That adds a need as well.

upndsky 11-17-2009 10:09 AM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 713068)
I was told 7% YOY not a 7% bump for the summer traffic. In the end it really does not matter. It will matter if we hire, or if pink slips go out. That said, the exact quote that I was told is, "We are a lot closer to hiring than we are to furloughing." That says a lot without being to committed one way or another.

That's probably right. These lounge visits are fairly casual so the way information is presented is naturally vague. He said 7% increase and that's all I heard. It didn't dawn on me to ask "7% higher than what?" If you heard from another source that it's 7% YOY, than that's probably what SD was referring to. Again, I was listening to the gist, not the exact words.

johnso29 11-17-2009 10:15 AM

Anybody know if my recall rights to the 320 are domicile specific? I was displaced from DTW 320B, so if there are openings in MSP 320B, but NOT DTW 320B, would my recall rights still give me first crack?

Of course there were quite a bit of MSP 320B displacements on the last AE, weren't there? 1234, you're a MSP 320B. Do you know how many there were?

NuGuy 11-17-2009 10:16 AM

Heyas,

All we need now is a nice 100 seat order announced, and things would be verging on interesting.

Nu

acl65pilot 11-17-2009 10:17 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 713076)
Anybody know if my recall rights to the 320 domicile specific? I was displaced from DTW 320B, so if there are openings in MSP 320B, but NOT DTW 320B, would my recall rights still give me first crack?


31. “Category” means the combination of a pilot’s position and base.

Definition of a "category" per PWA Section 2.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:06 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands