Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 04-12-2015 | 11:26 AM
  #180701  
flyallnite's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Cessna 172N. And after you work out the numbers it's basically close to the rental price for one but splitting it in between 2 or 3 people helps. But what Nu said, best thing is to get a Sailingfun Applie Ipad and fly mostly when airports are VFR.

I've been researching this a lot.
I've flown my share of seriously crapped out rental GA airplanes, and have no desire to put myself or my family in one now. Nor do I relish the thought of single engine night IFR over shark infested waters during hurricane season.

What I would like is to be able to rent a plane in say, Florida for a spell, fly 4 people down to some of the Keys or maybe the Bahamas with enough IFR capability to get out of a jam if I had to. Like a Bonanza or a Saratoga maybe. Then on occasion, be able to fly out of another part of the country, say Arizona, in a similar aircraft and go mess around in Mexico or Vegas or something. I wonder if there are any clubs that would have a network like that...?
Old 04-12-2015 | 12:33 PM
  #180702  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by flyallnite
I've flown my share of seriously crapped out rental GA airplanes, and have no desire to put myself or my family in one now. Nor do I relish the thought of single engine night IFR over shark infested waters during hurricane season.

What I would like is to be able to rent a plane in say, Florida for a spell, fly 4 people down to some of the Keys or maybe the Bahamas with enough IFR capability to get out of a jam if I had to. Like a Bonanza or a Saratoga maybe. Then on occasion, be able to fly out of another part of the country, say Arizona, in a similar aircraft and go mess around in Mexico or Vegas or something. I wonder if there are any clubs that would have a network like that...?
Try these:

Alman Bonanza Club Miami Florida
Old 04-12-2015 | 12:44 PM
  #180703  
Doug Masters's Avatar
Weekend and Holiday Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 1
From: Sippin' at the Troubadour
Default

While we're discussing non reving I just learned that the parents of some mucky muck management guy used S2s. Not cool. Should be S3C like the rest of our folks.
Old 04-12-2015 | 12:45 PM
  #180704  
NuGuy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,105
Likes: 100
Default

Originally Posted by flyallnite
I've flown my share of seriously crapped out rental GA airplanes, and have no desire to put myself or my family in one now. Nor do I relish the thought of single engine night IFR over shark infested waters during hurricane season.

What I would like is to be able to rent a plane in say, Florida for a spell, fly 4 people down to some of the Keys or maybe the Bahamas with enough IFR capability to get out of a jam if I had to. Like a Bonanza or a Saratoga maybe. Then on occasion, be able to fly out of another part of the country, say Arizona, in a similar aircraft and go mess around in Mexico or Vegas or something. I wonder if there are any clubs that would have a network like that...?
One of the casualties of the post 9/11 world was the total lack of anything on the rental line more complicated than a 172RG or Arrow.

Anything that is even remotely capable, like a 182RG or 'toga is priced in orbit or has some ridiculous rental requirements (15 hour check out, etc).

Back in the day, it used to be if you did a checkout in a complex aircraft (say a 182), you got a automatic pass on everything "below" it (say a 172 & 152)...Common sense prevailed.

Not these days...silly rules seem to be the norm....like a 5 hour checkout for a 172.

I want to say there is a group that's trying to do the "networked" club thing, but the name escapes me at the moment.

Nu
Old 04-12-2015 | 12:48 PM
  #180705  
NuGuy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,105
Likes: 100
Default

Originally Posted by thefoxsays
The best advice is just do the job the way the company wants. And no problem.
That's all well and good, but be sure you know what it is that the company wants...and not what was posted on teh interwebz.

Nu
Old 04-12-2015 | 12:54 PM
  #180706  
satchip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 0
From: Flying the SEC
Default

Originally Posted by Doug Masters
I have a solution. Just get rid of all the HKs. Problem solved.
No kidding! They are becoming like Ebay snipers. Wait until the last minute to request to get on the earlier flight, knocking your wife out of a seat.
Old 04-12-2015 | 01:11 PM
  #180707  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,876
Likes: 193
Default

Originally Posted by satchip
No kidding! They are becoming like Ebay snipers. Wait until the last minute to request to get on the earlier flight, knocking your wife out of a seat.
If a passenger is requesting to go on a earlier flight they will not show up as a HK. A HK is a confirmed passenger who is not assigned a specific seat. They do show up on the travel net availability page. If someone has a ticket on a later flight but ops to try and go early they show up as a SDSB (same day standby)
Old 04-12-2015 | 01:20 PM
  #180708  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Well first Carl I never said it was a Fom violation or that it happened at Delta. They most certainly did however suspend his ticket for 30 days.
OK, it wasn't an FOM violation. Then what was the FAA violation? What FAR says you have to be redispatched if you return to the gate for any reason? The FAA would never suspend someone's ticket for 30 days without an FAR violation to back it up.

Again, I think you've made the whole thing up. I have no idea why you do this.

Originally Posted by sailingfun
A friend from NW tells me they also required a new release if you returned to the gate.
Your friend was wrong.

Originally Posted by sailingfun
It's pretty standard at every airline and yes the FAA does require a 121 flight be released by dispatch.
Everyone knows a 121 flight needs to be released by dispatch sailingfun. We're talking about whether you need a re-release if you return to the gate for any reason or the FAA will suspend your ticket for 30 days as you've alleged.

You need to admit you exaggerated a story to make some strange point. There is no such FAR, and the FAA would never suspend your license for 30 days for an alleged FOM violation. Stop digging!

Carl
Old 04-12-2015 | 01:46 PM
  #180709  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by JungleBus
Two airlines I worked at previously required a rerelease if the aircraft had moved under its own power. I know that's not the case at Delta but it seems very strange that the FAA would approve both of those FOMs (one of which was written by NWA people and patterned after the NWA FOM) if that proviso was contrary to the regulations.
The FAA wouldn't have approved it if it was in contravention of an FAR. That's exactly the point. There is only an FAR that states your flight must be released by dispatch. There is no FAR that talks about returning to the gate and requiring a re-dispatch. A re-dispatch requirement can be made by airlines for many reasons and not be in contravention of an FAR...because such an FAR doesn't exist.

Originally Posted by JungleBus
OTOH, sailing is 100% correct that many of the provisions of the FOM have the full force of regulations.
The only instance where that's true is when the FOM mirrors an existing FAR. When they don't, the FAA doesn't get involved.

Originally Posted by JungleBus
For example, there is no FAR 91 or 121 requirement to fly a stabilized approach, it's a FOM requirement...but I have no doubt that if I continued an unstabilized approach to landing with a fed in the jumpseat, I'd get a violation.
You might if the unstable parameter was really egregious, but it wouldn't be because you violated an FOM requirement. It would be because of an FAR such as reckless operation of an aircraft. There has to be an FAR to back up any FAA enforcement action.

This nonsense of FAA violations for FOM violations raises its head occasionally by LCA's or others who try to scare people into compliance with company policy. Truth is, there's probably not a single flight we ever fly where we are not in violation of some company proscribed policy.

Carl
Old 04-12-2015 | 02:00 PM
  #180710  
flyallnite's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Default

Originally Posted by Doug Masters
While we're discussing non reving I just learned that the parents of some mucky muck management guy used S2s. Not cool. Should be S3C like the rest of our folks.
My folks got S2s when I wasn't married. The high higher-ups in MGMT get PS. RA sometimes flies on a Delta Private Jet, a Citation 10.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices