Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

RetiredFTS 05-18-2015 09:52 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1883233)
Couldn't agree more. Until Jesse gets back, I'll try to fill in:


http://s.likes-media.com/img/34cb0a9...be466.600x.jpg


Carl

I wonder if she has any hobbies?

forgot to bid 05-18-2015 10:03 AM


Originally Posted by RetiredFTS (Post 1883254)
I wonder if she has any hobbies?

Hobbies are things you do for free.

So no she probably doesn't.

scambo1 05-18-2015 10:08 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1883233)
Couldn't agree more. Until Jesse gets back, I'll try to fill in:


http://s.likes-media.com/img/34cb0a9...be466.600x.jpg


Carl

Lunch time! Thanks for the reminder.:D

Ed Harley 05-18-2015 10:37 AM

100 seat flying?
 
So, I recently flew with a guy who seemed to be pretty sure that part of our new TA involves an order for several 90-100 seat airplanes, which also meant the parking of more 50 seaters, and possibly some relief on the addition of 76 seaters.

Haven't seen anyone on here talk about that scenario much. I don't like the idea of more 76 seaters, but if we can get 100 seaters on property as growth, I think we'll come out ahead.

Piklepausepull 05-18-2015 10:57 AM

Probably replacement jets for the 88-90 fleet!

And so it goes...........
.
.
.
.
.
.
.downhill for pay purposes!

EdGrimley 05-18-2015 10:57 AM


Originally Posted by Ed Harley (Post 1883280)
So, I recently flew with a guy who seemed to be pretty sure that part of our new TA involves an order for several 90-100 seat airplanes, which also meant the parking of more 50 seaters, and possibly some relief on the addition of 76 seaters.

Haven't seen anyone on here talk about that scenario much. I don't like the idea of more 76 seaters, but if we can get 100 seaters on property as growth, I think we'll come out ahead.

In the immortal words of TSquareBender.....Lulz.

Mesabah 05-18-2015 11:36 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1883233)
Couldn't agree more. Until Jesse gets back, I'll try to fill in:


http://s.likes-media.com/img/34cb0a9...be466.600x.jpg


Carl

The plastic surgeon forgot to put the nipples back on.

Alan Shore 05-18-2015 11:39 AM


Originally Posted by Sink r8 (Post 1883216)
...it sure feels like the Req side is being heavily manipulated.

It should not be, as it is a number derived from a specific and objective formula. If it ever does appear to be manipulated, I would strongly recommend calling the MEC Scheduling Committee and letting them know.

forgot to bid 05-18-2015 11:44 AM


Originally Posted by Ed Harley (Post 1883280)
So, I recently flew with a guy who seemed to be pretty sure that part of our new TA involves an order for several 90-100 seat airplanes, which also meant the parking of more 50 seaters, and possibly some relief on the addition of 76 seaters.

Haven't seen anyone on here talk about that scenario much. I don't like the idea of more 76 seaters, but if we can get 100 seaters on property as growth, I think we'll come out ahead.

But we already have a 100 seater.

http://atwairport.com/wp-atwappleton...17-763x400.jpg


Originally Posted by Piklepausepull (Post 1883299)
Probably replacement jets for the 88-90 fleet!

And so it goes...........
.
.
.
.
.
.
.downhill for pay purposes!

88-90 replacements

http://img.planespotters.net/photo/3...Net_323904.jpg


And if they need relief on 76 seaters they can have some. In fact, how many 76 seaters do they need? They can have them. As many as they want.

As long as we fly them.

Sink r8 05-18-2015 11:55 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1883233)
Couldn't agree more. Until Jesse gets back, I'll try to fill in:


http://s.likes-media.com/img/34cb0a9...be466.600x.jpg


Carl

Well, that's two things we agree on.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:35 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands