Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2015 | 03:06 PM
  #185841  
TenYearsGone's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,039
Likes: 0
From: 7ERB
Default

Points taken, thank you.

As a Domestic pilot--> 24/7 was hit upon me. More than a couple of times I was afforded 24 hours off of duty, at home because of the threat of working or being on duty for 7 days straight.

I am almost, 80%, certain. If you look at the definition of the FAR duties/rest, you can conclude the same.

Not to beat a dead horse, but 117 seems to be better for the Regional Airlines. I, for one, feel like I work more and harder on 117..

117 seems to be a band-aid, administered to the Legacy Airlines by the FAA, to help mitigate a pilot shortage by creating a more efficient and more productive work group. And 117 is a way to fortify our US Airline economy by keeping us churning.

We all know what really would happen if true safety regulations were adopted:

1)US airlines will go belly up
2)Slave ship, non work rule, Airlines like Emirates will flourish

TEN
Old 10-29-2015 | 03:15 PM
  #185842  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,876
Likes: 193
Default

Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
Points taken, thank you.

As a Domestic pilot--> 24/7 was hit upon me. More than a couple of times I was afforded 24 hours off of duty, at home because of the threat of working or being on duty for 7 days straight.

I am almost, 80%, certain. If you look at the definition of the FAR duties/rest, you can conclude the same.

Not to beat a dead horse, but 117 seems to be better for the Regional Airlines. I, for one, feel like I work more and harder on 117..

117 seems to be a band-aid, administered to the Legacy Airlines by the FAA, to help mitigate a pilot shortage by creating a more efficient and more productive work group. And 117 is a way to fortify our US Airline economy by keeping us churning.

We all know what really would happen if true safety regulations were adopted:

1)US airlines will go belly up
2)Slave ship, non work rule, Airlines like Emirates will flourish

TEN
I would disagree on the more productive part. The old rule was 100 hours in a month domestic or 120 hours a month international. The change to 100 hours in any 28 day rolling period has had a big impact on major airlines. Trips now have to be constantly broken up to find pilots to fly them which adds a ton of DH time. I know my company hates the 100 hour rule.
Old 10-29-2015 | 03:29 PM
  #185843  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I would disagree on the more productive part. The old rule was 100 hours in a month domestic or 120 hours a month international. The change to 100 hours in any 28 day rolling period has had a big impact on major airlines. Trips now have to be constantly broken up to find pilots to fly them which adds a ton of DH time. I know my company hates the 100 hour rule.
That's another point that should be considered. 117 has a 28 day lookback for 100 block hours. Domestically, the old rules reset the lookback at the beginning of every month, meaning you could fly 30 hours in the last 7 days of one month and 90 hours in the first 21 days of the next month, totaling 120 hours in the previous 28 days.

While 117 eliminated the 30 block hour limit in 7 days, it instituted a 100 block hour limit in 28 days, whereas the old rule allowed 120 hours in 28 days over month-to-month transitions, domestically.
Old 10-29-2015 | 03:40 PM
  #185844  
RockyBoy's Avatar
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,599
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by 404yxl
So I only worked at Compass post 117 and never worked at another 121 carrier prior to that. Got it. That means I started at Compass no earlier than 2014.

Why do you think someone that worked pre-117 has to agree with you? I did and I actually find myself getting more time at home, more rest, while work less flight duty hours than I did pre-117.

Why do you think I am lying?

And for the record, I actually like flying a productive 35 hour 5 day trip with low flight duty periods that don't exceed 10-12 hours max. The old rules sucked with 16 hour flight duty periods. You can fly 70+ hours in two 5 day blocks of work and have 3 large off day blocks in a month. Under the old rules, you would need at least 3 work blocks to achieve 70+ hours. There are some benefits to no 30 block hour in 7 limit anymore. I believe the 60 flight duty limit in 7 days does a good job mitigating exhaustion.

I always felt more tired when I had a lot of flight duty hours in 7 days. I think that was the reasoning behind the FAA to institute a 60 hour flight duty limit in 7 days, since they said anything over that was causing pilots to lose effectiveness. Remember 80+ hours could happen pre-117.
I guess 80+ hours could and did happen at some of the regional airlines pre 117. I will give you that. That is really the entire reason the rules were changed in the first place. I honestly can't remember doing anything much more than 70 when I worked at Coex, but I might have done. I do remember going home a day early on lots of occasions when the 30 in 7 block limit kicked in. I know I had never been gone from home longer than 5 days in my career pre 117 and now it happens regularly and I get my rest in a hotel in Fargo instead of at home. NOT better in any way.

117 is better for rest on layovers. That is a good change. If I were king I would require the 30 hours to be in the pilots domicile and not count layovers for that rest. But I'll never be king so I'll just complain about it.

If we disagree, no hard feelings. You regional guys still work way harder than you should no matter what the regs say. 3 leg days are punishment for me anymore. (still remember 9 legs days in the Brasilia in the summer in Houston)
Old 10-29-2015 | 03:45 PM
  #185845  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
Default

Back in the day, DAL lines were blocked at 73:00, 74:00. Max pay was 75, every thing else was carry over (Banked). 16, 17 days off, you could live with it. Just watch out for the 2 engine ferries with the Stinsons.......
Old 10-29-2015 | 03:48 PM
  #185846  
RockyBoy's Avatar
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,599
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by 404yxl
And for the record, I actually like flying a productive 35 hour 5 day trip with low flight duty periods that don't exceed 10-12 hours max.
Dang....I just did a 5-day that paid 26 hours. We never see domestic 5-days worth more than about 30. Most of ours pay 26-28. 4-days are almost all 21 hours. I would love flying a domestic 5 day worth 35 hours......just not 2 of them back to back.

I ususally fly 3 5 days a month for about 75-80 hours. Sometimes I'll pick up a 2 day to get a little more. Doing 2 5-days a month plus a 2 day for the same 80 hours would be awesome. I'd probably just complain that there were too many legs and too short of layovers though so maybe not.
Old 10-29-2015 | 03:58 PM
  #185847  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RockyBoy
Dang....I just did a 5-day that paid 26 hours. We never see domestic 5-days worth more than about 30. Most of ours pay 26-28. 4-days are almost all 21 hours. I would love flying a domestic 5 day worth 35 hours......just not 2 of them back to back.

I ususally fly 3 5 days a month for about 75-80 hours. Sometimes I'll pick up a 2 day to get a little more. Doing 2 5-days a month plus a 2 day for the same 80 hours would be awesome. I'd probably just complain that there were too many legs and too short of layovers though so maybe not.
Yeah, you'd be amazed at how they can make trips productive if they really need to. I thought 30/7 going away would suck, but in my mind I think I always was more tired due to a lot of flight duty hours in 7 and not really the block. The really lucky pilots snagged some of the 38 hour 5 day trips we had and got their 75 hours in just 2 work blocks totaling 10 days. Really great for the commuter. We did have one pilot fly 6 MSP-YVR daytrips in a row for 42 hours of pay and 58 hours of flight duty. I bet he was tired after that, but he didn't need to work a lot for the rest of the month.

And don't think I disagree with you that a pilot should get at least a day off at home every 7 if they want. I think it sucks that it is not in the contract. If I had a preference, it would be that no pilot would be forced into anything longer than 4 days of work in a row and that they would also be given at least 2 days off every 7 if they wanted.
Old 10-29-2015 | 05:19 PM
  #185848  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 27
Default

Originally Posted by 404yxl
Yeah, you'd be amazed at how they can make trips productive if they really need to. I thought 30/7 going away would suck, but in my mind I think I always was more tired due to a lot of flight duty hours in 7 and not really the block. The really lucky pilots snagged some of the 38 hour 5 day trips we had and got their 75 hours in just 2 work blocks totaling 10 days. Really great for the commuter. We did have one pilot fly 6 MSP-YVR daytrips in a row for 42 hours of pay and 58 hours of flight duty. I bet he was tired after that, but he didn't need to work a lot for the rest of the month.

And don't think I disagree with you that a pilot should get at least a day off at home every 7 if they want. I think it sucks that it is not in the contract. If I had a preference, it would be that no pilot would be forced into anything longer than 4 days of work in a row and that they would also be given at least 2 days off every 7 if they wanted.
Yeah. JB recently instituted max 6 days on followed by 2 days off for line holders (unless waived by pilot).
Old 10-29-2015 | 05:57 PM
  #185849  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Default

Is it true that Delta won't hire pilots who took longer than 5 years to finish their 4 year degrees?
Old 10-29-2015 | 06:52 PM
  #185850  
Doug Masters's Avatar
Weekend and Holiday Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 1
From: Sippin' at the Troubadour
Default

Originally Posted by FLowpayFO
Is it true that Delta won't hire pilots who took longer than 5 years to finish their 4 year degrees?
I crammed 4 years into 6 so I guess not
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices