![]() |
|
|
Brand new, unprecedented, exciting technology coming soon to a 737 near you:
A Hot Mic |
Originally Posted by Doug Masters
(Post 2022026)
Brand new, unprecedented, exciting technology coming soon to a 737 near you:
A Hot Mic |
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 2021876)
I agree with all that. I got nothing against AQFOs doing those flights.
I'm just saying the company can't make this change while we are in Section 6 unless we agree to it. If its not a big issue then management shouldn't mind stopping it. It is not a matter a matter of pilots saying no to everything the company wants merely to be adversarial. The company wanted us to take a concessions laden TA. We voted no. We are in section 6 and almost anything that is outside status quo is a violation. The company has been dealing with this issue, for more than a few years now at the current manning, and they have managed. We did not accept their OE carve out and suddenly they start doing this? At some point we have to stop being so amenable to any change they want simply to go along. They want something? So do we. We want a fair contract. |
Originally Posted by Dynamohum
(Post 2022038)
Yes. This right here!
It is not a matter a matter of pilots saying no to everything the company wants merely to be adversarial. The company wanted us to take a concessions laden TA. We voted no. We are in section 6 and almost anything that is outside status quo is a violation. The company has been dealing with this issue, for more than a few years now at the current manning, and they have managed. We did not accept their OE carve out and suddenly they start doing this? At some point we have to stop being so amenable to any change they want simply to go along. They want something? So do we. We want a fair contract. |
Originally Posted by Hawaii50
(Post 2022035)
Really? When? Do you still have to get the "adapter" from around the morning newspaper?
|
Originally Posted by Dynamohum
(Post 2022038)
Yes. This right here!
It is not a matter a matter of pilots saying no to everything the company wants merely to be adversarial. The company wanted us to take a concessions laden TA. We voted no. We are in section 6 and almost anything that is outside status quo is a violation. The company has been dealing with this issue, for more than a few years now at the current manning, and they have managed. We did not accept their OE carve out and suddenly they start doing this? At some point we have to stop being so amenable to any change they want simply to go along. They want something? So do we. We want a fair contract. |
Originally Posted by waldo135
(Post 2022053)
Ok, who's going to convince the necessary number of guys to be LCA? 2% in NYC 717 that has constant turnover isn't going to cut it. You can't have it both ways. Don't just b!tch about the problem unless you bring a solution to the discussion.
|
deleted...
|
Originally Posted by waldo135
(Post 2022053)
Ok, who's going to convince the necessary number of guys to be LCA? 2% in NYC 717 that has constant turnover isn't going to cut it. You can't have it both ways. Don't just b!tch about the problem unless you bring a solution to the discussion.
Now when are we going to hear something from Malone acknowledging all these status quo violations? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:35 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands