Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2009 | 09:38 AM
  #19371  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

DAL has options on other 777s as well. Those would be DALS bids first.

As someone mentioned, what if DAL converts 787's to 777s. That is where the rub comes in. I am not a litigious person, but think there probably would be a suit in that case. I would rather we have more big jets. That is a good thing.

I must admit a level of concern with regard to JAL and their US routes and AF with the 380. I do not know why we always seem to be the airline that is adjusting, shrinking, etc.

This is not my original thought, but I think it deserves consideration: DAL is the RJ feeder for AF/KLM. We feed their widebodies with our 757s. The ironic thing is that our pilot group is paid less than either of theirs. It doesn't make sense to me why we aren't the one growing like crazy. Someone had pointed out that to hold AF 777 Capt is a 1997 hire date. ****.

Bar; I'm not trying to bum you out.
Old 12-04-2009 | 09:41 AM
  #19372  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

I don't want to start a food fight and reopen the SLI here but, it looks to me, that any 777 deliveries within the 5 year fence that are not deemed "replacement" aircraft, would be fenced as would be any 747 and 787 positions added within the 5 years. Here are the relevant "conditions and restrictions" that I think apply here:

4. For the period of five (5) years beginning with the first bid period after the issuance of the Single Operating Certificate (SOC), no pre-merger Northwest
pilot may be awarded or displaced to a vacancy on a B777 aircraft or category and no pre-merger Delta pilot may be awarded or displaced to a B787 or B747 vacancy.
5. Should the merged company take delivery of any aircraft which is/are a replacement of any aircraft covered by Paragraph 4., the captain positions and, as applicable, the first officer positions on each such replacement aircraft will be allocated in accordance with the Paragraph 4. restrictions on the type it is replacing.
6. Paragraph 4. shall expire on the fifth (5th) anniversary of the SOC. Any bid awards or displacements effective after that date will not be subject to this restriction.


Am I not reading something correctly?

Denny
Old 12-04-2009 | 10:28 AM
  #19373  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Why do we have fences anyways?



But thanks to some new found knowledge, I now know that the 757/767 had an invisible fart fence. That is awesome.
Old 12-04-2009 | 10:45 AM
  #19374  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

A reasonable argument could be made that the 777-200 is clearly a Delta South jet. Where the water gets muddy in a hurry is if 747's start going away to coincide with delivery of 777-300's.

Several airline executives, including our partners, insist our operation of the -200 over the Pacific is the wrong airplane for that mission. They think a 777-300 is much more competitive than the 747 or the 777-200.

It makes no sense to me that we fenced off such a narrow portion of the flying. Shows who's jobs they wanted to protect. IMHO we should have lots of fences to protect lots of people, or none at all. All we'll do in 5 years is get another portion of the list out of seniority and trigger displacements again in ~ 36 months.

Just an opinion.
Old 12-04-2009 | 11:20 AM
  #19375  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Interesting post Bar.

I would've liked no fences personally. Not on the top, middle or bottom but I would always like really strong fences and gates with molten lava, manned by you, when it came to DCI and JVs even if the latter is a very complex issue.

Last edited by forgot to bid; 12-04-2009 at 11:42 AM.
Old 12-04-2009 | 11:25 AM
  #19376  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
It makes no sense to me that we fenced off such a narrow portion of the flying. Shows who's jobs they wanted to protect. IMHO we should have lots of fences to protect lots of people, or none at all. All we'll do in 5 years is get another portion of the list out of seniority and trigger displacements again in ~ 36 months.
I agree. My opinion during the SLI discussions was that the various equities brought by either side should be considered, and used to determine the pecking order. Then everyone would find their place on the list, and get to enjoy the privileges of full membership, so to speak. No restriction, no condition. After all, if a list is fair (enough), you don't need to have bastardized mechanisms to rectify its' conceptual errors. It's either correct, or it isn't.

Besides, any fence (or any differential in rigths for that matter) lessens unity. Which decreases leverage. For everyone involved.
Old 12-04-2009 | 11:27 AM
  #19377  
sinca3's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
Okay, so ALV's are going down and I guess that equates to more flying lines in January.


Anyone have an idea of how many, approximately, this will equate to?
Here is the logic I used, please let me know if my thinking/math is flawed.

(While considering the amount of flying as a constant)
Currently on the NYCM88B, December had 52 REG line holders at an ALV of 82:00. Now for January the ALV is being reduced to 72:30 which I believe will raise the number of REG lines by 7-9 to a total of 60 REG line holders.

52 x 82:00= 4,264:00 REG hours in Decemeber

January Estimate based on December REG hours:
4,264:00 / 72:30 = 58.8 ~ Approximately 59 REG lines


Sound right to you guys? Also why does the company shift the ALV times? I'm sure there is a good reason I'm just not bright enough to connect the dots.
JAN estimated regular lines:

NYC88A-60
NYC88B-58
ATL88A-384
ATL88B-370

Go to Deltanet, crew resources and scheduling, then look on left margin for this info....
Old 12-04-2009 | 11:30 AM
  #19378  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by chuck416
My understanding is that any new a/c not on the fleet plan (I think DAL had two 777s on order, so 'south' guys get dibbs on them) would go to all bidders. The real wrench in the gears--so to speak--is if DAL gets tired of waiting on the 787, and converts those orders to 777-300s. Man, that'd be a food fight. Suppose that's a Q for another day...or maybe someone actually has the answer for that too!
Chuck

The award makes no mention of fleet plans nor does it differentiate between orders or options. BTW, DAL has options with scheduled delivery dates for 27 777s. The only way for a NWA pilot to gain access to a 777, or a DAL pilot to gain access to a 747 or 787 is if there are insufficuient bidders, or the aircraft is a replacement aircraft for either a 777, 747, or 787.

Delta could order 20 747s or 100 787s and as long as there are sufficient bidders and the aircraft aren't a replacement for the 777, than only DAL (N) pilots will fly it while the fence is in place. The same holds true if DAL orders 20 more 777s.

4. For the period of five (5) years beginning with the first bid period after the
issuance of the Single Operating Certificate (SOC), no pre-merger
Northwest pilot may be awarded or displaced to a vacancy on a B777
aircraft or category and no pre-merger Delta pilot may be awarded or
displaced to a B787 or B747 vacancy.

5. Should the merged company take delivery of any aircraft which is/are a
replacement of any aircraft covered by Paragraph 4., the captain positions
and, as applicable, the first officer positions on each such replacement
aircraft will be allocated in accordance with the Paragraph 4. restrictions
on the type it is replacing.

6. Paragraph 4. shall expire on the fifth (5th) anniversary of the SOC. Any
bid awards or displacements effective after that date will not be subject to
this restriction.

7. If there are insufficient bidders from one pre-merger pilot group for a
posted or contingent vacancy on one side of the fence during the period
covered by Paragraph 4., unfilled vacancies may be filled by pilots from the
other pre-merger airline.

8. A pilot awarded a position (via an AE, MD or VD) to a category as a result
of insufficient bidders will, for the purposes of processing future
displacements in accordance with Section 22 F. of the JCBA, be considered
as junior to all pilots from the pre-merger pilot group that was entitled to
that category.
Old 12-04-2009 | 11:30 AM
  #19379  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Snowshoe shopping
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
IMHO we should have lots of fences to protect lots of people, or none at all. All we'll do in 5 years is get another portion of the list out of seniority and trigger displacements again in ~ 36 months.

Just an opinion.
Wholeheartedly agree.

also--how's your "sackful" of pride for "chubby" santa working out this season? everything ok at the north "pole?"
Old 12-04-2009 | 11:39 AM
  #19380  
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
Looking for a laugh
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Oh wait... babys up... the stay at home moms are very confused about me, why am I home so much?... I'm out.
Don't feel bad. My neighbors think I'm a drug dealer. I hang around the house all day for days on end, and then disappear for a few days and reappear.

One accused me of being an agent of the CIA. Every time I'd disappear, something would happen somewhere on the planet and then I'd be home a few days later.


I don't make a real attempt to dissuade them. Seems those are more legit occupations than pilot.....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices