Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Taxi Driver
Posts: 411
If I had a dime...so tired of this silly argument. Lots of us mainline guys were furloughed while all of this happened, and much of it occurred because of bankruptcy and subpar contracts being forced on us rather than just caving. So while these regional jobs were being created, guys you are blaming for scope issues were laid off. But continue your online blame game of the mainline guys; it's refreshing and original.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: ERJ
Posts: 117
If I had a dime...so tired of this silly argument. Lots of us mainline guys were furloughed while all of this happened, and much of it occurred because of bankruptcy and subpar contracts being forced on us rather than just caving. So while these regional jobs were being created, guys you are blaming for scope issues were laid off. But continue your online blame game of the mainline guys; it's refreshing and original.
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Why on earth are there Endeavor pilots on this thread debating about flight benefits? Shut your damn pie holes and go about your business. There is no need or benefit to boast or to kick the bees nest.
Delta pilots and retirees...you won't even notice a difference. Endeavor is such a small group in comparison. Especially spread across the system.
Delta pilots and retirees...you won't even notice a difference. Endeavor is such a small group in comparison. Especially spread across the system.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Taxi Driver
Posts: 411
The mainline could have instead chosen to take pay and contract hits to prevent the outsourcing of their jobs in the first place. And besides, JUNIOR guys were laid off. Probationary guys were laid off. Not the senior guys with voting rights. Not the senior guys who are now happy in retirement. Again, there is no excuse. The choice was still made to sell scope, and not by regional pilots.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: ERJ
Posts: 117
Prove it. You weren't here, didn't see the vote, didn't know what was happening with bankruptcy, yet you seem to know exactly what went on. You're a part of it, too, since you've chosen to work at a regional, so look in the mirror before you start throwing blame around. And yeah, I know who was laid off since I was out for more than 4 years while the regionals exploded. Thanks to management, though, not mainline pilots.
It's just interesting to see the animosity towards regional guys for "celebrating" when they are finally thrown a bone by management, since it was management and mainline pilots together that created the regionals in the first place. No one is out to take away mainline benefits and screw your retirees (even if they screwed everyone else). No regional pilot group has the ability to do so. Any unpleasantness regarding flight benefits should be directed towards management.
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Thanks to both management and mainline pilots. If there was a vote that passed at all, then both are to blame. Be an adult and take responsibility. I chose to join the industry at a time that I knew pilots were in demand and the pay was increasing. And because I love what I do. Just because mainline created the regionals and the road to a major job is tougher then it used to be, doesn't mean I should never have joined the industry. The industry just is what it is, now, thanks to mainline management and its pilots' agreements of the past.
It's just interesting to see the animosity towards regional guys for "celebrating" when they are finally thrown a bone by management, since it was management and mainline pilots together that created the regionals in the first place. No one is out to take away mainline benefits and screw your retirees (even if they screwed everyone else). No regional pilot group has the ability to do so. Any unpleasantness regarding flight benefits should be directed towards management.
It's just interesting to see the animosity towards regional guys for "celebrating" when they are finally thrown a bone by management, since it was management and mainline pilots together that created the regionals in the first place. No one is out to take away mainline benefits and screw your retirees (even if they screwed everyone else). No regional pilot group has the ability to do so. Any unpleasantness regarding flight benefits should be directed towards management.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Thanks to both management and mainline pilots. If there was a vote that passed at all, then both are to blame. Be an adult and take responsibility. I chose to join the industry at a time that I knew pilots were in demand and the pay was increasing. And because I love what I do. Just because mainline created the regionals and the road to a major job is tougher then it used to be, doesn't mean I should never have joined the industry. The industry just is what it is, now, thanks to mainline management and its pilots' agreements of the past.
It's just interesting to see the animosity towards regional guys for "celebrating" when they are finally thrown a bone by management, since it was management and mainline pilots together that created the regionals in the first place. No one is out to take away mainline benefits and screw your retirees (even if they screwed everyone else). No regional pilot group has the ability to do so. Any unpleasantness regarding flight benefits should be directed towards management.
It's just interesting to see the animosity towards regional guys for "celebrating" when they are finally thrown a bone by management, since it was management and mainline pilots together that created the regionals in the first place. No one is out to take away mainline benefits and screw your retirees (even if they screwed everyone else). No regional pilot group has the ability to do so. Any unpleasantness regarding flight benefits should be directed towards management.
There was a time where the majors hired such a high percentage of military that a civilian pilot had to practically have a PHD and 10,000 hours of heavy time to be considered.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: ERJ
Posts: 117
The road to the mainline is easier today not harder as you state. The days of needing 2500 hours total time and 250 hours multi before a regional would look at you are long gone! Consider yourself lucky.
There was a time where the majors hired such a high percentage of military that a civilian pilot had to practically have a PHD and 10,000 hours of heavy time to be considered.
There was a time where the majors hired such a high percentage of military that a civilian pilot had to practically have a PHD and 10,000 hours of heavy time to be considered.
Edit: This is not a complaint, I know what I got myself into. I'm just saying the simple fact is that the career is worse than it used to be because the regionals exist.
So a retired, disabled former pilot with nothing to do but fly around should board before an active, underpaid pilot from the WO who still needs to get to work to feed his family?
Anyway it's sad watching you guys get nasty with each other over a policy that both pilot groups had exactly ZERO influence to control. Any unpleasantness should be directed towards DAL management.
Anyway it's sad watching you guys get nasty with each other over a policy that both pilot groups had exactly ZERO influence to control. Any unpleasantness should be directed towards DAL management.
Super Moderator
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,868
Originally Posted by poopplop;2555758[B
]The mainline could have instead chosen to take pay and contract hits to prevent the outsourcing of their jobs in the first place.[/B] And besides, JUNIOR guys were laid off. Probationary guys were laid off. Not the senior guys with voting rights. Not the senior guys who are now happy in retirement. Again, there is no excuse. The choice was still made to sell scope, and not by regional pilots.
Dude,
You really need to learn more about the subjects that you are posting on. The DAL Pilots took a 32% pay cut exactly as you suggested above. It resulted in two things: Jack and Squat. Correction, three things, Jack and Squat and a much lower baseline from which to further lower our pay another 14%. So yes besides the 42% pay cut we took we should have took pay cuts to stop management from employing RJs.
The company went into BK anyway. They had their BK contingency plan in full force and executed it flawlessly resulting in more and larger RJs.
Did mainline pilots make mistakes when the RJ threat first appeared? Absolutely, but more out of naivety and ignorance then avarice as you suggest.
Scoop
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post