Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Buck Rogers 09-19-2019 08:10 PM


Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 2889965)
Which means management has chosen to focus on growing our subsidiary over our own. Just curious where our expansion into Chicago and Dallas is on the list.

I can answer at least the Chicago question with a refrence......go look at the UAL APC forum on advance entitlements.......we are sucking on the third, malnourished teet in ORD.....to hope for more milk is a fools errand......IMHO

Buck Rogers 09-19-2019 08:12 PM


Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 2889965)
Which means management has chosen to focus on growing our subsidiary over our own. Just curious where our expansion into Chicago and Dallas is on the list.

I can answer at least the Chicago question with a reference......go look at the UAL APC forum on advance entitlements.......we are sucking on the third, malnourished teet in ORD.....to hope for more milk is a fools errand......IMHO

Iceberg 09-20-2019 04:02 AM


Originally Posted by Buck Rogers (Post 2890182)
I can answer at least the Chicago question with a reference......go look at the UAL APC forum on advance entitlements.......we are sucking on the third, malnourished teet in ORD.....to hope for more milk is a fools errand......IMHO

The list of US cities Virgin plans to add includes Chicago. How do you explain Virgin’s ability to fly that but call it a fool’s errand for us?

DELTAFO 09-20-2019 04:53 AM


Originally Posted by Iceberg (Post 2890256)
The list of US cities Virgin plans to add includes Chicago. How do you explain Virgin’s ability to fly that but call it a fool’s errand for us?

Didn't Delta fly ORD-Europe within the past few years?

sailingfun 09-20-2019 05:24 AM


Originally Posted by DELTAFO (Post 2890272)
Didn't Delta fly ORD-Europe within the past few years?

We alternated with AirFrance ORD to CDG. We flew it in the off season with a 767 since AF did not have a suitable airframe for winter. We used AF’s slot.

gloopy 09-20-2019 06:45 AM


Originally Posted by Baradium (Post 2890137)

While its a "setback" does anyone know what the cause was? Was that door or around it redesigned in any way? That seems like one of the least likely things to be redone. So it *seems* like there was just a mistake or defect in that one part on that one plane that one time. If that's the case it would just end up being just a reasonable delay one would think.

notEnuf 09-20-2019 06:54 AM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 2890333)
While its a "setback" does anyone know what the cause was? Was that door or around it redesigned in any way? That seems like one of the least likely things to be redone. So it *seems* like there was just a mistake or defect in that one part on that one plane that one time. If that's the case it would just end up being just a reasonable delay one would think.

They have to prove the fault, find a fix and retest. If there is a flaw in that one air frame, how did it get there? Assembly flaw, design flaw, testing flaw, I'm not sure they have any answers yet.

gloopy 09-20-2019 07:02 AM


Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 2890340)
They have to prove the fault, find a fix and retest. If there is a flaw in that one air frame, how did it get there? Assembly flaw, design flaw, testing flaw, I'm not sure they have any answers yet.

Maybe not but its such a robust, quality and venerable design that something as standard as a door being a big issue suddenly doesn't add up.

Hope they get to the bottom of it.

Go Cards go 09-20-2019 07:07 AM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 2890346)
Maybe not but its such a robust, quality and venerable design that something as standard as a door being a big issue suddenly doesn't add up.

Hope they get to the bottom of it.

Hopefully it was a redesign like a bigger door or something. Otherwise Wouldn’t it just follow that this could be an issue with the cargo doors on all 777s?

sailingfun 09-20-2019 10:59 AM


Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 2890340)
They have to prove the fault, find a fix and retest. If there is a flaw in that one air frame, how did it get there? Assembly flaw, design flaw, testing flaw, I'm not sure they have any answers yet.

They actually don’t have to do that. It depends on when the door failed and what they determine was the cause. As a example the A380 wing failed testing but the failure was at something like 148% verses the required 150%. No redesign was required. I understand the door failure was at a similar percentage. It may be a very simple or even non existent fix or it could be complicated. Boeing seems to indicate it’s not a big issue.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:29 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands