Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Waves 03-30-2010 06:33 PM

To DAL330drvr: I hope you're reading this stuff about the DAL N FA's. That's all I was saying my friend. By the way, lets keep this friendly, shall we. I'm on your side, OK?

Bill Lumberg 03-30-2010 06:34 PM


Originally Posted by keenster (Post 786994)
I'm hearing that the N FAs are going to have the 767 chained to the gate with a court order because they are the only FAs that can fly with the DALn guys. Those S FAs can't fly with the N-guys. So I guess the S guys will be on those 767s.:eek:

But the DAL-N flight attendants are now trained on those planes, so they can fly them too. As long as both the pilots and flight attendants are trained on the 767, I don't see why both can't fly them.

deltabound 03-30-2010 06:39 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 786946)
FWIW, that option of a Flash Drive to store your progress is a new development. I like it. I take the CD copy it to a flash drive, and then save the position on the flash drive. Presto chango, I now have the disk on a flash drive that sits in my bag. Works well for the last year or so.

Yeah, I do that too. Of course, I'm out the outrageous expense of $7 for a flash drive (tax deductible), but I guess you can't have everything.

Sure beats spending 2 days in the schoolhouse trying not to fall asleep and spending a small fortune on food/beer in the evenings.

Waves 03-30-2010 06:44 PM


Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg (Post 787013)
But the DAL-N flight attendants are now trained on those planes, so they can fly them too. As long as both the pilots and flight attendants are trained on the 767, I don't see why both can't fly them.


Bill, it's because the DAL N FA's are refusing to fly with DAL S pilots. They are apparently saying that their contract prohibits them from flying with anyone but Northwest pilots. What I'm mainly confused about, is what exactly are they trying to accomplish with this blockade? :mad:

Tomcat 03-30-2010 06:59 PM


Originally Posted by Waves (Post 787021)
Bill, it's because the DAL N FA's are refusing to fly with DAL S pilots. They are apparently saying that their contract prohibits them from flying with anyone but Northwest pilots. What I'm mainly confused about, is what exactly are they trying to accomplish with this blockade? :mad:

That's going to be really difficult, since the only aircraft that won't have Delta-S guys is the 747-400 fleet. I'll be flying with Delta-N FA's in a week or so.....

Bill Lumberg 03-30-2010 07:06 PM


Originally Posted by Waves (Post 787021)
Bill, it's because the DAL N FA's are refusing to fly with DAL S pilots. They are apparently saying that their contract prohibits them from flying with anyone but Northwest pilots. What I'm mainly confused about, is what exactly are they trying to accomplish with this blockade? :mad:



Waves,

I understand that, but now the DAL-N pilots and flight attendants are both trained on the 767. That means, if Delta wanted to put those 767s to DAL-N bases, they could, right? If both DAL-N and DAL-S pilots and flight attendants have had the training, then both can fly that plane, at any base, including DTW and MSP. After the integration of the pilots at all of the bases, how would the DL-N flight attendants know? A DL-S pilot now based in MSP or DTW is now a MSP or DTW based DL pilot, period.

Splash 03-30-2010 07:39 PM


Originally Posted by JobHopper (Post 786973)
There's big bucks in boxes, but so far no passenger airline has figured out how to do it right.

I read complaints from pilots about the loss of the freighters. Not your post, but they are out there. If that operation was making money, why on Earth would they shut it down? Is the assumption there is a deliberate effort to lose money?

It doesn't make sense.

keenster 03-30-2010 09:00 PM


Originally Posted by Splash (Post 787042)
I read complaints from pilots about the loss of the freighters. Not your post, but they are out there. If that operation was making money, why on Earth would they shut it down? Is the assumption there is a deliberate effort to lose money?

It doesn't make sense.

Well, NWA did a good job of running the freight operation into the ground at the end and never did comit to replacing the aging 747-200 freighters. Over the years NWA made a pot full of money off of freight, but in the end they decided to let it die a slow death and the turn down in the economy did not help either. My guess is that at the time of the merger freight was loosing money and the need for new airplanes was way to much for DAL to chew on. I think that there was a missed opportunity, but it was NWA that did the missing not DAL. Sure was nice to not have to deal with pax and FAs. I miss the good old freight dog days.

Bluto 03-30-2010 09:11 PM

Is there an easy way to view the future schedule on the dalnet? I'm trying to get an idea of what the flying is going to look like out of MSP on the 88.

slowplay 03-30-2010 09:23 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 786976)
Our problem is that Air France as a small air force of cargo jets. That means they get the "big box" stuff.

I don't think that's the problem. Air France has sold 777F delivery positions and 3 aircraft that were sitting in the desert to FedEx.

Box cargo is even more dependent on cyclical economics than passengers.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:37 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands