Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

TOGA LK 04-30-2010 09:41 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 804135)
We all get paid a min guarantee. We can easily get paid half of the min guarantee on the first, then on the 15th we can get the rest of the pay plus the previous months overs/per diem.

Almost every other airline does it this way. NWA did it this way & you could still pay into or borrow from your bank.

I could be wrong but a few buds over at AA talk about a small check and then a catch up the following month. From what they say it's been like that for ages as the company made millions sitting on that money for an extra few weeks over the year.

acl65pilot 04-30-2010 09:43 AM

I have gotten used to it. It took a few months, but now all my stuff is structured in a way not to affect it.

If you want it changed, push your reps.

Superpilot92 04-30-2010 09:59 AM


Originally Posted by flyallnite (Post 804122)
Pilot Paychecks:


Pilots at Delta are paid in arrears for their services. We are paid that way because unless you are on reserve, there is no minimum guarantee. You could fly 100 hours or 0 hours, and be paid accordingly. The company can't pay you until the month is complete and payroll has calculated your earnings and deductions. You get paid that amount on the 15th, minus the flight advance, which you were paid at the end of the previous month. That is why it is called an advance... it is an advance on your monthly pay. It is a smaller amount because if you didn't fly much, you could potentially be looking at a zero or negative amount for the middle of the month, and negative amounts wreak havoc with accounting practices.

We used to have a "full service bank". With this system, you could bank up to 60 hours positive and go negative 20 hours. With this system, you could 'even out' your mid month paycheck if you were going to be short, or add more if you needed some extra smack. You could 'go negative' and in effect borrow money. Many of us "went negative" before the paycuts, because you paid back your bank at your current pay rate. As I recall, the bank hours also counted as credit and you could create mini vacations for yourself, drop trips, and do other tricks that I have long since forgotten.

If you were a new hire at Delta, while you were in indoc, you were paid as a ground employee, a normal salary. That's why when you switched to flight pay, after ground school, you had a teeny tiny paycheck, because the company had already paid you up front for your efforts in ground school, then you had a "break" while you transitioned to being paid in arrears. In other words, the company looked back at your ground school, and you had already been paid.

If we give up the flight advance, then there will be a two week period where we won't get a paycheck.

Have you ever worked at an airline that uses the standard airline pay method? You seem to be defending the current system but there are much better ways that dont cost us money.

Typically half guarantee (32-35 hours pay) on first check, second mid month check is remainder of guarantee plus overs or whatever you're owed if less than guarantee for line holders on min schedule + per diem.

Works well for every other airline in the country ;)

The current method only lets the company hold on to OUR money longer while they reap the benefits and we lose. The current pay system is a concession. I agree there are other things to fix also but why sell ourselves short?

NuGuy 04-30-2010 10:04 AM


Originally Posted by Denny Crane (Post 803970)
Fellas,

We have a lot bigger fish to fry than changing the way we get paid. IMO!:)

Denny

This is a dangerous attitude. There will ALWAYS be some kind of crisis, problem or general mayhem that either the company or the union can trott out to avoid facing and fixing problems, even small ones.

It is stuff like this, the everyday piddling stuff that irritates people the most. Everyone understands that big problems take time to fix, but letting the little ones fester is just being lazy and causes unecessary irritation.

The IP situation is a case in point. If we had the company knowingly violate parts of the training section of the contract or even was doing things that were not in the best interest of the pilots, KW and the training commitee would be screaming bloody murder instead of passing another LOA or MOU justifying and legitimizing the company's position.

Un-freakin'-believable...

Nu

80ktsClamp 04-30-2010 10:12 AM


Originally Posted by Superpilot92 (Post 804194)
Have you ever worked at an airline that uses the standard airline pay method? You seem to be defending the current system but there are much better ways that dont cost us money.

Typically half guarantee (32-35 hours pay) on first check, second mid month check is remainder of guarantee plus overs or whatever you're owed if less than guarantee for line holders on min schedule + per diem.

Works well for every other airline in the country ;)

The current method only lets the company hold on to OUR money longer while they reap the benefits and we lose. The current pay system is a concession. I agree there are other things to fix also but why sell ourselves short?

I think what he's saying is that the system that we have now is in place since there is no guarantee... You are able to drop your entire schedule through several different methods.

To me, that is such a small portion of the pilot group that it should be not based around that possibility.


Nu- so the white nights of justice and freedom would come to the rescue and tell the company how it's gonna be? :rolleyes: You're like the antithesis of Pinapple... equally out there.

1234 04-30-2010 10:29 AM


Originally Posted by flyallnite (Post 804122)
Pilot Paychecks:


Pilots at Delta are paid in arrears for their services. We are paid that way because unless you are on reserve, there is no minimum guarantee. You could fly 100 hours or 0 hours, and be paid accordingly. The company can't pay you until the month is complete and payroll has calculated your earnings and deductions. You get paid that amount on the 15th, minus the flight advance, which you were paid at the end of the previous month. That is why it is called an advance... it is an advance on your monthly pay. It is a smaller amount because if you didn't fly much, you could potentially be looking at a zero or negative amount for the middle of the month, and negative amounts wreak havoc with accounting practices.

We used to have a "full service bank". With this system, you could bank up to 60 hours positive and go negative 20 hours. With this system, you could 'even out' your mid month paycheck if you were going to be short, or add more if you needed some extra smack. You could 'go negative' and in effect borrow money. Many of us "went negative" before the paycuts, because you paid back your bank at your current pay rate. As I recall, the bank hours also counted as credit and you could create mini vacations for yourself, drop trips, and do other tricks that I have long since forgotten.

If you were a new hire at Delta, while you were in indoc, you were paid as a ground employee, a normal salary. That's why when you switched to flight pay, after ground school, you had a teeny tiny paycheck, because the company had already paid you up front for your efforts in ground school, then you had a "break" while you transitioned to being paid in arrears. In other words, the company looked back at your ground school, and you had already been paid.

If we give up the flight advance, then there will be a two week period where we won't get a paycheck.

It is not an advance. The paycheck that is received on the last day of the month is the "advance" for that month. For example, the check that was received today (April 30) is the "advance" for the month of April. The paycheck that you will receive on May 15 will make up the difference for your month of April's work. On April 30, you already completed most if not all of your work yet are only paid a very small portion of what you have already earned.

Denny Crane 04-30-2010 10:30 AM


Originally Posted by NWA320pilot (Post 803979)
Items like the way we get paid should be changed..... In my small tenure with DAL I have seen a lot of "that's how we do it at Delta". While this may be true it doesn't make it right. As one politician said it's time for a change!:D


In this instance, it doesn't make it wrong either.:) Don't get me wrong, I am all for change for the better. I just see this as six of one, half a dozen of the the other. If we can get a big enough raise, it will make this moot!:D

Denny

acl65pilot 04-30-2010 10:34 AM

Well here are a few extra production slots we can go after.....

You'd think 777 would be a lucky number. Triple lucky, even. Yet for Boeing (NYSE: BA), the jumbo jet is proving quite a headache.

Yesterday, Boeing boasted of having sold two of its new 777-300ER aircraft to Angola's national carrier, TAAG, and of having persuaded it to sign up to purchase two more 777s at a later date. But no sooner had Boeing inked the deal (worth $544 million at list price, and potentially more than $1 billion), than what do you suppose happened?

Easy come, easy go
That's right -- a cancellation of 777s. Blaming the global financial crisis for causing "substantial changes in the aviation sector" (and the housing sector ... and the banking sector ... ), El Al Israel Airlines canceled its order for four 777s, nullifying both actual and potential revenue gains from the TAAG deal. Sharing Boeing's pain will be General Electric (NYSE: GE), which builds the giant turbofans that propel the 777 through the skies.

787: two-thirds as lucky?
The mixed 777 news comes just 24 hours after Boeing announced the latest twist in its long-running (too long, if you ask the suffering-in-silence customers at Delta (NYSE: DAL) and AMR (NYSE: AMR)) 787 Dreamliner saga. Citing component shortages at unidentified suppliers, and tardy completion of engineering and design changes that Boeing had requested, the company asked manufacturers to take an extra month to finish their work on fuselage segments for two aircraft. Boeing thinks this is better than accepting delivery of the faulty sections -- and having to fix the defects itself.

Now Boeing says it's built padding into its delivery schedule to account for such delays, and will not be thrown off schedule. The planes in question being 23rd and 24th in line for assembly, I suspect that's true. These delays should not, in and of themselves, prevent Boeing from making its first 787 deliveries this year, as promised. On the other hand, if this turns out to be just the first of a series of hiccups as Boeing rushes through the construction and FAA certification process, well ...

Gambling on robots
But let's not close this article on a bum note. Rather, a note of optimism: Boeing confirmed Thursday that it has indeed begun building A160 "Hummingbird" robotic helicopters. Five aircraft will be built for testing purposes while Boeing awaits an actual order from the Pentagon. Will it materialize?

I sure hope so. It's about time some good luck came Boeing's way.

nwaf16dude 04-30-2010 10:35 AM

Less than 24 hours after I crapped on the OE planner guy he calls me up to give me two sweet TOE trips. I officially apologize.

Still, it is amazing to me that he had no idea yesterday that he was going to assign OE to me today.

tsquare 04-30-2010 10:35 AM

ACL.... 111 posts to 10,000. Are you gonna get there this weekend?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:49 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands