![]() |
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 834223)
I always loved the look of the L1011 and have to add that I prefer that livery over the current. |
Originally Posted by jiminmem
(Post 834235)
I always loved the look of the L1011 and have to add that I prefer that livery over the current.
|
Where's the L1011?
|
Looks like a Lockheed is in the back by the hangers, tough to tell. The 74 looks great in the PAA colors, to bad that name wasn't saved, talk about branding!
|
Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
(Post 834207)
Wow, Carl. I never took you for such a company guy, always trying to save them a buck. :p
I want someone in there who protects seniority. If a slot is open, seems the senior guy oughta have first crack at it. But that's just me. |
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 834105)
tsquare-
You are doing it right. Captains are supposed to be giving up legs if the FOs need landings. Most do it, but not all. Its not mandatory. FOM Section 3.2 : Recency Captains/First Officers Pilots are required by FARs to accomplish three takeoffs and landings in the previous 90-day period. Captains should discuss recency with the First Officer(s) at the beginning of the rotation and manage flight legs to ensure all pilots remain qualified. On flights requiring more than one First Officer, seat position should be determined by the need to maintain recency, not by the rotation the pilot is flying. "Culture" question - Delta has never really made any distinction about which FO was on the "relief pilot" rotation. Once you signed in, then it was always discussed about who would be relief on which legs. There would then be a gentleman's agreement based on who needed a landing. If both guys were OK on recency, then it would be a coin toss. Was that not the case at NWA? Did one guy come in knowing he was "relief pilot" for the trip? |
Originally Posted by jiminmem
(Post 834235)
I always loved the look of the L1011 and have to add that I prefer that livery over the current.
|
Originally Posted by iceman49
(Post 834251)
Looks like a Lockheed is in the back by the hangers, tough to tell. The 74 looks great in the PAA colors, to bad that name wasn't saved, talk about branding!
|
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 834189)
FTB-
?? If I'm understanding your hypothetical ?? - the answer is no. You can't go back retroactively and say that since you didn't fly you will count it as rest. If you were on call, it was not rest. Even if they never called. You can't "waive" the FARs. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 834075)
Wasn't there supposed to be some announcement re:JFK? Or will it be another 4-6 weeks of darkness?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:56 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands