![]() |
Originally Posted by iceman49
(Post 834251)
Looks like a Lockheed is in the back by the hangers, tough to tell. The 74 looks great in the PAA colors, to bad that name wasn't saved, talk about branding!
|
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 833893)
That may be your point, but could you answer my point please? For review, my point was that guys were asking me for detail after detail and still didn't believe it after I posted the detail. Clamp posts something with no reference other than "and I quote" and nobody questions it. Then people actually reference the post as if it was fact. You were one of them.
Do you really see no double standard there? The double standard is my point. Carl I would not call it a double standard. What I call it is a bunch of guys getting absolutely miffed at the words used. Like I have tried to say it is the approach. I will not post the details of what went down on here because simply put it does not need to be here. I will state that if either side of an argument uses the nuclear option nothing ends well. It gets blown up, shows up here and people stop listen and continue to talk/type with anger that elevates to the levels it did. This all results in guys calling you and others bed wetters, and you throwing around comments as well. What does it solve? Nada. You are irked, people are gunning for you and the dialogue ends up in the non-constructive category. Do I call that a double standard? Nope, I call that a discussion that went emotional. I am glad that you did not name names. If you did, they would have been deleted, and it would have involved a few people getting to play a carpet dance. Was what they said correct? Nope, it just elevated the emotional response. Carl, you are a smart guy, there are many on here that know how to licit a given response from certain individuals by going after them, but not flaming them and getting a reminder. (fine line) The crux of this issue that we are tiptoeing around is a philosophical difference in how we run crew rest and PIC assignments. One you can deal with, the other is totally in the hands of Flight Ops Leadership. No one on here has the authority to change it, and the only way to change it is to make a very compelling case as to why they should even consider it. Stating how it is not giving a position. In closing, argue the facts, all of us, quit the divisiveness, and for God's sake quit name calling. |
Originally Posted by DAL4EVER
(Post 833931)
In the few times I did JFK with the closure, it actually ran smoother than when 31L was open. I bet now that they added 25% to their runway capacity, they figure out how to increase delays by 40% again. That said, I won't know what to do when going down a smooth 31L.
Have that three hr flow chart handy.......:eek: |
Originally Posted by nwaf16dude
(Post 833958)
T, it may not be a written policy, but what Carl is saying is the way I was taught during my two TOE's last month with south LCA's. It wouldn't be the only "technique" that was briefed in a way that made it sound like a "procedure." I don't have a lot of complaints about my training, but I did hear a lot of "this is the way we do it" for things that aren't written down anywhere. I like being given techniques, but they should be presented as such and not briefed as procedure.
|
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 834289)
Many things that are termed "Best Practice" here at DAL somehow feel like procedures. They are technique. Look at the FOM and see how it defines crew rest. It is vague for a reason. The only thing that is directive is the PIC requirement. Even that can change with dispatcher approval. Go read the FOM and report back.
|
Originally Posted by firstmob
(Post 834280)
The announcement ref the JFK terminal upgrades is becoming as big a joke as the JFK terminal.
|
Originally Posted by DAL73n
(Post 834294)
As an F/O, I've flown with Captains that do some things a little different and it is my job to run the airplane how he wants - as long as he's within the rules.
|
It is in there. We are a Capt's airline! :D
|
Originally Posted by satchip
(Post 834233)
I don't know where this every two hours stuff is coming from. Can't speak for the 777 but on the ER for over 12 hr legs the breaks usually go long/long or short/long/short. The crew discusses it comes up with a consensus before takeoff.
I think there should be only 1 pic, unity of command you know. The idea of splitting up the leg I think is terrible. Jmho. Also it sounds like I never want to e based in Atlanta. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 834295)
Well, tell the guys giving the briefings in the crew rooms to quit spewing dates.
"Hey, lets all strongly hint we'll make the JFK announcement on June 29th, and watch them go nuts on APC forums when it doesn't happen. Then we'll make the announcement next morning." |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:59 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands