Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-2010 | 09:50 AM
  #42161  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cycle Pilot
Nope. I'm just catchin' a ride so it's not my place. I've been really tempted, though. Now if I were the F.O. on the flight, I'd definitely be saying something.
I am a FNWA 320 FO and I agree with you. Way too many captains I fly with want both engines started right away after push and leave them running all the way to the gate after landing....even in busy airports like ATL, ORD, JFK and LGA. I am always prompting them to see if they want me to shut one down after landing. Some take the hint....some don't. Many act like as if the 320 is a wide-body...they believe it takes two engines to taxi that thing and are afraid of higher jet blast from single engine taxi. (I don't think a 320 has ever blown over anything bigger than a bag cart in history). We have to spread the culture of single engine taxi across the board.

Sure....I want to ask for a big fat payraise (at least restore what we lost) in the next contract. One the same hand, I want to do the best to save the company money from the aircraft operations side (without compromising safety of course).
Old 06-30-2010 | 10:01 AM
  #42162  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
From: Permanently scarred
Default

Waiting for all this talk to get to the point about how fNWA got screwed when Pepsi was replaced with Coke.
Old 06-30-2010 | 10:02 AM
  #42163  
TenYearsGone's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,039
Likes: 0
From: 7ERB
Default

Originally Posted by GunshipGuy
Waiting for all this talk to get to the point about how fNWA got screwed when Pepsi was replaced with Coke.
I hate Pepsi!
Old 06-30-2010 | 10:03 AM
  #42164  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by GunshipGuy
Waiting for all this talk to get to the point about how fNWA got screwed when Pepsi was replaced with Coke.
You mean, something red replaced something blue?

BLASHPEM... BLASPH... give me a moment...
Old 06-30-2010 | 10:05 AM
  #42165  
Superpilot92's Avatar
Underboob King
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Commander
Default

Originally Posted by freightguy
I am a FNWA 320 FO and I agree with you. Way too many captains I fly with want both engines started right away after push and leave them running all the way to the gate after landing....even in busy airports like ATL, ORD, JFK and LGA. I am always prompting them to see if they want me to shut one down after landing. Some take the hint....some don't. Many act like as if the 320 is a wide-body...they believe it takes two engines to taxi that thing and are afraid of higher jet blast from single engine taxi. (I don't think a 320 has ever blown over anything bigger than a bag cart in history). We have to spread the culture of single engine taxi across the board.

Sure....I want to ask for a big fat payraise (at least restore what we lost) in the next contract. One the same hand, I want to do the best to save the company money from the aircraft operations side (without compromising safety of course).
I agree, i always ask the captain if he wants to single engine taxi. some do and some act like its against company policy. this really should be pushed a little harder as theres no reason why we 2 engine taxi as much as we do. Obviously its necessary sometimes to keep both running but it we should single engine taxi more often.
Old 06-30-2010 | 10:06 AM
  #42166  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
From: 717
Default

Originally Posted by Cycle Pilot
Nope. I'm just catchin' a ride so it's not my place. I've been really tempted, though. Now if I were the F.O. on the flight, I'd definitely be saying something.
And what would you be saying to staighten the captain out?
Old 06-30-2010 | 10:07 AM
  #42167  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
From: Permanently scarred
Default Legal?

Want to run this by guys in the know. With the new reserve schedule allowing more days on reserve what do you think about this scenario:

Reserve pilot has a schedule with 8 days straight before an X day. Starts off with long call for 3 days; no call from scheduling saying he's getting a break from LC. Then on day 4 he starts a 4-day trip that includes a 30-hr layover between day 2 and 3. Is this legal?
Old 06-30-2010 | 10:09 AM
  #42168  
Cycle Pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
From: DAL Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by freightguy
I am a FNWA 320 FO and I agree with you. Way too many captains I fly with want both engines started right away after push and leave them running all the way to the gate after landing....even in busy airports like ATL, ORD, JFK and LGA. I am always prompting them to see if they want me to shut one down after landing. Some take the hint....some don't. Many act like as if the 320 is a wide-body...they believe it takes two engines to taxi that thing and are afraid of higher jet blast from single engine taxi. (I don't think a 320 has ever blown over anything bigger than a bag cart in history). We have to spread the culture of single engine taxi across the board.

Sure....I want to ask for a big fat payraise (at least restore what we lost) in the next contract. One the same hand, I want to do the best to save the company money from the aircraft operations side (without compromising safety of course).
What's funny is that with both engines running on the bus, the Captain always seems like he's riding the brakes to keep the plane from taxiing too quickly. I've never single engine taxied an Airbus before, but it seems like it'd be pretty easy to do. Probably easier than the -88!
Old 06-30-2010 | 10:09 AM
  #42169  
Cycle Pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
From: DAL Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by GunshipGuy
Want to run this by guys in the know. With the new reserve schedule allowing more days on reserve what do you think about this scenario:

Reserve pilot has a schedule with 8 days straight before an X day. Starts off with long call for 3 days; no call from scheduling saying he's getting a break from LC. Then on day 4 he starts a 4-day trip that includes a 30-hr layover between day 2 and 3. Is this legal?
Yep, it's legal. You can get your 24 hours at a layover.
Old 06-30-2010 | 10:32 AM
  #42170  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cycle Pilot
What's funny is that with both engines running on the bus, the Captain always seems like he's riding the brakes to keep the plane from taxiing too quickly. I've never single engine taxied an Airbus before, but it seems like it'd be pretty easy to do. Probably easier than the -88!
You're right bro....I witness it all the time....riding the brakes and heating up the brakes! Shut the damn engine down!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices