Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
There is nothing RAH is doing that is any threat via outsourcing, codesharing or anything else over and above what is allowed within the DL/UAL/APA/etc PWA's, and I don't think there is a legacy/major PWA that would permit such schenanegans in any form, regardless of a given regional union's affiliation.
They aren't supposed to be flying any airplanes over 76 seats whether those flights carry the Delta code or not.
Lee Moak (and the ALPA National lawyers) have refused to file a grievance on that issue. They say its not prohibited flying because Republic is not an "air carrier". It is a "holding company" and the divisions have separate operating certificates.
I say bull****.
The letter, spirit and intent of the Delta scope clause is being violated but the boys in Herndon do not want to go there.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
I sure would like to see that definition of "air carrier" tested though.
Republic is one.
Last edited by Check Essential; 09-17-2010 at 05:57 AM.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Exactly. I thought ALPA/DALPA closed the childish "separate certificate trick" loophole on the last contract. Why wouldn't the DMEC challenge this. There is NOTHING to lose since its being done anyway, and I don't understand why DL management wants to fund a competitor when they aren't even that valueable of a provider anyway (that flying could go anywhere just as cheaply).
Hey Carl,
If you want my vote, I'm going to just want a good old fashioned bribe, in that international currency..................beer
IE How many of these "coins" for beer in this country?
If you want my vote, I'm going to just want a good old fashioned bribe, in that international currency..................beer

IE How many of these "coins" for beer in this country?
Exactly. I thought ALPA/DALPA closed the childish "separate certificate trick" loophole on the last contract. Why wouldn't the DMEC challenge this. There is NOTHING to lose since its being done anyway, and I don't understand why DL management wants to fund a competitor when they aren't even that valueable of a provider anyway (that flying could go anywhere just as cheaply).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




