Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-23-2010 | 06:43 AM
  #48291  
beer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Default

Just read Moak's letter.....I have not kept up with the lawsuit, but I hope we are bringing the thunder down on the Gov't!!! This is ridiculous!!!
Old 09-23-2010 | 06:49 AM
  #48292  
dragon's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
From: Dismayed
Default

Parts of the letter are already in the press. Interestingly, they didn't mention any of the legal issues, only pay.

Delta Pilot Leader Cites Pay Gains - TheStreet
Old 09-23-2010 | 06:54 AM
  #48293  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Go read your Chairman's Letter. Looks to me like treats in the future are being noticed today.
I just did. I have no idea what "treats" you got out of that... it looked like a lot of gloom and doom to me... unless you work for United.
Old 09-23-2010 | 07:04 AM
  #48294  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
We need to think about that.
Bringing "constructive engagement" to the national level is a big departure from the traditional form of labor relations in this country. The problem is that it relies so heavily on management being a good faith partner.
Wave of the future or lambs to the slaughter?

I do not equate "constructive engagement" to bending over. I take it as a dialogue between two parties that is two way and is rational. Rational does not mean accepting less, but it does mean being realistic and not irrational for the sake thereof.

Engaging does not mean compromising or to settle. It means to look at multiple paths to an end goal that all pilots desire. It means hearing the other side (management etc) out and then fact checking their position. To me it is amazing what happens when one just listens even if they know the position is totally wrong!

We can say that about restoration, work rules, retirement, lobbying that benefits our labor group etc.

What constructive engagement does is allows us the option to opt out at any given time. The void of this engagement will not go unnoticed. It forces both sides to be rational in their approach because both sides will be harmed in the end without it.

FWIW, this is not support of a person or candidate, this is support of the idea.
Old 09-23-2010 | 07:08 AM
  #48295  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
I just did. I have no idea what "treats" you got out of that... it looked like a lot of gloom and doom to me... unless you work for United.
What I was specifically referring to is that 1) We are as labor calling out a labor friendly administration on something that will no doubt cost growth and opportunities for you and I at this corporation. 2) That this administration is identifying and communicating threats to our jobs. Not threats of just present day, but actions that will effect us as we morph in to a society that allows foreign ownership of our airlines.
Old 09-23-2010 | 07:15 AM
  #48296  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
Well, yes... but feel free to refute it if you have numbers. Overall RJ numbers are way down, and the big RJ numbers are capped. Are you disputing that?
Hopefully, someone knows how to dig up the numbers on that. It should be relatively easy to find DCI block hours, number of aircraft, number of pilots, etc. prior to the date Lee Moak took office and compare it with those same numbers today. I honestly don't know where to find that data.

All I know is I have seen a massive explosion in the number of RJ's on the ramps, expansion in the number of gates they occupy, and the replacement of city pairs that used to be exclusively or almost exclusively served by mainline and are now exclusively or almost exclusively served by RJ's.

Maybe my eyes are deceiving me, but the numbers should tell the story. You just have to make sure you are using numbers that tell the whole story, not just part of it.
Old 09-23-2010 | 07:17 AM
  #48297  
nwaf16dude's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
From: 737A
Default

Old 09-23-2010 | 07:20 AM
  #48298  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
What I was specifically referring to is that 1) We are as labor calling out a labor friendly administration on something that will no doubt cost growth and opportunities for you and I at this corporation. 2) That this administration is identifying and communicating threats to our jobs. Not threats of just present day, but actions that will effect us as we morph in to a society that allows foreign ownership of our airlines.
That is all very sweet.. and I appreciate that LM has the stones to stand up and write about this. But again I will ask.. .WHERE IS PRATER IN ALL THIS?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? Oh, that's right, he has a clear conflict of interest. Hmmmmm interesting that that is only identifyable when it is an issue that comes between 2 legacy carriers. I still don't see any "treats" though.
Old 09-23-2010 | 07:20 AM
  #48299  
nwaf16dude's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
From: 737A
Default

Great non-rev experience, managed biz class both ways, epic good time in Munich. Had to fly in to Stuttgart, plus a 2 hour train ride, but the price was right.

Old 09-23-2010 | 07:21 AM
  #48300  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
Hopefully, someone knows how to dig up the numbers on that. It should be relatively easy to find DCI block hours, number of aircraft, number of pilots, etc. prior to the date Lee Moak took office and compare it with those same numbers today. I honestly don't know where to find that data.

All I know is I have seen a massive explosion in the number of RJ's on the ramps, expansion in the number of gates they occupy, and the replacement of city pairs that used to be exclusively or almost exclusively served by mainline and are now exclusively or almost exclusively served by RJ's.

Maybe my eyes are deceiving me, but the numbers should tell the story. You just have to make sure you are using numbers that tell the whole story, not just part of it.

The number of hulls is decreased. Delta publishes those number under the Marketing section of DALnet.

ASM's has gone up in the short term, but will be going down now as they cannot replace 50 seat jets for 76 seat jets.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices