Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search
Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2009, 11:28 AM
  #4831  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
Quite true. Notice how calm the ALPA board is.
I am glad to see some senior people taking issue with the issues of today.
I've pretty much punted the DALPA board since it is slower than molassas, and frankly it is quite boring anymore.
tsquare is offline  
Old 02-16-2009, 11:48 AM
  #4832  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 21
Question

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
No the initial three will come from Boeing Finance lease corp. The other 25 or so will come from China!
Should I start studying chinese?
vicpilot is offline  
Old 02-16-2009, 12:07 PM
  #4833  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Imapilot2 View Post
It matters to all points. Once the flying is given away it is gone for good. The more large rjs the less for Delta Pilots. No matter how you slice it.
As Bar said on the other thread, the problem is scope is being used as a bargaining chip by DALPA.

I think we all fear getting airplanes that can be parked in exchange for DAL getting airplanes we'll never fly.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 02-16-2009, 12:15 PM
  #4834  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Imapilot2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Captain Jack
Posts: 1,003
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
As Bar said on the other thread, the problem is scope is being used as a bargaining chip by DALPA.

I think we all fear getting airplanes that can be parked in exchange for DAL getting airplanes we'll never fly.
I wish I had a union that understood that and cared about what this place will be like 30 years from now. Instead of too worried about just tomorrow. Puff up their chests and give themselves pats on the back and say "look how great we just did at securing your job with a no furlough clause" "you can thank me later" "all we had to do is allow more outsourcing and voila!" I would rather be furloughed than see one more large rj. If all the pilots before me stood so loosely on our flying I wouldn't have the job I have today. I am afraid all of this carving up of the farm and selling of its pieces for the short term will leave our children just hearing stories of what was once called main line.

Last edited by Imapilot2; 02-16-2009 at 12:40 PM.
Imapilot2 is offline  
Old 02-16-2009, 12:33 PM
  #4835  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rhino Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 73N CA
Posts: 474
Default

Can somebody give a synopsis of NWA LOA 2006-10, 2006-14. I can't find it and need a little help. Details please! What's the current DAL MEC stance on this issue? Sorry if it's buried in the thread and I missed it.
Rhino Driver is offline  
Old 02-16-2009, 12:53 PM
  #4836  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DelDah Capt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 514
Default

Originally Posted by groundstop View Post
DAL is getting 3 MD-90's in March

Source: MAT crew room white board
Unfortunately, the other news posted on the MAT bulletin board was the fact that RJs are starting on the BOS/LGA legs during the weekends. That's the way things started on the DCA/LGA side before it eventually went all RJs.

While I'm happy to see the MD90s, it's aggravating to see more 76 seat RJ flying on former mainline routes.....but heck, we let the company have them, I guess they have to put them somewhere.

Lastly, it's a shame to see how badly the company has screwed up the Shuttle. At one time it was a premium product and a cash cow. Ever since they moved control of the Shuttle from New York down to ATL, it's been downhill.
DelDah Capt is offline  
Old 02-16-2009, 01:05 PM
  #4837  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
If this turns out to be true... is it coincidental that the 90s became firm right after the 76 seat settlement?

Its highly unlikely that this is a coincidence. Please read the agreement. If the company knew for sure it was getting the 90's they would not have agreed to the settlement. If we take on the number of 90's being mentioned the company will be in compliance with the contract regardless of who's numbers you used. In fact without the settlement if the company had pressed on using their numbers they would have been allowed even more 76 seat airframes. With the settlement they have to use our numbers when the bring new aircraft onboard.

One more thing. They have tried on 5 different occasions to close a deal with the Chinese. Every time we think we have a deal the Chinese change the deal. It is rumored we are very close again to a deal but so far we are 0 for 5. Lets hope this time it goes through. The numbers if we do the ninety deal are rumored to be a minimum of 20 airframes and up to 40. The initial purchase may be a smaller number but there will be a follow on buy. Delta wants a minimum fleet of 36 if they do this.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 02-16-2009, 01:43 PM
  #4838  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 77
Default

will the 90's be fleet growth or will they get rid of older 88's at the same time. I know what I am betting
fishguy79 is offline  
Old 02-16-2009, 01:48 PM
  #4839  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jughead's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: ATL717A
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare View Post
I've pretty much punted the DALPA board since it is slower than molassas, and frankly it is quite boring anymore.
My thoughts exactly...boring, slow, unfamiliar names, hard to navigate, just don't feel like figuring out the nuiances. Guess I'll hang here from now on.
Jughead is offline  
Old 02-16-2009, 02:30 PM
  #4840  
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
RockyBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,598
Default

Originally Posted by Rhino Driver View Post
Can somebody give a synopsis of NWA LOA 2006-10, 2006-14. I can't find it and need a little help. Details please! What's the current DAL MEC stance on this issue? Sorry if it's buried in the thread and I missed it.
It's on the ALPA site under the JCBA attachements. Basically it says that if Delta furloughs pilots then furloughed pilots are entitled to vacancies at the DCI carriers if they get ADDITIONAL jets larger than 51 seats after we furlough. If it is a wholly owned carrier we get 100% of the Captain and FO vacancies. If it is not a wholly owned carrier, but leases jets from Delta, then we get 50% of the Captain and FO vacancies. So we would have the flowback to Compass, all the slots at Comair and Mesaba, 50% of the slots at ASA, SkyWest, Shuttle America, Pinnacle, and Mesa. This LOA was signed by NWA and only applied to Pinnacle and Mesaba when signed. It was incorporated into the JCBA with no changes so the way it reads, it now applies to all affiliate carriers of Delta. I guess the RJDC has a deal with ALPA national and they are saying it doesn't apply to Comair and ASA.
RockyBoy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices