Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
So I log in, I see lots of hot babes so I feel it's my duty as a member of the Deltas L&G late night crew, to post something worthy.
Something I think we can appreciate and maybe get some satisfaction from,
YouTube - Satisfaction - Power Tool Girls
Something I think we can appreciate and maybe get some satisfaction from,
YouTube - Satisfaction - Power Tool Girls
Was that subliminal?
I do need a new hammer drill.
So I log in, I see lots of hot babes so I feel it's my duty as a member of the Deltas L&G late night crew, to post something worthy.
Something I think we can appreciate and maybe get some satisfaction from,
YouTube - Satisfaction - Power Tool Girls
Something I think we can appreciate and maybe get some satisfaction from,
YouTube - Satisfaction - Power Tool Girls
Great!
Now I have my Christmas "wish list", thanks Super !
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
Very interesting exchange with GB over the airline industry and the Colgan crash with PBS, for most of you, you'll really like GB even more:
FRONTLINE: flying cheap: interviews: gordon bethune | PBS
Really? You think $16,000 a year as a starting salary for a first officer is enough?
Can I tell you how they get to that, just so that the public knows? Every three or four years, there's contract negotiations between labor groups and the company. The company says: "We can afford to pay this much money. This is total dollars. How would you like to allocate it?" The union who's negotiating on behalf of its members allocates that money in a way that can get ratified by the vote of the pilots. You know who's not there? The people you haven't hired yet. You know who always gets left, because the captain wants $2 more? And everybody says, "Well, you know, my first year we didn't get paid anything either, so tough **** for them." ... The reason it's $16,000 a year is because that union wanted that money somewhere else, and that's the way it works.
It's the union's fault.
Well, you only get so much money. How much would you like to allocate? Would you like to have every pilot get $2 less than ours so we could pay the first-year people this much, or would you rather have the $2 an hour in your paycheck and let the first-year people go probationary as they are, like every other, and you were? And that's what they elect to do. ...
I think he makes some noteworthy points about management's role in during contract negotiations. From what I've understood at DAL, back in the day this was how compensation packages were negotiated. Management would throw a lump of money at the pilot group and the leadership would decide how to divvy it up amongst the pilot group.
What I like about this is that management isn't telling is HOW to pay pilots. I've always thought that we should negotiate a lump sum of money without justification of pay scales. Basically, the union should decide what each specific seat in each aircraft category should pay, then calculate that total amount required to provide that compensation package.
The lump figure is what our union should be negotiating for. The more variables introduced complicates the process while becoming divisive to the pilot group.
Not sure if this is the method used or not, but either way we cannot continue to send crap down the river because long term it only hurts contract negotiations.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
From: C47 PIC/747-400 SIC
tried to find the DC9 thread that was on here a while back but no luck,so i figured I would just throw this out into this sprawling monstrosity of a thread, I am now a practicing member of the DC9 tribe,did my bounces in a series -15,freightdog version,I feel the love,makes me smile every time i see a Delta -50.
I know this is a few pages back but,
I think he makes some noteworthy points about management's role in during contract negotiations. From what I've understood at DAL, back in the day this was how compensation packages were negotiated. Management would throw a lump of money at the pilot group and the leadership would decide how to divvy it up amongst the pilot group.
What I like about this is that management isn't telling is HOW to pay pilots. I've always thought that we should negotiate a lump sum of money without justification of pay scales. Basically, the union should decide what each specific seat in each aircraft category should pay, then calculate that total amount required to provide that compensation package.
The lump figure is what our union should be negotiating for. The more variables introduced complicates the process while becoming divisive to the pilot group.
Not sure if this is the method used or not, but either way we cannot continue to send crap down the river because long term it only hurts contract negotiations.
I think he makes some noteworthy points about management's role in during contract negotiations. From what I've understood at DAL, back in the day this was how compensation packages were negotiated. Management would throw a lump of money at the pilot group and the leadership would decide how to divvy it up amongst the pilot group.
What I like about this is that management isn't telling is HOW to pay pilots. I've always thought that we should negotiate a lump sum of money without justification of pay scales. Basically, the union should decide what each specific seat in each aircraft category should pay, then calculate that total amount required to provide that compensation package.
The lump figure is what our union should be negotiating for. The more variables introduced complicates the process while becoming divisive to the pilot group.
Not sure if this is the method used or not, but either way we cannot continue to send crap down the river because long term it only hurts contract negotiations.
There is good and bad to this type of negotiation. Positive is you know the value of the contract up front, the negative is you can be killed by a thousand paper cuts.
It is IBB style where the total value is determined but we get killed on the costing of each item. I would be careful about what you wish for. The corporation love this style because the work takes place on the other side of the table and they can then just argue that the cost assigned to each item it not correct.
Just noticed Mr. Anderson serves as a Board Member for the Federal Reserve Bank in addition to everything else he does.
The man really impresses me. Not only for his competency in our CEO job, but that he's also humble and respectful. Had him on board a few weeks ago. He boarded with other passengers, greeted the crew, took a seat in the back.
Hope Delta gets to keep him for many years to come.
The man really impresses me. Not only for his competency in our CEO job, but that he's also humble and respectful. Had him on board a few weeks ago. He boarded with other passengers, greeted the crew, took a seat in the back.
Hope Delta gets to keep him for many years to come.
It is always nice to see someone enjoy their job and the challenges that go with it. It took a 75% pay cut to come here to do what he loves. I know to pilots that will irk some but it is true.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
Just noticed Mr. Anderson serves as a Board Member for the Federal Reserve Bank in addition to everything else he does.
The man really impresses me. Not only for his competency in our CEO job, but that he's also humble and respectful. Had him on board a few weeks ago. He boarded with other passengers, greeted the crew, took a seat in the back.
Hope Delta gets to keep him for many years to come.
The man really impresses me. Not only for his competency in our CEO job, but that he's also humble and respectful. Had him on board a few weeks ago. He boarded with other passengers, greeted the crew, took a seat in the back.
Hope Delta gets to keep him for many years to come.
Kind of impressive to see how important it is to him to see our flight depart on time, to the minute, while also keeping the first class seats reserved for our customers.
He always flies in coach. Never in first.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
There is good and bad to this type of negotiation. Positive is you know the value of the contract up front, the negative is you can be killed by a thousand paper cuts.
It is IBB style where the total value is determined but we get killed on the costing of each item. I would be careful about what you wish for. The corporation love this style because the work takes place on the other side of the table and they can then just argue that the cost assigned to each item it not correct.
It is IBB style where the total value is determined but we get killed on the costing of each item. I would be careful about what you wish for. The corporation love this style because the work takes place on the other side of the table and they can then just argue that the cost assigned to each item it not correct.
Personally, I think management will try to rationalize their position with truckloads of data that very convincingly defends their point of view on why something cannot be afforded. That is a slippery slope to start getting involved with, and I think it is imperative not overstep either sides area of authority/responsibility.
While, I agree, and uncaring, not-my-problem kind of attitude is not the best angle, I also think a easy-going, overaly-amicable approach can be equally as inefficient.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




