![]() |
Originally Posted by Mem9guy
(Post 922697)
Since pay has been discussed here lately, I just wanted to dig this one up and throw it out again to see what people think...
|
Originally Posted by Mem9guy
(Post 922697)
Since pay has been discussed here lately, I just wanted to dig this one up and throw it out again to see what people think...
Flew with a check-airman. He told me more ERs coming out of the desert, thus more hiring. Also, company is researching the viability (it looks great and almost a sure thing) to standardize the cockpit of the 7er and 767-400. Thus creating ONE category. TYG |
Originally Posted by Columbia
(Post 922713)
Sounds interesting, but wouldn't folks already on the 737/767/747 complain that their pay rates didn't go up nearly as much as the others brought up?
As I like to remind my kids, "fair and equal are not the same thing." The main thing that I see is that if we don't adress the change in retirement methods from "final average earnings" to "time value of money," we are making the career earnings of everyone future or junior worth less. If we flatten out the career pay curve a little bit, we increase the value of a Delta Pilot's career without needing a "bigger piece of pie" from the company. |
Originally Posted by Mem9guy
(Post 922697)
Since pay has been discussed here lately, I just wanted to dig this one up and throw it out again to see what people think...
|
Originally Posted by Mem9guy
(Post 922697)
Since pay has been discussed here lately, I just wanted to dig this one up and throw it out again to see what people think...
The idea that the company would save in training costs is, I think, vastly overblown. I doubt that too many guys make the smaller seat changes for money. My guess would be that basing, schedules, and seniority in category plays a much larger role.
Originally Posted by Mem9guy
(Post 922720)
As I like to remind my kids, "fair and equal are not the same thing."
|
Originally Posted by CVG767A
(Post 922666)
Are those numbers accurate? I thought we were closer to 600 hours.
|
Originally Posted by CVG767A
(Post 922730)
The idea that the company would save in training costs is, I think, vastly overblown. I doubt that too many guys make the smaller seat changes for money. My guess would be that basing, schedules, and seniority in category plays a much larger role.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 922678)
I am not asserting that our contract is as good as SWA contract either. To accept the current SWA contract as our next contract is however not going to be nearly enough for me to vote yes. If we offered the SWA contract to management I would bet they would jump on it and except instantly. I am however asserting that the differences between the contracts are not nearly as great when you look at all items. I expect at a very minimum SWA payrates plus a few percent and to keep the good things we have in our contract like the 14% retirement contribution. In fact I expect that number to go up into the 16 to 18 Percent range not remain at 14. Offer Delta management the SWA contract and they will have a party over in the GO that will last for weeks!!!
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 922735)
I think 800 hours is the current DAL pilot yearly average. Pre BK it was 600 hours.
|
Originally Posted by tenyearsgone
(Post 922714)
fyi,
flew with a check-airman. he told me more ers coming out of the desert, thus more hiring. also, company is researching the viability (it looks great and almost a sure thing) to standardize the cockpit of the 7er and 767-400. Thus creating one category. Tyg |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:04 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands