Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

DeadHead 05-02-2011 04:47 AM

http://a57.foxnews.com/static/manage...tyPerry640.jpg

In the words of that piece of garbage after 9-11...."We were Rejoiced"

God Bless America!

tsquare 05-02-2011 05:10 AM


Originally Posted by Rather B Fishin (Post 987956)
Unfortunately I cannot attend the 66 meeting. Your post seems a little counter intuitive. Are you concerned about reserve staffing hence more pilots or are you concerned about greenslipping which promotes more overtime = less pilots?????

OK... assuming that the manning formula is not a static document:

1) A pilot wants to drop a trip but cannot because of capped reserve days.
2) Pilot puts the trip on the swap board, where it sits..
3) Pilot from another base swoops in and picks up the trip

Repercussions of this exchange:

Because the trip was covered by a different base, it would not go down on the liability side of that bases' ledger to use an accounting motif. When the numbers are crunched, they will see that fewer reserve pilots are required since the trips are being covered. IOW, all that has been done in effect is to shift that flying to another base. I am sure that we are only talking about a little amount of time, but what boils my shrimp is that this proposal does nothing to alleviate the reserve manning issue. WE.. the pilots... help out the issue by allowing trips to be covered by other bases, and skeds has not to get it's hands dirty in the process. If this is to be allowed, we need to bring back true yellow slips without all the days of availability garbage and let a reserve pilot pick up a trip that is either in open time or on the swap board.. within his base.... first.. before any cherry pickers from outside. Then, I might be interested. Until then, the out of base WS/GS process is working fine. This issue here is the reserve system. This does nada to fix it and is little more than diversion from that.

Elliot 05-02-2011 05:12 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 988041)
So I was taking off the other day in a mighty 88, I hit 400' and rolled into a bank but it took 2-3 seconds before the airplane responded. So out of curiosity, what's the delay for you guys controlling a UAV over Pakistan from Vegas (?) and is it quicker than the time it takes a 88 to respond to an input made from inside the plane when at high pitch? :D

Good question. There is in fact a delay between control input and effect. Not necessarily from what a person might believe though, due to the geographical distance of the machine from the operator. (Physically speaking of course, mental distance could be even greater.):D

The majority of time delay comes from the control station talking satellite speak, the satellite talking to the airplane, and then the airplane having to decipher the satellite speak and turn it into mechanical control input.

Less than your 3 second delay control input to control effect in the 88 at high pitch attitudes though. :cool:

GJ

FlyingSig 05-02-2011 06:09 AM


Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 988125)
OK... assuming that the manning formula is not a static document:

1) A pilot wants to drop a trip but cannot because of capped reserve days.
2) Pilot puts the trip on the swap board, where it sits..
3) Pilot from another base swoops in and picks up the trip

Repercussions of this exchange:

Because the trip was covered by a different base, it would not go down on the liability side of that bases' ledger to use an accounting motif. When the numbers are crunched, they will see that fewer reserve pilots are required since the trips are being covered. IOW, all that has been done in effect is to shift that flying to another base. I am sure that we are only talking about a little amount of time, but what boils my shrimp is that this proposal does nothing to alleviate the reserve manning issue. WE.. the pilots... help out the issue by allowing trips to be covered by other bases, and skeds has not to get it's hands dirty in the process. If this is to be allowed, we need to bring back true yellow slips without all the days of availability garbage and let a reserve pilot pick up a trip that is either in open time or on the swap board.. within his base.... first.. before any cherry pickers from outside. Then, I might be interested. Until then, the out of base WS/GS process is working fine. This issue here is the reserve system. This does nada to fix it and is little more than diversion from that.

The trip wasn't covered by another base. The trip was owned by a pilot who then chose to give it up. There will be no "numbers crunching" when it comes to this trip in regards to staffing because it started out as a covered trip, the company never got involved with covering the trip, and the trip was flown without a hitch. One pilot was able to get rid of his trip that he didn't want to fly and another pilot was able to pick up more time without regard to the ALV+15. The flying didn't shift bases. It's still the same trip out of the same base. Just because one guy in one seat may be from a different base, he's in that base for that trip.

CVG767A 05-02-2011 06:20 AM


Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 988125)
OK... assuming that the manning formula is not a static document:

1) A pilot wants to drop a trip but cannot because of capped reserve days.
2) Pilot puts the trip on the swap board, where it sits..
3) Pilot from another base swoops in and picks up the trip

Repercussions of this exchange:

Because the trip was covered by a different base, it would not go down on the liability side of that bases' ledger to use an accounting motif. When the numbers are crunched, they will see that fewer reserve pilots are required since the trips are being covered. IOW, all that has been done in effect is to shift that flying to another base. I am sure that we are only talking about a little amount of time, but what boils my shrimp is that this proposal does nothing to alleviate the reserve manning issue. WE.. the pilots... help out the issue by allowing trips to be covered by other bases, and skeds has not to get it's hands dirty in the process. If this is to be allowed, we need to bring back true yellow slips without all the days of availability garbage and let a reserve pilot pick up a trip that is either in open time or on the swap board.. within his base.... first.. before any cherry pickers from outside. Then, I might be interested. Until then, the out of base WS/GS process is working fine. This issue here is the reserve system. This does nada to fix it and is little more than diversion from that.

I don't see how it creates any sort of liability in any base. If an ATL guy takes my Kiev trip, and I take his Munich trip, both trips are covered, and no time has shifted between bases. As far as denying good trips to more junior pilots in the same base, I don't think that the senior guys would be dumping their good trips in the absence of a desirable swap.

Does our reserve system need fixing? Probably. Do out-of-base trip swaps have any impact on a pilot on reserve? I don't think so--

Scoop 05-02-2011 06:44 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 988028)
God I love our soldiers!!!!!

Carl


Yep - are Soldiers are the best. But lets not forget our Sailors, as in Navy SEALs! :D

Scoop

forgot to bid 05-02-2011 06:44 AM

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net..._3132343_n.jpg

tsquare 05-02-2011 06:48 AM


Originally Posted by FlyingSig (Post 988140)
The trip wasn't covered by another base. The trip was owned by a pilot who then chose to give it up. There will be no "numbers crunching" when it comes to this trip in regards to staffing because it started out as a covered trip, the company never got involved with covering the trip, and the trip was flown without a hitch. One pilot was able to get rid of his trip that he didn't want to fly and another pilot was able to pick up more time without regard to the ALV+15. The flying didn't shift bases. It's still the same trip out of the same base. Just because one guy in one seat may be from a different base, he's in that base for that trip.

So then it is your contention that the pilot who dropped the original trip will not pick up anything to fill up his month... Let's say he had a 75 hour month, and dropped a 20 hour trip.. he will be satisfied to finish the month with 55 hours.. got it.. thanks for the clarification. :rolleyes:

tsquare 05-02-2011 06:53 AM


Originally Posted by CVG767A (Post 988143)
I don't see how it creates any sort of liability in any base. If an ATL guy takes my Kiev trip, and I take his Munich trip, both trips are covered, and no time has shifted between bases. As far as denying good trips to more junior pilots in the same base, I don't think that the senior guys would be dumping their good trips in the absence of a desirable swap.

Does our reserve system need fixing? Absolutely. Does out-of-base trip swaps have any impact on a pilot on reserve? I don't think so--

What about trips that are just picked up off of the swap board? You know.. the crap trips that nobody wants? (Except perhaps a reserve pilot who is sitting SC and not flying?) This allows that ATL pilot to fill up his month with no automatic recover of that trip by our base. There is no quid pro quo. I will shut up if they open this to reserves without regard to days of availability.. the old style yellow slips. Other than that, I am gonna make a lot of noise about this, because it is a hose job.

Oh, and I fyp above :)

And lastly, if you give up your KBP trip for MUC, I am going to personally remove your he-man membership.

alfaromeo 05-02-2011 07:10 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 988153)


Bullet catching champion - May 2011.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:31 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands