![]() |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1029102)
Sounds like a plausible idea, but no one shows up to an LEC meeting so how would anyone recall anybody?
|
Delta Air Lines Announces June Quarter Profit
Company produces quarterly profit despite more than $1 billion higher fuel expense Jul 27, 2011 ATLANTA, July 27, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- Delta Air Lines (NYSE: DAL) today reported financial results for the June 2011 quarter. Key points include: Delta's net income for the June 2011 quarter was $366 million, or $0.43 per diluted share, excluding special items(1). Delta's net income was $198 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, for the June 2011 quarter. Strong top line revenue growth of 12% year over year helped offset more than $1 billion higher fuel expense. Delta generated a revenue premium, with unit revenues up 10% for the quarter. Delta generated $1 billion of operating cash flow and $700 million in free cash flow in the quarter. The company ended the June 2011 quarter with $5.6 billion in unrestricted liquidity. "High fuel prices are putting significant pressure on the industry, but the benefits of Delta’s strategic actions and the dedication of Delta employees are evident in the solid profit we produced despite more than $1 billion in higher fuel expense," said Richard Anderson, Delta's chief executive officer. "Our revenue momentum, coupled with the capacity reductions we are making in September and actions to get our non-fuel costs to 2010 levels, will generate the margins we need to hit our return targets." Press Release: Delta Air Lines Announces June Quarter Profit - Jul 27, 2011 |
Originally Posted by Boomer
(Post 1029230)
I wasn't supposed to bring this up... but if you look real close, you can just make out the huge R in front of ALPA in that emblem.
I would tell you what the R stands for, but then they would go after my family. But sorry I may have just put your family in danger. Good luck. :D |
Originally Posted by nerd2009
(Post 1029279)
How do post a picture,..:confused::confused:
Make sure you don't hit Copy Image but Copy Image Location. You need the address for it to work. |
Originally Posted by formerdal
(Post 1029050)
Flying with a captain who had an LEC rep on the jumpseat about a month ago. Told him that basically they have been working on an upcoming merger for a while. Captains impression was this wasn't just for due diligence but rather working on the details of it.Asked if it was Alaska or Hawaiian, rep said neither but would not say who....place your bets....who and when??!! And NO, I cant say who the rep was.
|
I need coffee. :D
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1029300)
Or stock may get hammered today. We fell .23 cents SHORT of analysts expectations.
"Including items, net income was $198 million, or 23 cents a share. In the same quarter a year earlier, net income was $467 million, or 55 cents a share. Special items of $168 million included $80 million in severance and related costs, and $64 million for facilities consolidation and fleet reduction." No, I think we were 1 penny short according to Reuters. Am I reading this wrong? |
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1029309)
"The carrier said second-quarter net income excluding items was $366 million, or 43 cents a share. Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters had estimated 44 cents. Revenue rose 12% to $9.15 billion, in line with estimates."
"Including items, net income was $198 million, or 23 cents a share. In the same quarter a year earlier, net income was $467 million, or 55 cents a share. Special items of $168 million included $80 million in severance and related costs, and $64 million for facilities consolidation and fleet reduction." No, I think we were 1 penny short according to Reuters. Am I reading this wrong? |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1029300)
I need coffee. :D
|
Originally Posted by Maddoggin
(Post 1029298)
While I have no info on who the potential merger partner would be I do think further consolidation is in our future in the next couple of years. My theory is we won't ever see a 2012 contract before another merger. They will delay the process long enough to find another merger partner. Management has learned that including the pilots up front with regards to the merger is a must. They would rather delay Contract 2012 and give contract improvement in the form of a JCBA a couple of years later. They will try to avoid at all cost a big Contract 2012 increase and then another increase via a JCBA. Not what I would like to see but it is the way I see it going down.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:27 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands