Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

hockeypilot44 07-26-2011 06:09 PM


Originally Posted by Wingnutdal (Post 1028974)
Quick question for you guys. Don't we have a rotation garuntee? I did a trip that was a 2 day that was worth 10:10 when I checked in ( on reserve) and after check in a flight was cancelled, which led to two more cancelled flights. After all was said and done, ended up with 7:50.

Does that sound right?

That's right. We're second class pilots on reserve.

Carl Spackler 07-26-2011 06:16 PM


Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy (Post 1029060)
Nice rumor, but do you have any source to back that up?

Yes. From you and slow and the other ALPA lemmings. I've said previously that one of the problems of being in ALPA is that we don't get to control our finances...ALPA does. You lemmings have repeatedly said how wrong I was and that once the money is budgeted for Delta pilots, it is then controlled by Delta pilots.

Don't worry, I always new you weren't serious about that anyway.


Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy (Post 1029060)
That money was contributed via ALPA dues, and I've never heard of dues money being refunded to a group that left ALPA.

So you're saying that we should never think about leaving ALPA...not because ALPA is the best for Delta pilots, but because ALPA will steal the money from Delta pilots that was budgeted for Delta pilots? That about right?

Carl

Carl Spackler 07-26-2011 06:29 PM


Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy (Post 1029114)
acl, this is not directed at you, but it constantly amazes me that pilots think ALPA is some Fairy Godmother that can prevent any ill from ever afflicting every member, regardless of the external circumstances.

Amazing deflection of the facts and complete ignoring of very recent history. No TWA pilot was asking ALPA to be their Fairy Godmother. All they asked was for the representation they were paying for. What did TWA pilots get? Lies, double dealing, destroyed documents, destroyed computers (except one thank God) and withholding of money. Not my opinion, but the jury's verdict. Open your eyes for crying out loud!


Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy (Post 1029114)
I have news for you. Bankruptcy SUCKS! And when you look at all the hits we've taken the past 10 years, there's your cause.

Read above. Because clearly, bankruptcy is not always the cause.

Carl

sailingfun 07-26-2011 06:34 PM


Originally Posted by Columbia (Post 1029127)
Are you kidding? They discovered almost a Billion a year in bag fees. Food is now a huge revenue stream as is booze. Amex contributed over a Billion/year. Capacity discipline that didn't used to exist now drives fares which are 30% higher. ALL of these things did NOT exist just 3 years ago. They have learned from the past and have discovered that people are willing to pony up to see Meema.


They did not learn from the past. In the last downturn there was one airline that was hedged on fuel. That airline was 20 percent of the domestic market. If you control 20 percent of the domestic market you control pricing. They simply refused all fare increases and the other airlines could not raise prices or increase yield. This was a deliberate attempt to put UAL out of business and hopefully one more legacy airline. This is almost a direct quote from SW management at a CP meeting. We are going to use our fuel hedges to put one or two major airlines out of business.
The plan failed and SW was now in a position it was not used to being in. Their cost structure was now high enough relative to the legacy airlines that they could not go into almost any market and push the old carriers out. As a result basically all growth stopped and they had to follow the legacy model of mergers for growth. One failed merger and one merger that is almost done.
What has allowed the increase in revenue with the uptick in fuel prices is that no major airlines are hedged. Everyone has to go along or not make money. If SW were hedged to the extent they were in the last downturn the industry would be a bloodbath now.

FlyingViking 07-26-2011 06:36 PM


Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy (Post 1029125)
They are not THAT smart, or 4 carriers wouldn't have filed for bankruptcy.


OK, the day had to come.... I agree with PG ! :D

Ferd149 07-26-2011 06:41 PM

Friend sent this to me. Used to stay up late and watch it as a kid......

Just thought I'd remind everyone why we do what we do.....

Ferd

1960s TV Sign Off // Current

scambo1 07-26-2011 06:45 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1029151)
They did not learn from the past. In the last downturn there was one airline that was hedged on fuel. That airline was 20 percent of the domestic market. If you control 20 percent of the domestic market you control pricing. They simply refused all fare increases and the other airlines could not raise prices or increase yield. This was a deliberate attempt to put UAL out of business and hopefully one more legacy airline. This is almost a direct quote from SW management at a CP meeting. We are going to use our fuel hedges to put one or two major airlines out of business.
The plan failed and SW was now in a position it was not used to being in. Their cost structure was now high enough relative to the legacy airlines that they could not go into almost any market and push the old carriers out. As a result basically all growth stopped and they had to follow the legacy model of mergers for growth. One failed merger and one merger that is almost done.
What has allowed the increase in revenue with the uptick in fuel prices is that no major airlines are hedged. Everyone has to go along or not make money. If SW were hedged to the extent they were in the last downturn the industry would be a bloodbath now.


Sailing;

What are you trying to say here?

I am reading between the lines, and what I get is: Delta sucks and is stupid. Gas prices will screw us again.

SWA is predatory and we are just a bunch of honest boyscouts.

Is that about right?

UncleSam 07-26-2011 06:46 PM


Originally Posted by Check Essential (Post 1029123)
Let me chime in with yet a 3rd interpretation of reserve responsibilities on a 24 in 7 rest period. Maybe someone can call the office and find out the right answer.

I think Uncle Sam is right on this part:
An assigned 24 hour rest period is different than a "last non-fly day".
There's no "1500" schedule check. During that 24 hours you don't have ANY obligation to answer the phone or check your schedule at all.

We differ on when you might be required to report following your rest:
If they haven't pre-assigned something and had you acknowledge it prior to that 24 hours then you just become a long call pilot at the end. Regular 12 hour leash.
It is legal for them to pre-assign a trip or short call to follow your 24 hours. ie= they call you and say you're on 24 hours rest starting 3:00 PM Tuesday and you have a trip that reports at 3:01 PM Wednesday.

There is not a required schedule check at 1500 on any day, but a wise pilot will check their schedule sometime AFTER 1500 on their last non-fly day since CS is allowed to post a trip or SC that may start as early as 0500. Pilots are required to check it after 1500 but may wait until 0200 the next day (night) if they desire. So the requirement to check your schedule actually is NLT 0200 the next day (after midnight).

It gets more confusing if your rest starts at times other than midnight which is common since CS tries to give you this rest in conjunction with release from duty following a trip. They are not allowed to add time to your 12 hours following a trip unless they tell you about it BEFORE your trip ends. This is a common problem.

forgot to bid 07-26-2011 06:58 PM


Originally Posted by Ferd149 (Post 1029160)
Friend sent this to me. Used to stay up late and watch it as a kid......

Just thought I'd remind everyone why we do what we do.....

Ferd

1960s TV Sign Off // Current

own a Scion? For $21,000 or $19,000. I'm really confused right now. That looked really new.


No wait sorry... buffering.

forgot to bid 07-26-2011 07:01 PM

Ferd, sleep deprivation + voices talking about flying + T38 video... I think you were brainwashed into the USAF? :D


It's better than when I was growing up. You didn't want to see that sign off. It just meant the demons could reach out and grab you and suck you back into the tv. Thank you Hollywood for many a nightmare. aholes.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands