Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Jinks 08-03-2011 01:04 PM

For FTB just in time for college football, Auburn's Hottest Fan, according to Bleacher Report.


http://www.athlonsports.com/sites/de.../Jessica-4.jpg

ImTumbleweed 08-03-2011 01:07 PM


Originally Posted by PilotFrog (Post 1033498)
If the company flies you into a golden X day, what are the consequences?

I ask because they gave me a trip tomorrow that gets me in 5 min before my golden X. And this flight is notorious for being late.

Concequences?

Here ya go.

http://images.cheezburger.com/comple...a99586304b.jpg

Carl Spakler 08-03-2011 01:41 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1032135)
Because this is albatross was hung around ALPAs neck and here's a chance redeem oneself:

FTB,
Do you always agree with juries?

http://blogs.ajc.com/radio-tv-talk/f...am-300x175.jpg
http://withfriendship.com/images/b/8...rder-trial.jpg

Carl Spackler 08-03-2011 02:13 PM


Originally Posted by grnbkrevenge (Post 1033443)
I thought you were the other Carl for a second. :eek:

Yeah, it's pretty sad that ALPA has to stoop to this stuff with the fake Carl. When all you can do is use imitations of avatars in order to confuse the debate, it really shows what you're all about.


Originally Posted by grnbkrevenge (Post 1033443)
You vilify Prator for the better part of the last year because he made 500K while President of ALPA.

That's just one of the reasons he was a bad president. One of many.


Originally Posted by grnbkrevenge (Post 1033443)
Now he's okay with you because he wrote a thank you note in the year 2000 to his lawyer and that supports your position?

No he's not OK with me. The letter is proof of what the former president of ALPA thinks of the Seham law firm. The ALPA apologists here seem to be hanging their hats on the hope of showing the Seham firm as the worst in history. Problem is, there's just too many facts to show otherwise. But I understand your angst when somebody shows you a few of those facts. I guess you have no other choice but to ignore the facts, and change the subject.


Originally Posted by grnbkrevenge (Post 1033443)
Are you a good Prator or a bad Prator? Who's wearing the ruby slippers Carl?

Read above.


Originally Posted by grnbkrevenge (Post 1033443)
BTW. Who keeps handwritten notes from 10 years ago! Talk about teenage-girl-keepsake-box-angst.

All great lawyers keep everything, and I mean everything. But again, it's embarrassing how you spin this as opposed to addressing it.


Originally Posted by grnbkrevenge (Post 1033443)
CAL got rid of them and the entire law firm keeps a hand written note as an endorsement of support? Give me a break. Law firms keep their record of wins as the endorsements, not thank you notes.

More sad spin. You just hate evidence I guess. CAL didn't get rid of the entire law firm. They just decided to re-join ALPA. Since ALPA has their own "law firm", there was no more need for the Seham firm. But please continue to spin away.


Originally Posted by grnbkrevenge (Post 1033443)
Let's look more at the note. What generosity did the Seehams show the CAL pilots that got them their new found quality of life?

Ask John Prater and the two other signators to that letter. Are they all just lying in your mind?


Originally Posted by grnbkrevenge (Post 1033443)
How much generosity are they showing TC and friends in their non-profit entity?

The DPA is lucky to have the Seham firm. I don't know about their generosity, just their ability to fight and win.

Carl

Carl Spackler 08-03-2011 02:26 PM


Originally Posted by Reroute (Post 1033473)
So the Continental pilots fired Seham and joined ALPA, the APA pilots fired Seham and hired ALPA. Great endorsements.

Yet another ALPA shill who hates evidence. Only one problem with your premise: Continental pilots didn't fire the Seham firm. Continental pilots decided to re-join ALPA. ALPA has their own "law firm". Thus no need for another law firm.


Originally Posted by Reroute (Post 1033473)
Seham's failed the AMFA,

Exactly how did Seham fail AMFA? Focus on the question now Reroute...FOCUS


Originally Posted by Reroute (Post 1033473)
Seham has failed USAPA (bottom of the industry)

Seham has not failed USAPA. USAPA does not want that SLI. With Seham's help, they have kept it off of their property for years now. You may not agree with that strategy, but it is USAPA's strategy. A lawyer's job is to help execute the clients strategy. Seham is great at fighting and winning.


Originally Posted by Reroute (Post 1033473)
so obviously he's the choice for DPA,

They are a great choice for DPA. A law firm and not a lap dog. No wonder ALPA hates them so much.


Originally Posted by Reroute (Post 1033473)
a lawyer who is on record stating that seniority is always subject to collective bargaining. No hidden agenda there.:rolleyes:

Answered numerous times. Their statement is in the context of USAPA. Not the case here because we are combined. But I know you'll keep screeching from the rooftops that DPA is all about reversing the SLI. Screech away.


Originally Posted by Reroute (Post 1033473)
I hear that Seham collects $57K/week from USAPA, I'm sure he's chomping on the bit to get significantly more from DPA.

Really? Is that what you hear? Well then, who could ask for more. :rolleyes:

Carl

Carl Spackler 08-03-2011 02:30 PM


Originally Posted by formerdal (Post 1033474)
This is exactly the way guys should be thinking. The company can save face by saying they only gave us a 15% increase. Reasonable pay rate increase with large work rule improvements...still has the overall desired effect on our W2's.

Agree completely, BUT!!!: SWAPA's scope clause.

Then you get me.

Carl

Carl Spackler 08-03-2011 02:33 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spakler (Post 1033539)


Pathetic example of denial. Jury finds you guilty in no time flat. What do you do if you're an ALPA apologist?: Blame the jury.

Make sure you use that strategy during the appeal. That'll work great.

Carl - the real Carl

buzzpat 08-03-2011 02:59 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1033559)
Agree completely, BUT!!!: SWAPA's scope clause.

Then you get me.

Carl

Amen brother. Me too.

Buzz

gloopy 08-03-2011 03:02 PM


Originally Posted by georgetg (Post 1033407)
Bingo!

Sooner than you might think....

Cheers
George

Before of after they pump up their relative list 25% with 15 minutes of hiring and then use that against us?

Columbia 08-03-2011 03:13 PM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1033574)
Before of after they pump up their relative list 25% with 15 minutes of hiring and then use that against us?

IS HAL doing big hiring?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:47 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands